Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 4 |         from which he will have to argue in favour of adopting or
 2      I, 6 |       goodness is disputed, we may argue in the following ways:-That
 3      I, 9 |            know on what grounds to argue, and must, therefore, now
 4      I, 15|        equity and justice. We must argue that the juror’s oath "I
 5      I, 15|            defying these.~We shall argue that justice indeed is true
 6      I, 15|   witnesses on your side, you will argue that the judges must decide
 7      I, 15|        other man has not, you will argue that probabilities cannot
 8      I, 15|          supports our case. We may argue that a contract is a law,
 9      I, 15|            contract. Again, we may argue that the duty of the judge
10      I, 15|          to offer an oath, you may argue that men do not hesitate
11      I, 15|            accept an oath, you may argue that an oath is always paid
12      I, 15|             Thus your refusal, you argue, must be due to high principle,
13      I, 15|            accept an oath, you may argue that you trust yourself
14      I, 15|          to offer an oath, you may argue that piety disposes you
15      I, 15|          that we see how we are to argue in each case separately,
16      I, 15|          we see also how we are to argue when they occur in pairs,
17      I, 15|         your present one, you must argue that it is not perjury,
18     II, 18|         oratory; all of us have to argue that things are bigger or
19     II, 19|   greatness and superiority, is to argue without an object; in practical
20     II, 20|         following. The speaker may argue thus: "We must prepare for
21     II, 20|             Where we are unable to argue by Enthymeme, we must try
22     II, 20|         hearers thereby. If we can argue by Enthymeme, we should
23     II, 22|         principles; uneducated men argue from common knowledge and
24     II, 22|          which we are to speak and argue. Otherwise we can have no
25     II, 23|          treatment to another, you argue that the other must have
26     II, 23|          whom a thing is done, you argue that it is true of the doer.
27     II, 23|          is good. Hence you either argue, "It is therefore not well
28     II, 23|            seem incredible. We may argue that people could not have
29     II, 24|        Mother of Heaven:~or we may argue that, because there is much
30     II, 24|            Granted this, one might argue that "what is improbable
31     II, 25|      Probabilities are those which argue from what is, or is supposed
32     II, 25|      general proposition, and then argue deductively to a particular
33     II, 25|   Infallible Signs are those which argue from the inevitable and
34     II, 25|     ordinary Signs are those which argue from some universal or particular
35    III, 15| construction on it. Thus one might argue that Diomedes chose Odysseus