Book, Paragraph

  1      I,  5 |            a thing’s essence. It is rendered in the form either of a
  2      I,  6 |         property, or that the genus rendered in the definition is not
  3      I,  7 |            even so, it is apt to be rendered in more than one sense;
  4      I,  7 |            whenever the sameness is rendered in reference to an alternative
  5      I,  7 |          second sense is when it is rendered in reference to a property,
  6      I,  7 |             use is found when it is rendered in reference to some term
  7      I,  14|           proposition is not easily rendered in a definition, but we
  8     II,  2 |           it is obvious that he has rendered the genus as an accident;
  9     II,  2 |         white is "coloured" has not rendered "coloured" as its genus,
 10     II,  2 |          often if the definition be rendered whole, the point at issue
 11     II,  9 | praiseworthy. Then "justly" will be rendered also "praiseworthily", derived
 12     IV,  1 |           and see whether the genus rendered partakes or can possibly
 13     IV,  1 |       anything of which the species rendered is true, while the genus
 14     IV,  2 |          neither embraces the genus rendered nor yet falls under it,
 15     IV,  2 |         things is true of the genus rendered; for if the genera be subordinate
 16     IV,  2 |           to the same, then what is rendered could not be the true genus.~
 17     IV,  2 |           at the genus of the genus rendered, and so continually at the
 18     IV,  2 |        discrepancy, clearly what is rendered is not the true genus. [
 19     IV,  2 |      essence: so that what has been rendered as genus is also predicated
 20     IV,  2 |      disputed whether what has been rendered as genus belongs at all,
 21     IV,  2 |        essence: e.g. if any one has rendered "locomotion" as the genus
 22     IV,  2 |           genus, and see if what is rendered as its genus be also predicated
 23     IV,  2 |  discrepancy, clearly what has been rendered is not the true genus: for
 24     IV,  2 |  discrepancy, clearly what has been rendered is not the genus.~Again,
 25     IV,  2 |         genus.~Again, see if he has rendered the differentia as the genus,
 26     IV,  2 |      differentia; whereas, if it be rendered in this manner, neither
 27     IV,  3 |            and see, also, if he has rendered as genus a metaphorical
 28     IV,  3 |           it, clearly what has been rendered is not the genus. If, on
 29     IV,  4 |      opposite be found in the genus rendered: for either the privation
 30     IV,  4 |           neither could the species rendered be in the genus rendered.
 31     IV,  4 |            rendered be in the genus rendered. If, then, you are demolishing
 32     IV,  5 |            faculty. Hence the terms rendered are not the genera, seeing
 33     IV,  5 |            in cases where the genus rendered is a true predicate. For
 34     IV,  5 |           that neither of the terms rendered could be the genus: for
 35     IV,  6 |      Moreover, see whether the term rendered fail to be the genus of
 36     IV,  6 |   everything. If, therefore, he has rendered "Being" as a genus, clearly
 37     IV,  6 |             S" be used of the genus rendered in relation to its species,
 38     IV,  6 |            If, therefore, the genus rendered admits of a greater degree,
 39     IV,  6 |        after it, then what has been rendered could not be the genus.~
 40     IV,  6 |        clearly neither is the genus rendered. The commonplace rule in
 41     IV,  6 |            to be found in the genus rendered be not found therein, then
 42     IV,  6 |           neither could the species rendered be found therein.~In demolishing
 43     IV,  6 |        should see if both the genus rendered and the species admit of
 44     IV,  6 |         things of which it has been rendered as the genus, supposing
 45     IV,  6 |        genus, supposing the species rendered to be not one single species
 46     IV,  6 |           on the other, the species rendered be single, look and see
 47      V,  1 |             methods:~Any "property" rendered is always either essential
 48      V,  1 |            property is one which is rendered of a thing in comparison
 49      V,  1 |        property could not have been rendered correctly. So a permanent
 50      V,  2 |        property has or has not been rendered correctly. Of a rendering
 51      V,  2 |            therefore in which it is rendered should be more intelligible:
 52      V,  2 |          intelligible terms and has rendered the property more intelligible
 53      V,  2 |         respect have been correctly rendered as a property of "animal".~
 54      V,  2 |            whether any of the terms rendered in the property is used
 55      V,  2 |             not have been correctly rendered. The reasons why this is
 56      V,  2 |         knowledge of this" could be rendered correctly unless he draw
 57      V,  2 |         respect have been correctly rendered. Thus (e.g.) seeing that
 58      V,  2 |         respect have been correctly rendered of man.~Next, for destructive
 59      V,  2 |        purposes, see whether he has rendered in the property any such
 60      V,  2 |             not have been correctly rendered. Thus (e.g.) a man who has
 61      V,  2 |           nothing further should be rendered beside the expression that
 62      V,  2 |     rarefied and lightest body" has rendered more than one property (
 63      V,  2 |             the same thing, and has rendered one only: for then the property
 64      V,  2 |       adaptable to every shape" has rendered as its property a single
 65      V,  3 |           would have been correctly rendered.~You should inquire in the
 66      V,  3 |             not have been correctly rendered. For constructive purposes,
 67      V,  3 |         respect have been correctly rendered. Thus (e.g.) a man who has
 68      V,  3 |        purposes, see whether he has rendered as property something that
 69      V,  3 |             this, even after he has rendered the property it will not
 70      V,  3 |           sometimes to stand still" rendered the kind of property which
 71      V,  3 |            hand, see whether he has rendered something that of necessity
 72      V,  3 |             its possessor good" has rendered as property something that
 73      V,  3 |         respect have been correctly rendered.~Next, for destructive purposes,
 74      V,  3 |         time, and so he cannot have rendered the property correctly,
 75      V,  3 |        purposes, see whether he has rendered a property of the kind whose
 76      V,  3 |             not have been correctly rendered: for it will be uncertain,
 77      V,  3 |            hand, see whether he has rendered the property of a kind that
 78      V,  3 |         respect have been correctly rendered.~Next, for destructive purposes,
 79      V,  3 |        purposes, see whether he has rendered the definition as a property:
 80      V,  3 |          walking, biped animal" has rendered a property of man so as
 81      V,  3 |             not have been correctly rendered. For constructive purposes,
 82      V,  3 |           the property which he has rendered forms a predicate convertible
 83      V,  3 |         respect have been correctly rendered. Thus (e.g.) he who has
 84      V,  3 |     naturally civilized animal" has rendered the property so as to be
 85      V,  3 |         respect have been correctly rendered.~Next, for destructive purposes,
 86      V,  3 |        purposes, see whether he has rendered the property without having
 87      V,  3 |   definitions, the first term to be rendered should be the genus, and
 88      V,  3 |             not have been correctly rendered. Thus (e.g.) a man who has
 89      V,  3 |         respect have been correctly rendered. Thus (e.g.) he who has
 90      V,  3 |           receiving knowledge", has rendered the property after placing
 91      V,  3 |         respect have been correctly rendered.~
 92      V,  4 |         property has been correctly rendered or no, should be made by
 93      V,  4 |             subject of which he has rendered the property, and see (e.g.)
 94      V,  4 |           character of which he has rendered the property: for then what
 95      V,  4 |            see whether the property rendered be true of every instance,
 96      V,  4 |             purposes, see if he has rendered a subject as a property
 97      V,  4 |              inasmuch as he who has rendered "fire" as the property of "
 98      V,  4 |            rarefied particles", has rendered the subject as the property
 99      V,  4 |           other hand, see if he has rendered what is found in the subject
100      V,  4 | specifically the heaviest body" has rendered of the subject as its property
101      V,  4 |             purposes, see if he has rendered the property as partaken
102      V,  4 |              is property of man has rendered the property as partaken
103      V,  4 |            property of "animal" has rendered the property neither as
104      V,  5 |            with "coloured", whether rendered as a property of "surface"
105      V,  5 |         said beforehand that he has rendered a property to a thing either
106      V,  5 |         property of "beautiful" has rendered the term as a property of
107      V,  5 |         property of itself, but has rendered a convertible predicate,
108      V,  5 |           will it have been rightly rendered. Take an instance referring
109      V,  5 |     consists of like parts, but has rendered an attribute of such a kind
110      V,  6 |            the contrary of the term rendered fails to be a property of
111      V,  6 |             correlative of the term rendered fails to be a property of
112      V,  6 |           purposes, if the property rendered is a property of the positive
113      V,  6 |             well. Also, if the term rendered be a property of the negative
114      V,  6 |             other hand, if the term rendered fails to be a property of
115      V,  6 |          parallel with the property rendered) be a property of any of
116      V,  6 |          parallel with the property rendered) be a property of each of
117      V,  6 |           inflexion of the property rendered fails to be a property of
118      V,  6 |           inflexion of the property rendered is a property of the inflexion
119      V,  6 |            opposite of the property rendered fails to be the property
120      V,  7 |           like that of the property rendered fails to be a property of
121      V,  7 |           like that of the property rendered is a property of what is
122      V,  7 |          its property the predicate rendered with this qualification.
123      V,  7 |           of which the property was rendered: for then what has been
124      V,  8 |           through that potentiality rendered the property relatively
125      V,  8 |          air" has, on the one hand, rendered the property potentially (
126      V,  8 |             the other hand has also rendered the property relatively
127      V,  8 |           property potentially, has rendered the property relatively
128      V,  8 |             property of man has not rendered the property correctly stated.
129     VI,  2 |        which of them the definition rendered applies, and one can then
130     VI,  2 |             whose definition he has rendered: and this kind of thing
131     VI,  2 |          various senses of the term rendered in the definition, and then
132     VI,  2 |            that have been correctly rendered also indicate their contraries
133     VI,  4 |        reason why the definition is rendered is to make known the term
134     VI,  4 |         definition would have to be rendered to each several person,
135     VI,  4 |            a definition ought to be rendered through what is more intelligible
136     VI,  4 |             the definition has been rendered of what is at rest and definite
137     VI,  5 |       several things, see if he has rendered it as relative to the worse
138     VI,  6 |          negation.~Again, see if he rendered the species as a differentia,
139     VI,  6 |             whether the differentia rendered indicates an individual
140     VI,  6 |        animal".~See, too, if he has rendered "existence in" something
141     VI,  6 |       mistake.~Again, see if he has rendered an affection as the differentia:
142     VI,  6 |        essence. If, then, a man has rendered any differentia of this
143     VI,  6 |           happen that what has been rendered according to the definition
144     VI,  7 |           other than the definition rendered. Suppose (e.g.) a definition
145     VI,  7 |            degrees, whereas what is rendered according to the definition
146     VI,  7 |             or, vice versa, what is rendered according to the definition
147     VI,  7 |          neither, if indeed what is rendered according to the definition
148     VI,  7 |             and all the other terms rendered in definitions you should
149     VI,  8 |        definition there ought to be rendered either the thing to which
150     VI,  8 |            relation to which he has rendered the term be a process or
151     VI,  8 |           ought, therefore, to have rendered the definition also accordingly.
152     VI,  9 |        terms, see if the species is rendered as relative to a species
153     VI,  9 |          that to which the genus is rendered as relative, e.g. supposing
154     VI,  9 |       fraction. For if it be not so rendered, clearly a mistake has been
155     VI,  9 |          neither of the definitions rendered later could be the definition
156     VI,  9 |           the definition originally rendered of the original term has
157     VI,  9 |           term has not been rightly rendered either. Seeing, moreover,
158     VI,  9 |             the definition of it be rendered in a manner like the above,
159     VI,  9 |            contrary in this must be rendered in a like manner), the result
160     VI,  10|              Further, see if he has rendered a single common definition
161     VI,  10|             fail to see that he has rendered a definition common to both
162     VI,  10|             whenever the definition rendered fails to apply universally,
163     VI,  10|       because the definition he has rendered will not apply to the second
164     VI,  10|             viz. the one previously rendered and also the later one.
165     VI,  11|          that a definition has been rendered of some complex term, take
166     VI,  11|       notion, see if the definition rendered be equimembral with the
167     VI,  11|        definition terms ought to be rendered by phrases, if possible
168     VI,  11|         that a definition should be rendered, seeing that the object
169     VI,  11|           than the genus.~If he has rendered the definition of the differentia,
170     VI,  11|          see whether the definition rendered is common to it and something
171     VI,  12|             be peculiar to the term rendered: for not only but the majority
172     VI,  12|         thief.~Again, see if he has rendered what is desirable for its
173     VI,  13|              clearly the definition rendered could not hold of anything,
174     VI,  13|         than this.~Some definitions rendered in this form fail to come
175     VI,  14|           sees it to be incorrectly rendered: for if the part be demolished,
176    VII,  2 |              clearly the expression rendered could not be a definition.
177    VII,  3 |             all, see that the genus rendered is correctly rendered; for
178    VII,  3 |         genus rendered is correctly rendered; for if the contrary thing
179    VII,  3 |           contrary term, then those rendered in the definition would
180    VII,  3 |      differentiae have been rightly rendered, clearly the expression
181    VII,  5 |          elements of the definition rendered the one is genus and the
182    VII,  5 |      convertible, if the definition rendered is to be peculiar to the
183    VII,  5 |           as a rule the property is rendered in a complex phrase, so
184    VII,  5 |          not peculiar, or the genus rendered be the wrong one, or something
185    VII,  5 |          belong, and that the genus rendered is the true genus, and that
186   VIII,  3 |   definition has not been correctly rendered: e.g. "Has one thing one
187   VIII,  10|      brought, yet the questioner is rendered thereby unable to pursue