Book, Paragraph

  1      I,  2 |         easily to argue about the subject proposed. For purposes of
  2      I,  2 |   difficulties on both sides of a subject will make us detect more
  3      I,  6 |         outline a division of our subject, and other questions we
  4      I,  8 |          For every predicate of a subject must of necessity be either
  5      I,  8 |       either convertible with its subject or not: and if it is convertible,
  6      I,  8 |          in the definition of the subject: and if it be one of those
  7      I,  8 |      belongs as an attribute to a subject without being either its
  8      I,  10|           belongs to the contrary subject: e.g. if one ought to do
  9      I,  11|          dialectical problem is a subject of inquiry that contributes
 10      I,  14|         upon each several kind of subject, putting them down under
 11      I,  18|  absolutely unable to discuss the subject before him in any other
 12     II,  2 |         of an accident and of its subject, either of both separately
 13     II,  3 |          both descriptions of the subject in question; e.g. by showing
 14     II,  5 |        change to a more difficult subject: for sometimes the consequence,
 15     II,  7 |    contrariety, we must grasp the subject of contraries, in order
 16     II,  7 |         whether it belongs to the subject to which the accident in
 17     II,  9 |           only in the case of the subject mentioned, but also in the
 18     II,  10|         things which are like the subject in question, and see if
 19     II,  10|           a greater degree of the subject: e.g. if pleasure be good,
 20     II,  10|        follows an increase of the subject, as we have said, clearly
 21     II,  10|         it does not belong to the subject to which it is the more
 22     II,  10|   predicates be attributed to one subject, then if the one which is
 23     II,  10|      thought to belong to the one subject does not belong, neither
 24     II,  10|           belong to the remaining subject; or, if the one which is
 25     II,  10|      thought to belong to the one subject does belong, so too does
 26     II,  10|        predicate to the remaining subject.~Moreover, you can argue
 27     II,  10|           like degree to the same subject, then, if the one does not
 28     II,  10|        does not belong to the one subject, neither does the remaining
 29     II,  10|           belong to the remaining subject, while if the one predicate
 30     II,  10|  predicate does belong to the one subject, the remaining predicate
 31     II,  10|          belongs to the remaining subject as well.~
 32    III,  1 |        better and more honourable subject, e.g. to a god rather than
 33     IV,  3 |         in the other case it is a subject. For the general view is
 34     IV,  4 | commonplace rule is common to the subject of Accident as well: for
 35      V,  1 |           one which separates its subject off not from everything
 36      V,  1 |   property ought to belong to its subject in comparison with every
 37      V,  1 |           that is, so that if the subject be not distinguished by
 38      V,  2 |           unintelligible than the subject whose property he has stated:
 39      V,  2 | attribution of A (property) to B (subject) fails to be more intelligible.
 40      V,  2 |        more intelligible than its subject, but also it should be something
 41      V,  2 |     attribution to the particular subject is a more intelligible attribution.
 42      V,  2 |       attribute of the particular subject at all, will not know either
 43      V,  2 |          found", has introduced a subject which is less intelligible
 44      V,  2 |          does not distinguish its subject from other things is useless,
 45      V,  2 |       term that distinguishes the subject from something: for then
 46      V,  3 |        employed either the actual subject whose property he is rendering,
 47      V,  3 |           may understand: now the subject itself is just as unintelligible
 48      V,  3 |     avoids introducing either the subject itself or any of its species:
 49      V,  3 |         among the rest either the subject itself or any of its species,
 50      V,  3 |        that do or do not make the subject more intelligible: thus,
 51      V,  3 |   anything either opposite to the subject or, in general, anything
 52      V,  3 |           to it does not make its subject more intelligible. Thus (
 53      V,  3 |   simultaneous by nature with the subject, or posterior to it: for
 54      V,  3 |        with, or posterior to, the subject; and so the property of
 55      V,  3 |        does not always follow the subject but sometimes ceases to
 56      V,  3 |       either that the name of the subject must also be true of anything
 57      V,  3 |          yet that the name of the subject will be untrue of anything
 58      V,  3 |    predicate convertible with its subject, without, however, signifying
 59      V,  3 |           be convertible with its subject, without, however, showing
 60      V,  3 |         without having placed the subject within its essence. For
 61      V,  3 |        and should distinguish its subject from other things. Hence
 62      V,  3 |     places within its essence the subject whose property he is rendering,
 63      V,  3 |        property after placing the subject within its essence, and
 64      V,  4 |     purposes, take a look at each subject of which he has rendered
 65      V,  4 |          see if he has rendered a subject as a property of that which
 66      V,  4 |           is described as "in the subject": for then what has been
 67      V,  4 |      particles", has rendered the subject as the property of its predicate, "
 68      V,  4 |    particles". The reason why the subject will not be a property of
 69      V,  4 |        that which is found in the subject is this, that then the same
 70      V,  4 |       belong to it alone, and the subject will be a property of all
 71      V,  4 |     rendered what is found in the subject as a property of the subject:
 72      V,  4 |      subject as a property of the subject: for then what has been
 73      V,  4 |         body" has rendered of the subject as its property something
 74      V,  4 |         an attribute of which the subject partakes is a constituent
 75      V,  4 |           the essence, though the subject is predicated convertibly
 76      V,  4 |           the essence, though the subject is predicated convertibly
 77      V,  4 | differentia nor definition of its subject, and so "an animal capable
 78      V,  4 |          that are the same as the subject, so far as they are the
 79      V,  4 |           that is the same as the subject, in so far as it is the
 80      V,  4 |           the same in kind as the subject fails to be always the same
 81      V,  4 |         to be the property of the subject in question. Thus (e.g.)
 82      V,  4 |           the same in kind as the subject the property that is the
 83      V,  4 |     accident taken along with the subject which it qualifies; e.g.
 84      V,  4 |   properties, by representing the subject as being one thing in itself,
 85      V,  4 |           you should say that the subject of an accident is not absolutely
 86      V,  4 |     accident taken along with its subject; though it is called "another"
 87      V,  5 |      property as belonging to the subject that is so called after
 88      V,  5 |       will be true of its primary subject as well; whereas if you
 89      V,  5 |           state it of its primary subject, then it will be predicated
 90      V,  5 |         he renders it because its subject is partaken of, it will
 91      V,  5 |         he renders it because its subject partakes of something else,
 92      V,  6 |          property of the contrary subject. For then neither will the
 93      V,  6 |         of the correlative of the subject: for then neither will the
 94      V,  6 |     property is a property of the subject’s correlative: for then
 95      V,  6 |           it is a property of the subject: for then the negative term
 96      V,  6 |          not be a property of the subject. Also if, on the other hand,
 97      V,  6 |           it is a property of the subject, then the positive term
 98      V,  6 |          not be a property of the subject: e.g. inasmuch as "animate"
 99      V,  6 |          property of the positive subject: for then neither will the
100      V,  6 |          property of the negative subject. Also, if the negative term
101      V,  6 |          property of the negative subject, neither will the positive
102      V,  6 |          property of the positive subject. Thus (e.g.) inasmuch as "
103      V,  6 |          property of the positive subject: for then the negative term
104      V,  6 |          property of the negative subject as well. Also if the negative
105      V,  6 |          property of the negative subject, the positive will be a
106      V,  6 |          property of the positive subject: for then the same term
107      V,  6 |          property of the negative subject as well. Also, if the term
108      V,  6 |          property of the negative subject, it will not be a property
109      V,  6 |       property of the affirmative subject it would be a property of
110      V,  6 |        members (parallel with the subject): for then neither will
111      V,  6 |        members (parallel with the subject): for then the remaining
112      V,  6 |           of the inflexion of the subject: for then neither will the
113      V,  6 |           of the inflexion of the subject: for then also the other
114      V,  6 |  inflexion of the opposite of the subject: for then neither will the
115      V,  6 |          opposite of the original subject: for then also the inflexion
116      V,  7 |         relation like that of the subject: for then neither will what
117      V,  7 |         relation like that of the subject: for then also what is in
118      V,  7 |           to be a property of the subject which is identically related
119      V,  7 |  identically related to it as the subject in question; for then neither
120      V,  7 |     subjects be a property of the subject which is identically related
121      V,  7 |   subjects is the property of the subject which is identically related
122      V,  7 |  identically related to it as the subject in question, then it will
123      V,  7 |         property of more than one subject. For constructive purposes,
124      V,  7 |     comparison with more than one subject.~Next, for destructive purposes,
125      V,  7 |           to be a property of the subject qualified by the verb "to
126      V,  7 |        the other hand, see if the subject set down as qualified by
127      V,  7 |       property: for then also the subject qualified by the very "to
128      V,  7 |          as its property, and the subject qualified by the verb to
129      V,  7 |         look at the "idea" of the subject stated, and see, for destructive
130      V,  8 |       property of the more likely subject: for then neither will the
131      V,  8 |       property of the less likely subject. Thus (e.g.) inasmuch as "
132      V,  8 |       property of the less likely subject; for then too the more likely
133      V,  8 |       property of the more likely subject. Thus (e.g.) inasmuch as "
134      V,  8 |          be a property of a given subject fails to be its property:
135     VI,  2 |       used be not adequate to the subject in any of its senses, it
136     VI,  3 |          still be peculiar to the subject: for it is impossible that
137     VI,  3 |           as a matter of fact the subject said to be a biped is "a
138     VI,  3 |         than once predicated of a subject; e.g. if he says, like Xenocrates,
139     VI,  6 |         in respect of which it is subject to alteration: for all things
140     VI,  11|         definition is to make the subject familiar; for the differentia
141     VI,  13|          primarily in some single subject, whereas the things which
142     VI,  13|           primarily in any single subject, but each in a separate
143     VI,  13|        found primarily not in one subject only, but in a number of
144     VI,  13|          primarily in some single subject, see if that medium is not
145    VII,  5 |          is to be peculiar to the subject. In overthrowing a view,
146    VII,  5 |         because it belongs to its subject alone and is predicated
147    VII,  5 |   predicated convertibly with its subject.~The easiest thing of all
148   VIII,  2 |           reference to the actual subject of the proposition, unless
149   VIII,  2 |          proposition, unless that subject happen to be the one and
150   VIII,  2 |       unless he can say that this subject is unique of its kind, the
151   VIII,  14|           from topics akin to the subject of the argument. This can
152   VIII,  14|        either a syllogism on some subject or a refutation or a proposition