Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 1 |        the man who is judging the case. Consequently if the rules
 2      I, 1 |        hard for those who try the case to satisfy the claims of
 3      I, 1 |  circumstances of each particular case allow. In this it resembles
 4      I, 2 |         of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion.
 5      I, 2 |         arguments suitable to the case in question.~There are,
 6      I, 2 | statements that are so. In either case it is persuasive because
 7      I, 3 |          done by the parties in a case. The ceremonial oratory
 8      I, 3 |           against. The party in a case at law is concerned with
 9      I, 5 |     citizens, and that, as in the case of the state, the founders
10      I, 7 |     reason being the same in each case, namely that without a cause
11      I, 7 |          will choose in any given case": from which it clearly
12      I, 7 |         partly the same as in the case of division (for combination
13      I, 7 |         for it is good in a given case and the other thing is not.
14      I, 9 |       would be made in the latter case become encomiums when differently
15      I, 9 |         that will strengthen your case; it is a noble thing to
16      I, 11|      accustomed to them, in which case it is custom that makes
17      I, 11|         the former class, in each case, are the more likely to
18      I, 12|        Their victims will in that case not be on their guard against
19      I, 12|   possible retribution: as in the case of despotic power, according
20      I, 12|        wronged before; in neither case will they take precautions;
21      I, 12|            nor can they win their case if they do: this is true
22      I, 12|         that they will lose their case. There are those whom it
23      I, 13|          intend it. In the former case, he must be acting either
24      I, 13|           make the justice of our case clear, no matter whether
25      I, 13|           goes by the equity of a case, a judge by the strict law,
26      I, 15|     written law tells against our case, clearly we must appeal
27      I, 15|          written law supports our case, we must urge that the oath "
28      I, 15|        something is or is not the case; they are not valid witnesses
29      I, 15|           fact supporting our own case or telling against that
30      I, 15|    importance, if it supports our case. We may argue that a contract
31      I, 15|         it, and you would in that case have to swear in order to
32      I, 15|  unwilling to accept an oath in a case where you demand that the
33      I, 15|           we are to argue in each case separately, we see also
34     II, 3 |        else. This happened in the case of Ergophilus: though the
35     II, 4 |          same people; for in that case they must have the same
36     II, 4 |          do-for then it will be a case of "potter against potter":~
37     II, 6 |          all the more so, in each case, if it is seen to be our
38     II, 7 |        know this or not-in either case the action is a mere return,
39     II, 7 |        doer does not know how the case stands. In considering this
40     II, 8 |     closely related to us-in that case we feel about them as if
41     II, 9 |      ceases to be envy in the one case and indignation in the other,
42     II, 18|        proposition; in the latter case we still have to use speech
43     II, 21|           views: we must, in that case, either put the supplement
44     II, 22|         the existing facts of the case. It makes no difference
45     II, 22|          more easily we prove our case; and the more closely they
46     II, 23|           No. Sometimes in such a case the two answers differ:
47     II, 23|         killed justly. And in the case of the man who was killed
48     II, 23|           might also be used in a case of parity, as in the lines:~
49     II, 23|           Thus Iphicrates, in the case against Harmodius, said, "
50     II, 23|        motives, A, B, or C: in my case A and B are out of the question,
51     II, 23|          induction. Thus from the case of the woman of Peparethus
52     II, 23|         occurred at Athens in the case between the orator Mantias
53     II, 23|         another at Thebes, in the case between Ismenias and Stilbon,
54     II, 23|          to refute our opponent’s case by noting any contrasts
55     II, 24|       whether to support your own case or to overthrow your opponent’
56     II, 24|         to it: there is in either case an appearance of probable
57     II, 24|         but whereas in the latter case the probability is genuine,
58     II, 25|        probabilities to prove his case: and to refute a conclusion
59     II, 25|         either that the accuser’s case is not probable or that
60     II, 25|          contend that the present case is dissimilar, or that its
61     II, 26|           objection. In the first case we prove the opposite of
62    III, 1 |          persuasion must in every case be effected either (1) by
63    III, 1 |          in fairness to fight our case with no help beyond the
64    III, 12|     things cleverly, it becomes a case of "the man who swallowed
65    III, 13|        parts. You must state your case, and you must prove it.
66    III, 13|          cannot either state your case and omit to prove it, or
67    III, 13|       called the Statement of the case, the second part the Argument,
68    III, 13|      speech; and it cannot in any case have more than Introduction,
69    III, 13|     Comparison" of the opponent’s case with your own, for that
70    III, 13|          a magnifying of your own case and therefore a part of
71    III, 14|          serious attention to the case, or even at distracting
72    III, 14|          popular with those whose case is weak, or looks weak;
73    III, 14|        therefore the facts of the case need no introduction; but
74    III, 15|   confidence in the merits of his case. The argument from evidential
75    III, 16|  narrative continuous is that the case thus expounded is hard to
76    III, 17|         therefore be used in this case only, not in the others.~
77    III, 17|    speeches you will develop your case mainly by arguing that what
78    III, 17|         break down the opponent’s case, whether by objection or
79    III, 17|      beforehand. If, however, the case for the other side contains
80    III, 19|           arguments by which your case has been proved. The first
81    III, 19|          a comparison of your own case with that of your opponent;