Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 1 |         duty to decide on definite cases brought before them. They
 2      I, 2 | proposition on a number of similar cases, this is induction in dialectic,
 3      I, 2 |          theorize about individual cases. Medicine, for instance,
 4      I, 2 |            is business: individual cases are so infinitely various
 5      I, 7 |   represent them. In the first two cases the decision is virtually
 6      I, 13|            to the endless possible cases presented, such as the kinds
 7      I, 15|          ought to be able to quote cases, familiar to the judges,
 8      I, 15|         course combinations of the cases already mentioned, and so
 9     II, 1 |        These are the only possible cases. It follows that any one
10     II, 2 |         equally angry in all these cases. Hence people who are afflicted
11     II, 2 |      appearance and so on in other cases. We feel particularly angry
12     II, 6 |          what we do, since in both cases eyes are upon us. We also
13     II, 6 |         only consider the converse cases, and plainly we shall have
14     II, 8 |            birth; for in all these cases it appears more likely that
15     II, 9 |      standing; and so in all other cases. The reason is that what
16     II, 19|       thing will be done, in these cases, if the man is actually
17     II, 21|     concisely as possible. In such cases both laconic and enigmatic
18     II, 21|        themselves about particular cases. I will explain what I mean
19     II, 22|   propositions suitable in various cases. We have, in fact, already
20     II, 23|         such an argument is in all cases ridiculous if you are attacking
21     II, 25|           from one or more similar cases, arrive at a general proposition,
22    III, 5 |             nor, except in the few cases where this is appropriate,
23    III, 7 |        tale of and so in all other cases.~This aptness of language
24    III, 11|        auton persai. In both these cases the saying must fit the
25    III, 15|       bringing into the law-courts cases whose decision belonged
26    III, 18|         his discomfiture. In other cases do not attempt interrogation;