Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 2 |      of mind; the third on the proof, or apparent proof, provided
 2      I, 2 |      on the proof, or apparent proof, provided by the words of
 3      I, 2 |     the persuasion achieved by proof or apparent proof: just
 4      I, 2 |  achieved by proof or apparent proof: just as in dialectic there
 5      I, 2 |     effects persuasion through proof does in fact use either
 6      I, 2 |    discussed. When we base the proof of a proposition on a number
 7      I, 2 |    accepted that they call for proof. Reasonings of the former
 8      I, 2 | infallible kind is a "complete proof" (tekmerhiou); the fallible
 9      I, 2 |       Sign is called "complete proof": when people think that
10      I, 2 |   bringing forward a "complete proof", meaning that the matter
11      I, 2 |    that constitutes a complete proof, since it is the only kind
12      I, 2 |        Sign, and of a complete proof, and what are the differences
13     II, 1 | believe a thing apart from any proof of it: good sense, good
14     II, 21|     may not have a supplement. Proof is needed where the statement
15     II, 22|        hand: nor, plainly, can proof be effected otherwise by
16     II, 22|       that between syllogistic proof and disproof in dialectic.
17     II, 22|   distinction between lines of proof and lines of disproof: and
18     II, 23|        1. One line of positive proof is based upon consideration
19     II, 23|        not.~2. Another line of proof is got by considering some
20     II, 23|      death.~3. Another line of proof is based upon correlative
21     II, 23|       him. ~4. Another line of proof is the "a fortiori". Thus
22     II, 23|   yourself.~7. Another line of proof is secured by defining your
23     II, 23|      or contrary to it. Such a proof is most effective if every
24     II, 23|        not exist. This line of proof assumes generally that the
25     II, 24|     guilt or innocence, but no proof is given, and the inference
26     II, 24|         again, yields no valid proof. Thus, it might be said
27     II, 24|        is, of course, no valid proof here; not every vicious
28     II, 25|        part of a valid logical proof.~(3) Enthymemes depending
29     II, 25|       not form a valid logical proof: this, too, we see from
30     II, 26|    either in offering positive proof or in raising an objection.
31    III, 1 |       should matter except the proof of those facts. Still, as
32    III, 13|     first stated it; since any proof must be a proof of something,
33    III, 13|      since any proof must be a proof of something, and the only
34    III, 13|   preliminary statement is the proof that follows it. Of these
35    III, 16|    provided by his namely, the proof (where proof is needed)
36    III, 16|       namely, the proof (where proof is needed) that the actions
37    III, 17|      are to be taken on trust; proof of them is only submitted
38    III, 17|    matters-they will look like proof that his other statements