Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 15|      commit the issue to the gods; and that your opponent
 2     II, 5 |    if our relations with the gods are satisfactory, as will
 3     II, 9 |      indignation even to the gods. It might indeed be thought
 4     II, 23|      argued that if even the gods are not omniscient, certainly
 5     II, 23|     help also believing that gods exist." Or take the argument
 6     II, 23|    seemly to gainsay, as the gods, or one’s father, or one’
 7     II, 23|  Death is an evil thing; the gods have so judged it, or they
 8     II, 23| temple has he profaned? What gods recognized by the state
 9     II, 23|   you say what is wrong, the gods will hate you." The reply
10     II, 23|    you say what is right the gods will love you; if you say
11     II, 23|      that to assert that the gods had birth is as impious
12     II, 23|     there is a time when the gods do not exist. This line
13     II, 23|     common in praises of the gods. Thus, too, Conon called
14    III, 18| believed in the existence of gods but admitted that he talked
15    III, 18|   not either children of the gods or in some way divine?" "
16    III, 18| existence of children of the gods and yet not in the existence
17    III, 18|      in the existence of the gods themselves?" Another good