Book, Paragraph

  1      I,  10|            reality as well will be stated in the course of the discussion
  2     II,  2 |         definition a definition be stated, it becomes obvious.~Moreover,
  3     II,  4 |         e.g. suppose a man to have stated that what is being nourished
  4     II,  6 |             its contrary) has been stated to occur of necessity, it
  5     II,  6 |        necessarily: e.g. if he has stated without any distinction
  6     II,  6 |        look and see also if he has stated a thing to be an accident
  7     II,  8 |            Moreover, the principle stated is just as useful for the
  8     II,  9 |          commonplace rule has been stated before in dealing with the
  9     II,  10|          purposes; for if it be as stated in the case of some one
 10    III,  6 |           question, whereas it was stated in a particular form: for
 11    III,  6 |    demolished. If, however, he has stated that only one single pleasure
 12     IV,  1 |          object of knowledge" were stated to be the genus of "object
 13     IV,  1 |             therefore, "Motion" be stated as the genus of pleasure,
 14     IV,  1 |         everything, one were to be stated as a species and the other
 15     IV,  2 |          be possible for the genus stated, or for its differentia,
 16     IV,  2 |          then neither of the terms stated could be its genus or its
 17     IV,  3 |           principles those already stated for dealing with homonymity:
 18     IV,  3 |         one belonging to the genus stated: for if there should be
 19     IV,  3 |         then clearly what has been stated could not be a genus at
 20     IV,  3 |      species be found in the genus stated, suppose the genus have
 21     IV,  3 |      species is found in the genus stated: for whatever genus contains
 22     IV,  4 |          should follow the rule as stated; but if establishing one
 23     IV,  6 |          should follow the rule as stated. In establishing one, on
 24      V,  1 |     question whether the attribute stated is or is not a property,
 25      V,  2 |           in which the property is stated are not or are more intelligible-for
 26      V,  2 |      subject whose property he has stated: for, if so, the property
 27      V,  2 |        property will not have been stated correctly. For the object
 28      V,  2 |   adequately, e.g. any one who has stated that it is a property of "
 29      V,  2 |             could not be correctly stated to be a property of fire.
 30      V,  2 |          Thus (e.g.) a man who has stated that it is a property of
 31      V,  2 |             could not be correctly stated to be a property of "fire".
 32      V,  2 |           in which the property is stated are more intelligible, and
 33      V,  2 |           will have been correctly stated in this respect: for of
 34      V,  2 |            not have been correctly stated. Thus (e.g.) seeing that
 35      V,  2 |           will have been correctly stated in this respect. Thus (e.g.)
 36      V,  2 |           will have been correctly stated in this respect. Thus (e.g.)
 37      V,  2 |         animal" would be correctly stated as a property of man.~Next,
 38      V,  2 |            not have been correctly stated: for the repetition of it
 39      V,  2 |      properties would be correctly stated. For constructive purposes,
 40      V,  2 |             seeing that he who has stated "animal capable of acquiring
 41      V,  2 |          Thus (e.g.) a man who has stated that it is a property of
 42      V,  2 |            not have been correctly stated. For constructive purposes,
 43      V,  2 |        respect have been correctly stated. Thus (e.g.) inasmuch as
 44      V,  2 |        respect have been correctly stated to be a property of a "living
 45      V,  2 |            not have been correctly stated. For just as in the case
 46      V,  2 |           could not be a correctly stated property of fire to be "
 47      V,  2 |        respect have been correctly stated. Thus (e.g.) a man who has
 48      V,  2 |        respect have been correctly stated.~
 49      V,  3 |            not have been correctly stated. For the object of rendering
 50      V,  3 |            not have been correctly stated. For constructive purposes,
 51      V,  3 |        respect have been correctly stated. Thus (e.g.) a man who has
 52      V,  3 |          Thus (e.g.) a man who has stated that it is a property of
 53      V,  3 |            not have been correctly stated. For an opposite is simultaneous
 54      V,  3 |          Thus (e.g.) a man who has stated that it is a property of
 55      V,  3 |        respect have been correctly stated.~Next, for destructive purposes,
 56      V,  3 |          Thus (e.g.) a man who has stated that it is a property of
 57      V,  3 |            not have been correctly stated. For constructive purposes,
 58      V,  3 |          in this respect correctly stated. Thus (e.g.) a man who has
 59      V,  3 |          Thus (e.g.) a man who has stated that it is a property of
 60      V,  3 |            not have been correctly stated. For in the first place,
 61      V,  3 |          Thus (e.g.) a man who has stated it as the property of a
 62      V,  3 |        respect have been correctly stated. Thus (e.g.) a man who has
 63      V,  3 |          would have been correctly stated.~Next, for destructive purposes,
 64      V,  3 |            not have been correctly stated. For every sensible attribute,
 65      V,  3 |        Thus (e.g.) any one who has stated that it is a property of
 66      V,  3 |        respect have been correctly stated. Thus (e.g.) a man who has
 67      V,  3 |          Thus (e.g.) a man who has stated that it is a property of
 68      V,  3 |            not have been correctly stated: for the property of a thing
 69      V,  3 |             Thus (e.g.) he who has stated that it is a property of
 70      V,  3 |            a property which is not stated in this way could not have
 71      V,  3 |            not have been correctly stated. For constructive purposes,
 72      V,  3 |             Thus (e.g.) he who has stated that is a property of man
 73      V,  4 |        other hand, whether what is stated is or is not a property
 74      V,  4 |         the property is accurately stated will be the same as those
 75      V,  4 |         property: for then what is stated to be a property will not
 76      V,  4 |          respect: for then what is stated not to be a property will
 77      V,  4 |          applies: for then what is stated to be a property will not
 78      V,  4 |       predicated. For then what is stated not to be a property will
 79      V,  4 |             for then what has been stated to be a property will not
 80      V,  4 |             for then what has been stated not to be a property will
 81      V,  4 |        things of which it has been stated to be the property. Thus (
 82      V,  4 |            would have been rightly stated.~Next, for destructive purposes,
 83      V,  4 |      partaken of: for then what is stated to be a property will not
 84      V,  4 |          with it: for then what is stated not to be a property will
 85      V,  4 |             Thus (e.g.) he who has stated that to be "naturally sentient"
 86      V,  4 |         the name: for then what is stated to be a property will not
 87      V,  4 |      differentia: for then what is stated not to be a property will
 88      V,  4 |         the same: for then what is stated to be a property will not
 89      V,  4 |           is the same. For then is stated not to be a property will
 90      V,  4 |          then neither will what is stated to be the property of the
 91      V,  4 |      always true: for then what is stated not to be a property will
 92      V,  5 |          agreed that what has been stated to be a property is upset.
 93      V,  5 |        what things the property is stated to belong. For every one
 94      V,  5 | incontrovertible by argument" when stated as a property of "science"
 95      V,  5 |            purposes, see if he has stated a thing as a property of
 96      V,  5 |             for then what has been stated to be a property will not
 97      V,  5 |    property of itself, but has yet stated a convertible predicate:
 98      V,  5 |        predicate: for then what is stated not to be a property will
 99      V,  5 |          property. Thus he who has stated "animate substance" as a
100      V,  5 |           living-creature" has not stated "living-creature" as a property
101      V,  5 |             for then what has been stated to be the property will
102      V,  5 |         volume of salt water", has stated the property of something
103      V,  5 |          the part: the man who has stated that it is a property of "
104      V,  5 |             to be "breathable" has stated the property of something
105      V,  5 |          of like parts, but he has stated an attribute such as, though
106      V,  5 |             for then what has been stated not to be a property will
107      V,  6 |         then neither will the term stated be a property of that of
108      V,  6 |    property of that of which it is stated to be a property. Thus (
109      V,  6 |          that of which it has been stated not to be a property. Thus (
110      V,  7 |          that of which it has been stated to be a property. (e.g.)
111      V,  7 |          the "idea" of the subject stated, and see, for destructive
112      V,  7 |             for then what has been stated to be a property will not
113      V,  7 |     predicate in question has been stated not to be a property: for
114      V,  7 |             for then what has been stated not to be a property will
115      V,  8 |            exist: for then what is stated to be a property will not
116      V,  8 |             for then what has been stated not to be a property will
117      V,  8 |            purposes, see if he has stated the property in the superlative:
118      V,  8 |             for then what has been stated to be a property will not
119      V,  8 |    rendered the property correctly stated. Thus (e.g.) inasmuch as
120      V,  8 |        respect have been correctly stated.~
121     VI,  2 |          sense: for the definition stated will not apply to the term
122     VI,  2 |          see if, when it is merely stated by itself, it is not evident
123     VI,  3 |            soul, assuming it to be stated as a "self-moving number";
124     VI,  3 |       undigested" is required; for stated the other way the definition
125     VI,  3 |         universal has been already stated. So also, if he defines "
126     VI,  4 |          is to make known the term stated, and we make things known
127     VI,  5 |           to count": for it is not stated what it is that has three
128     VI,  5 |           into the nearest one has stated all the higher genera, seeing
129     VI,  6 |     differentiae, too, that he has stated be those of the genus. For
130     VI,  6 |            whether the differentia stated possesses anything that
131     VI,  6 |            if not, clearly the one stated could not be a differentia
132     VI,  6 |            Moreover, see if he has stated the genus as the differentia,
133     VI,  6 |          the term defined has been stated to be an affection or disposition,
134     VI,  8 |            or final that should be stated, e.g. that desire is not
135     VI,  8 |           the pleasures, should be stated. For it is not the man who
136     VI,  10|          definition of "life" when stated as "a movement of a creature
137    VII,  3 |         the contrary genus to that stated in the definition, and the
138    VII,  3 |            clearly the differentia stated must be predicated of the
139    VII,  5 |        telling whether the formula stated or some other one is its
140    VII,  5 |           i.e. that the attributes stated belong, and that the genus
141    VII,  5 |       belong in the particular way stated, in the case of an accidental
142   VIII,  1 |         his whole argument and has stated the conclusion, people still
143   VIII,  2 |          But until one has oneself stated in what cases it is so,
144   VIII,  5 |         speak as would the man who stated the position.~
145   VIII,  11|           Whenever by the argument stated something is demonstrated,
146   VIII,  14|       dealing with the proposition stated, and after a few attempts