Book, Paragraph

  1      I,  5 |       property" which may possibly belong to something else, e.g. "
  2      I,  5 |      certain time it may happen to belong to him alone. That is to
  3      I,  5 |             That nothing which may belong to anything else than A
  4      I,  5 |          which may possibly either belong or not belong to any one
  5      I,  5 |      possibly either belong or not belong to any one and the self-same
  6      I,  5 |          the "sitting posture" may belong or not belong to some self-same
  7      I,  5 |         posture" may belong or not belong to some self-same thing.
  8      I,  5 |       question happen (accidit) to belong more closely?" It is clear
  9      I,  6 |     attribute in question fails to belong only to the term defined,
 10      I,  6 |           the phrase used does not belong, as would be remarked also
 11      I,  16|         temperance?"-for all these belong to the same genus; and also
 12      I,  17|          also look at things which belong to the same genus, to see
 13      I,  18|        argument, however, does not belong properly to dialectic; dialecticians
 14     II,  1 |           we show that it does not belong in any case, we shall also
 15     II,  1 |        have shown that it does not belong in every case. First, then,
 16     II,  1 |            attributes can possibly belong or not belong in part; they
 17     II,  1 |         can possibly belong or not belong in part; they must either
 18     II,  1 |          in part; they must either belong or not belong absolutely.
 19     II,  1 |          must either belong or not belong absolutely. In the case
 20     II,  1 |            to thing which does not belong to it, commit error; and
 21     II,  2 |            and property of a thing belong to it and to nothing else,
 22     II,  2 |           or denied universally to belong to something. Look at them
 23     II,  3 |       sense the attribute does not belong, if we cannot show it of
 24     II,  3 |    whatever the attribute does not belong, we shall have demolished
 25     II,  4 |           that contrary attributes belong to the same thing, look
 26     II,  4 |            all the attributes that belong to the species belong to
 27     II,  4 |         that belong to the species belong to the genus as well; e.g.
 28     II,  4 |            all the attributes that belong to the genus should belong
 29     II,  4 |         belong to the genus should belong also to the species; for "
 30     II,  4 |            on the other hand, that belong to the species must of necessity
 31     II,  4 |          species must of necessity belong also to the genus; for if "
 32     II,  4 |            attributes which do not belong to the genus do not belong
 33     II,  4 |         belong to the genus do not belong to the species either; whereas
 34     II,  6 |         the remaining one does not belong; while if we show that the
 35     II,  6 |         show that the one does not belong, we shall have shown that
 36     II,  6 |        that the remaining one does belong. Clearly then the rule is
 37     II,  6 |         for then he declares it to belong universally when it does
 38     II,  6 |    universally when it does not so belong. Likewise also if he has
 39     II,  7 |          courses are desirable and belong to the same disposition.
 40     II,  7 |        these are objectionable and belong to the same disposition:
 41     II,  7 |            is generally thought to belong to the class of objectionable
 42     II,  7 |      question has been declared to belong: for if the latter belongs
 43     II,  7 |       belongs the former could not belong; for it is impossible that
 44     II,  7 |         contrary predicates should belong at the same time to the
 45     II,  7 |        predicates must necessarily belong to the thing: e.g. if he
 46     II,  7 |        assert that it may possibly belong. For having shown that the
 47     II,  7 |           belongs nor can possibly belong; while on the other hand,
 48     II,  7 |         the accident asserted does belong as well; our proof will
 49     II,  7 |           it is possible for it to belong.~
 50     II,  10|      follow, the accident does not belong. You should establish this
 51     II,  10|         then supposing it does not belong to the subject to which
 52     II,  10|           it is the more likely to belong, neither does it belong
 53     II,  10|            belong, neither does it belong where it is less likely
 54     II,  10|         where it is less likely to belong; while if it does belong
 55     II,  10|           belong; while if it does belong where it is less likely
 56     II,  10|         where it is less likely to belong, then it belongs as well
 57     II,  10|          more generally thought to belong does not belong, neither
 58     II,  10|         thought to belong does not belong, neither does the one that
 59     II,  10|          less generally thought to belong; or, if the one that is
 60     II,  10|          less generally thought to belong does belong, so also does
 61     II,  10|   generally thought to belong does belong, so also does the other.
 62     II,  10|            more usually thought to belong to the one subject does
 63     II,  10|           the one subject does not belong, neither does the remaining
 64     II,  10|            the remaining predicate belong to the remaining subject;
 65     II,  10|            less usually thought to belong to the one subject does
 66     II,  10|            to the one subject does belong, so too does the remaining
 67     II,  10|           is generally supposed to belong, in a like degree, in three
 68     II,  10|         belongs, or is supposed to belong, to two subjects in a like
 69     II,  10|        degree, then if it does not belong to the one, neither does
 70     II,  10|           the one, neither does it belong to the other; while if it
 71     II,  10|        supposing two predicates to belong in a like degree to the
 72     II,  10|          then, if the one does not belong, neither does the remaining
 73     II,  10|         one; while if the one does belong, the remaining one belongs
 74     II,  10|        same also if two predicates belong in a like degree to two
 75     II,  10|         the one predicate does not belong to the one subject, neither
 76     II,  10|            the remaining predicate belong to the remaining subject,
 77     II,  10|          if the one predicate does belong to the one subject, the
 78     II,  11|          speak of a greater degree belong absolutely: for the term "
 79    III,  1 |           which does not happen to belong to the genus in question
 80    III,  1 |           strength. For the former belong in themselves to the class
 81    III,  3 |           Moreover, of things that belong to the same species one
 82    III,  3 |             If the same characters belong to both things you should
 83    III,  6 |          if it belongs or does not belong in one case, does so in
 84    III,  6 |          some instance it does not belong: for then it will follow,
 85    III,  6 |       hypothesis, that it does not belong to any instance at all.
 86    III,  6 |        maintained that it does not belong in some instance, you must
 87    III,  6 |         you must show that it does belong in some instance, for in
 88    III,  6 |         attribute has been said to belong or not to belong, as in
 89    III,  6 |           said to belong or not to belong, as in the case of universal
 90    III,  6 |          the attribute is found to belong in all cases or in none,
 91    III,  6 |     movement: for if none of these belong to time, clearly it does
 92     IV,  1 |          look at all objects which belong to the same genus as the
 93     IV,  1 |          is an attribute which can belong to a thing and also not
 94     IV,  1 |            to a thing and also not belong.~Moreover, see whether the
 95     IV,  2 |            as genus be admitted to belong to the species, only it
 96     IV,  3 |        aforesaid characters do not belong to it, clearly what has
 97     IV,  3 |      attribute belongs or does not belong to one belongs or does not
 98     IV,  3 |            one belongs or does not belong at the same time to all;
 99      V,  1 |          for the property ought to belong to its subject in comparison
100      V,  1 |           not, or is not going to, belong, it will not be a property.
101      V,  3 |          attribute is found not to belong. Moreover, in addition to
102      V,  3 |          be sensible, must clearly belong of necessity: for then the
103      V,  4 |          see (e.g.) if it fails to belong to any of them at all, or
104      V,  4 |          different predicates that belong to it alone, and the subject
105      V,  4 |           property cannot possibly belong simultaneously, but must
106      V,  4 |           simultaneously, but must belong either as posterior or as
107      V,  4 |       through the market-place" to belong to an object as prior and
108      V,  4 |         attributes ought either to belong or not belong to the same
109      V,  4 |            either to belong or not belong to the same things, in so
110      V,  4 |         same in kind, because they belong to each of them in so far
111      V,  4 |           by an accident will also belong to the accident taken along
112      V,  4 |         that belongs to "man" will belong also to "white man", if
113      V,  4 |        belongs to "white man" will belong also to "man". One might,
114      V,  4 |          belongs to the state will belong also to what is called after
115      V,  4 |          called after a state will belong also to the state: e.g.
116      V,  5 |          the property is stated to belong. For every one tries to
117      V,  5 |      belongs naturally may fail to belong to the thing to which it
118      V,  5 |           state possessed, it will belong to what possesses that state;
119      V,  5 |       possesses the state, it will belong to the state possessed,
120      V,  5 |     because then the property will belong to certain other things
121      V,  5 |            is partaken of, it will belong to the things which partake
122      V,  5 |            something else, it will belong to the things partaken of,
123      V,  5 | specifically, because then it will belong only to one of the things
124      V,  5 |          property in question will belong to some of them in a greater
125      V,  6 |           a positive term does not belong at all to a negative, while
126      V,  6 |            to a positive, does not belong as a property.~Next, look
127      V,  7 |        suggested property fails to belong to the "idea" in question,
128      V,  7 |           in question, or fails to belong to it in virtue of that
129      V,  7 |         being motionless" does not belong to "man-himself" qua "man",
130      V,  8 |        view of the attributes that belong in a like manner, and first (
131      V,  8 |           based on attributes that belong in a like manner,’ because
132      V,  8 |    potentiality in question cannot belong to what does not exist:
133      V,  8 |       potentiality in question can belong to what does not exist:
134     VI,  1 |          we argue that it does not belong, we declare it to be untrue.
135     VI,  3 |            six feet high" does not belong to everything that falls
136     VI,  4 |            differentiae, and these belong to the order of things which
137     VI,  6 | differentia of a thing cannot both belong and not belong to it.~Moreover,
138     VI,  6 |         cannot both belong and not belong to it.~Moreover, if either
139     VI,  6 |            by the word does not so belong, then the two could not
140    VII,  1 |          belonging to the one must belong also to the other, and if
141    VII,  1 |          the other, and if the one belong to anything as an accident,
142    VII,  5 |         case only that it fails to belong: further, even if it belongs
143    VII,  5 |      enough to show its failure to belong either in some particular
144    VII,  5 |           to show that it does not belong in one single case. The
145    VII,  5 |    included in the formula fail to belong, the definition is thereby
146    VII,  5 |            kinds of attribute must belong to the thing in question,
147    VII,  5 |            genus may very well not belong as a property without as
148    VII,  5 |         also the property need not belong as a genus, nor the accident
149    VII,  5 |       property, so long as they do belong. So that it is impossible
150    VII,  5 |         that the attributes stated belong, and that the genus rendered
151    VII,  5 |        that the predicate does not belong, or that it does not belong
152    VII,  5 |        belong, or that it does not belong in the particular way stated,
153    VII,  5 |           to show that it does not belong at all.~The commonplace