Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 1 |     argues unfairly, we on our part may be able to confute him.
 2      I, 2 |        supports is not that of part to whole, nor whole to part,
 3      I, 2 |    part to whole, nor whole to part, nor whole to whole, but
 4      I, 2 |     nor whole to whole, but of part to part, or like to like.
 5      I, 2 |       to whole, but of part to part, or like to like. When two
 6      I, 4 | country, in order that, if any part of it is superfluous, it
 7      I, 5 |    increases happiness or some part of happiness, we ought to
 8      I, 7 |       but mysell.~And the best part of a good thing is particularly
 9      I, 8 |       therefore, with either a part or the whole of one or other
10      I, 9 |      him; the two latter are a part of "calling happy", just
11      I, 9 |          just as goodness is a part of happiness.~To praise
12      I, 10|     already been cleared up in part in our discussion of the
13      I, 11|  wherein~He is indeed the best part of himself.~Similarly, since
14     II, 1 |       of disposition will form part of our discussion of the
15     II, 13|      to be formed for the most part of elements that are the
16     II, 20| Enthymeme"; for the "Maxim" is part of an enthymeme.~We will
17     II, 21|        will appropriately form part of a speech. This will appear
18     II, 21|  supplement attached, some are part of an Enthymeme, e.g.~Never
19     II, 21|    e.g. you might say, "For my part, since both unpopularity
20     II, 23|     have been a mistake on her part not to do this if she had
21     II, 23|     obvious at first sight-for part of the pleasure we feel
22     II, 24|     where the argument is from part to whole:~"Tis right that
23     II, 25|      no Fallible Sign can form part of a valid logical proof.~(
24    III, 1 |      confine ourselves to that part of it which concerns our
25    III, 1 |         The other—the poetical—part of it has been discussed
26    III, 13|      these two parts the first part is called the Statement
27    III, 13|        of the case, the second part the Argument, just as we
28    III, 13|      For "narration" surely is part of a forensic speech only:
29    III, 13|     but they form no essential part of a political speech. Even
30    III, 13| Refutation of the Opponent" is part of the arguments: so is "
31    III, 13|       own case and therefore a part of the arguments, since
32    III, 14|    such matters in the closing part of his speech. The reason
33    III, 14|       come equally well in any part of a speech; in fact, the
34    III, 16|        sense author. The other part is provided by his namely,
35    III, 17|  division of the speech; it is part of the Arguments to break