Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 1 |       frame of mind. About the orator’s proper modes of persuasion
 2      I, 1 |    have been demonstrated. The orator’s demonstration is an enthymeme,
 3      I, 3 |       who merely decide on the orator’s skill are observers. From
 4      I, 3 |   kinds of time. The political orator is concerned with the future:
 5      I, 3 |   already done. The ceremonial orator is, properly speaking, concerned
 6      I, 3 |     three kinds. The political orator aims at establishing the
 7      I, 3 |        others, about which the orator must be able to have propositions
 8      I, 4 |      about which the political orator offers counsel. For he does
 9      I, 6 |      political or deliberative orator’s aim is utility: deliberation
10     II, 1 |      verdict is a decision-the orator must not only try to make
11     II, 1 |   lawsuits, it adds much to an orator’s influence that his own
12     II, 1 |        frame of mind. That the orator’s own character should look
13     II, 1 |      inspire confidence in the orator’s own character-the three,
14     II, 1 |    useful propositions for the orator, let us now proceed in the
15     II, 2 |    been set forth. Clearly the orator will have to speak so as
16     II, 5 |      should be frightened, the orator must make them feel that
17     II, 19| justice-it is clear that every orator must obtain the materials
18     II, 21|       parent of children." The orator has therefore to guess the
19     II, 22|      of the opposite kind: the orator looks to see what base deeds—
20     II, 23|        in the case between the orator Mantias and his son, when
21    III, 14|        son of Priam." Here the orator gives advice. Or we may
22    III, 16|   these is not provided by the orator’s art, viz. the actions
23    III, 16|       themselves, of which the orator is in no sense author. The