Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 2 |         means of the persuasive arguments suitable to the case in
 2      I, 2 |         faculties for providing arguments. This is perhaps a sufficient
 3      I, 7 |       on which we must base our arguments, when we are speaking for
 4      I, 8 |        which we are to base our arguments in favour of its utility.
 5      I, 9 |       events that most admit of arguments showing why a thing must
 6      I, 15|        the following are useful arguments. If you have no witnesses
 7      I, 15| opponent’s worthlessness. Other arguments about a witness-that he
 8      I, 15|  discover the other appropriate arguments of this kind. If, however,
 9      I, 15|        in the first place those arguments are suitable which we can
10      I, 15|         or not; and so on-these arguments are as obvious as the others.~
11      I, 15|  already mentioned, and so your arguments also must be combinations
12      I, 15|     must be combinations of the arguments already mentioned.~If you
13      I, 15|     oaths." And there are other arguments which may be used to magnify
14     II, 1 |      which we may best base our arguments so as to convince our hearers-those
15     II, 7 |      must form the basis of our arguments. We must show that the persons
16     II, 11|     which depend the persuasive arguments connected with the emotions.~
17     II, 18|      and overthrow the opposing arguments, and we attack these as
18     II, 18|       to proceed to discuss the arguments common to all oratory. All
19     II, 19|    taking the contraries of the arguments stated above.~Questions
20     II, 19|      and some merely usual. The arguments for the non-occurrence of
21     II, 19|      there will be a house.~For arguments about the Greatness and
22     II, 22|         We should also base our arguments upon probabilities as well
23     II, 22|       out of which to construct arguments. I mean, for instance, how
24     II, 22|    proves anything, whether his arguments are strictly cogent or not:
25     II, 22|       have by us a selection of arguments about questions that may
26     II, 22|        we must try to think out arguments of the same type for special
27     II, 23|        the opposite. These same arguments also form the materials
28     II, 23|       it works out two opposing arguments, and arguments put side
29     II, 23|         opposing arguments, and arguments put side by side are clearer
30     II, 25|       up from the same lines of arguments as the original syllogisms:
31     II, 26|        way to invent and refute arguments. We have next to discuss (
32    III, 7 |         there is nothing in his arguments; which is why many speakers
33    III, 10|         taken either by obvious arguments (using the word "obvious"
34    III, 13|       comparison of conflicting arguments, and recapitulation are
35    III, 13|        Opponent" is part of the arguments: so is "Comparison" of the
36    III, 13|         therefore a part of the arguments, since one who does this
37    III, 16|      long introductions or long arguments. Here, again, rightness
38    III, 16|       to establish the opposite arguments.~You may also narrate as
39    III, 17|              17~The duty of the Arguments is to attempt demonstrative
40    III, 17|       speech; it is part of the Arguments to break down the opponent’
41    III, 17|         you should put your own arguments forward first, and then
42    III, 17|        first, and then meet the arguments on the other side by refuting
43    III, 17|     contains a great variety of arguments, begin with these, like
44    III, 17|          when he demolished the arguments likely to be used against
45    III, 17|       speech, especially if his arguments have been well received.
46    III, 17| argument first. So much for the Arguments.~With regard to the element
47    III, 19|        you should summarize the arguments by which your case has been
48    III, 19|        the natural order of the arguments as spoken, first giving