Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 1 |   systematic principles apply to political as to forensic oratory,
 2      I, 1 |        authors say nothing about political oratory, but try, one and
 3      I, 1 |       reason for this is that in political oratory there is less inducement
 4      I, 1 |        talk about nonessentials. Political oratory is less given to
 5      I, 1 |     treats of wider issues. In a political debate the man who is forming
 6      I, 2 |     studies may fairly be called political; and for this reason rhetoric
 7      I, 2 |          rhetoric masquerades as political science, and the professors
 8      I, 2 |          the professors of it as political experts-sometimes from want
 9      I, 3 |        divisions of oratory- (1) political, (2) forensic, and (3) the
10      I, 3 |   ceremonial oratory of display.~Political speaking urges us either
11      I, 3 |     different kinds of time. The political orator is concerned with
12      I, 3 |          of its three kinds. The political orator aims at establishing
13      I, 3 |         need of a trial. So too, political orators often make any concession
14      I, 3 |          it is necessary for the political, the forensic, and the ceremonial
15      I, 3 |       namely those dealt with in political, in ceremonial, and lastly
16      I, 4 |          or bad, about which the political orator offers counsel. For
17      I, 4 |   treatment falling naturally to political science.~The main matters
18      I, 4 |          deliberate and on which political speakers make speeches are
19      I, 4 |          of different races. The political speaker will also find the
20      I, 4 |          this is the business of political science and not of rhetoric.~
21      I, 4 |         of information which the political speaker must possess. Let
22      I, 6 |  opposite of the former. Now the political or deliberative orator’s
23      I, 10|       examined in connexion with political oratory; let us now proceed
24     II, 1 |         supporting or opposing a political measure, in pronouncing
25     II, 1 |       hearers decide between one political speaker and another, and
26     II, 1 |         of mind. Particularly in political oratory, but also in lawsuits,
27     II, 1 |        particularly important in political speaking: that the audience
28     II, 18|          is, in law suits and in political debates, in both of which
29     II, 18|       decided. In the section on political oratory an account has already
30     II, 18|       may base our arguments-for political, for ceremonial, and for
31     II, 18|      seem, whether we are making political speeches, speeches of eulogy
32     II, 18|   Possibility and the Future, to political speeches.~
33     II, 20|         is more valuable for the political speaker to supply them by
34    III, 1 |      owing to the defects of our political institutions. No systematic
35    III, 4 |         Demosthenes compared the political orators to nurses who swallow
36    III, 11|      surface and the equality of political powers.~Liveliness is specially
37    III, 12|        oratory, nor are those of political and forensic speaking the
38    III, 13|   forensic speech only: how in a political speech or a speech of display
39    III, 13| recapitulation are only found in political speeches when there is a
40    III, 13|      form no essential part of a political speech. Even forensic speeches
41    III, 14|    Sparta".~The introductions of political oratory will be made out
42    III, 14|       kind, though the nature of political oratory makes them very
43    III, 16|          the beginning of it.~In political oratory there is very little
44    III, 16|       will not be doing what the political speaker, as such, has to
45    III, 17|        down to some one else.~In political speeches you may maintain
46    III, 17|           is highly suitable for political oratory, argument by "enthymeme"
47    III, 17|           better suits forensic. Political oratory deals with future
48    III, 17|         I have justice on mine."~Political oratory is a more difficult
49    III, 17|    comparative ease. Then again, political oratory affords few chances
50    III, 17|        people in the course of a political speech, e.g. upon the Lacedaemonians
51    III, 17|       counter-syllogism. Both in political speaking and when pleading