Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 1 |  class of subjects, but is as universal as dialectic; it is clear,
 2      I, 2 |   which it is probable as the universal bears to the particular.
 3      I, 2 |       particular bears to the universal, the other the same as the
 4      I, 2 |     the other the same as the universal bears to the particular.
 5      I, 2 |     relation of particular to universal) may be illustrated thus.
 6      I, 2 |      supports the relation of universal to particular, might be
 7      I, 2 |   which we say the regular or universal Lines of Argument are concerned,
 8      I, 3 |      lesser-propositions both universal and particular. Thus, we
 9      I, 13|       mean particular law and universal law. Particular law is that
10      I, 13| written and partly unwritten. Universal law is the law of Nature.
11      I, 15| clearly we must appeal to the universal law, and insist on its greater
12      I, 15|      changeless, and that the universal law does not change either,
13      I, 15|   contract contravenes either universal law or any written law of
14     II, 21|    succeed in expressing as a universal truth the opinions which
15     II, 25|   those which argue from some universal or particular proposition,
16    III, 3 |       of "popularity" but of "universal popularity", and "dispenser
17    III, 14|       to dispel misgivings is universal—~My lord, I will not say