Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 11|    draws inferences ("That is a so-and-so") and thus learns something
 2     II, 24|      such a process, "Therefore so-and-so is not true", "Therefore
 3     II, 24|      not true", "Therefore also so-and-so must be true"-so too in
 4     II, 26|      that the fact is or is not so-and-so. An objection, on the other
 5    III, 11|      where you say that what is so-and-so in one sense is not so-and-so
 6    III, 11|   so-and-so in one sense is not so-and-so in another; well, if the
 7    III, 11|     suggested. The phrase "like so-and-so" may introduce a hyperbole
 8    III, 15|         to injure him but to do so-and-so; that you did not do what
 9    III, 15|         I am well-groomed? Then so-and-so must be one too." Another,
10    III, 19|       direct: "My opponent said so-and-so on this point; I said so-and-so,
11    III, 19| so-and-so on this point; I said so-and-so, and this is why I said
12    III, 19|         e.g. "He certainly said so-and-so, but I said so-and-so".
13    III, 19|      said so-and-so, but I said so-and-so". Or "How vain he would