Book, Paragraph

  1      I,  5 |             only, try it as they may, clearly do not render the definition
  2      I,  7 |             is conversing over there"-clearly supposing ourselves to be
  3      I,  8 |               not one of those terms, clearly it would be an accident,
  4      I,  10|           discussion upon contraries. Clearly also, all opinions that
  5      I,  15|              solid edge it is "dull". Clearly, then, the contrary of "
  6      I,  15|       activity (kissing) it has none: clearly, therefore, to "love" is
  7      I,  15|           they are not the same, then clearly the term is ambiguous: e.g. "
  8      I,  15|        contrary bears several senses, clearly the term before you does
  9     II,  2 |            stone, a man, and a horse. Clearly then he renders it as an
 10     II,  2 |              to injure deliberately", clearly it is not possible for a
 11     II,  2 |             some well-behaved person, clearly the good man is not jealous:
 12     II,  2 |           successes of the evil, then clearly the indignant man would
 13     II,  3 |         things should be the same, it clearly is altogether impossible
 14     II,  3 |          possible in some sense, then clearly it is possible. Distinguish
 15     II,  4 |           moved in any of these ways, clearly it does not move at all.
 16     II,  4 |             of the species of motion, clearly it does move; while if it
 17     II,  4 |             of the species of motion, clearly it does not move.~If you
 18     II,  6 |            remaining one does belong. Clearly then the rule is useful
 19     II,  6 |            asserted to occur usually, clearly the speaker has denied an
 20     II,  7 |               and the other to a bad. Clearly, then, from what has been
 21     II,  7 |             us moves with us as well. Clearly also they are objects of
 22     II,  8 |              honourable is pleasant". Clearly, then, the conversion of
 23     II,  8 |          disease. In this case, then, clearly the sequence is converse.
 24     II,  8 |               directly or conversely, clearly neither does the one term
 25     II,  9 |              man or an act, "justly". Clearly, then, when any one member,
 26     II,  10|             subject, as we have said, clearly the accident belongs; while
 27    III,  1 |               first of all it must be clearly laid down that the inquiry
 28    III,  1 |              compared with the other. Clearly, in such cases if we can
 29    III,  1 |            over what produces health. Clearly, therefore, what produces
 30    III,  5 |             reach that standard, then clearly the first-named thing exhibits
 31    III,  6 |      knowledge either should be good. Clearly, then, it is only possible
 32    III,  6 |              of these belong to time, clearly it does not move, nor yet
 33    III,  6 |              be neither odd nor even, clearly it is not a number.~In regard
 34     IV,  1 |              be not good: for, if so, clearly good’ is not the genus of
 35     IV,  1 |               that which is partaken. Clearly, therefore, the species
 36     IV,  1 |            given modes of motion: for clearly you may then take it that
 37     IV,  1 |           shown to apply to one, then clearly it applies to all, and if
 38     IV,  1 |             it fails to apply to one, clearly it fails to apply to any;
 39     IV,  2 |               anywhere a discrepancy, clearly what is rendered is not
 40     IV,  2 |            the other kinds of motion, clearly it would partake of locomotion,
 41     IV,  2 |               anywhere a discrepancy, clearly what has been rendered is
 42     IV,  2 |           subordinate to the species, clearly the species would be subordinate
 43     IV,  2 |               anywhere a discrepancy, clearly what has been rendered is
 44     IV,  2 |           mortal and others immortal. Clearly, then, a bad mistake has
 45     IV,  2 |            species nor an individual. Clearly, therefore, the differentia
 46     IV,  2 |             case of inanimate things. Clearly, also, the species, in the
 47     IV,  3 |            there should be none, then clearly what has been stated could
 48     IV,  3 |      instances, one would come to see clearly a fact like this. An objection
 49     IV,  3 |       characters do not belong to it, clearly what has been rendered is
 50     IV,  3 |              contrary be found in it, clearly the species in question
 51     IV,  3 |            contrary genus: for if so, clearly also the species in question
 52     IV,  4 |               a kind of "useful": for clearly it may be taken to be productive
 53     IV,  4 |              conversion be not alike, clearly the one term is not the
 54     IV,  5 |             appear in the same thing, clearly it is not an accident.~Again,
 55     IV,  6 |             anything at all; for then clearly it also fails to be the
 56     IV,  6 |          rendered "Being" as a genus, clearly it would be the genus of
 57     IV,  6 |              that follows everything, clearly the denotation of the differentia
 58     IV,  6 |            case of snow, thus showing clearly that it could not be the
 59     IV,  6 |               be the genus be not so, clearly neither is the genus rendered.
 60     IV,  6 |               not found therein, then clearly neither could the species
 61     IV,  6 |              different ones: for then clearly it will be the genus. If,
 62     IV,  6 |        knowing is convinced: for then clearly knowledge would be a particular
 63      V,  3 |               if it be sensible, must clearly belong of necessity: for
 64     VI,  1 |              than to do it correctly. Clearly, then, more mistakes are
 65     VI,  3 |             is difficult to determine clearly: the right way to treat
 66     VI,  4 |     definition of the same thing: for clearly he who defines through terms
 67     VI,  4 |            definitions are different. Clearly, then, any one who has not
 68     VI,  4 |              the sun over the earth". Clearly, whoever has said "the passage
 69     VI,  6 |               animal" or "substance", clearly he has not defined it at
 70     VI,  6 |              a division; for, if not, clearly the one stated could not
 71     VI,  6 |               of the genus, for then, clearly, neither of them could be
 72     VI,  6 |             make a species. For then, clearly, this could not be a specific
 73     VI,  6 |               is the genus of virtue, clearly "good" cannot be its genus:
 74     VI,  6 |        predicated, the differentia is clearly the human race. Again, see
 75     VI,  6 |               differentia is true, it clearly follows that the species
 76     VI,  6 |               existence in something, clearly he will have made a bad
 77     VI,  7 |            not pleasant to the cars’: clearly, then, "not pleasant to
 78     VI,  9 |             if it be not so rendered, clearly a mistake has been made.~
 79     VI,  9 |            term originally used, then clearly neither of the definitions
 80     VI,  9 |             of the contrary of good". Clearly, then, he has used the very
 81     VI,  10|              if so, this meaning must clearly be synonymous with those
 82     VI,  11|             the genus; in which case, clearly, the term to be altered
 83     VI,  11|            another term but a phrase, clearly it is of the differentia
 84     VI,  12|               real, the definition is clearly altogether false; while
 85     VI,  12|              be a science of reality. Clearly, then, such a definition
 86     VI,  12|               pilfers in secret": for clearly, if they each do this, then
 87     VI,  13|              of that sort: for there, clearly, you may have the parts
 88     VI,  13|             in a separate one. If so, clearly that term could not be the
 89     VI,  13|            has just been said is most clearly illustrated in the case
 90     VI,  13|              the A and B in question, clearly the definition rendered
 91     VI,  14|              defined through the one, clearly it has not been defined;
 92     VI,  14|               else himself to explain clearly whatever it is that his
 93     VI,  14|     indicative of the object defined, clearly the definition already laid
 94    VII,  1 |             is better than the other! Clearly therefore what is styled "
 95    VII,  1 |               same as the same thing, clearly neither are they the same
 96    VII,  1 |               there is a discrepancy, clearly they are not the same.~See
 97    VII,  1 |            same as "full of air": for clearly if the air be exhausted,
 98    VII,  2 |           expression be not the same, clearly the expression rendered
 99    VII,  3 |             same genus, then it would clearly be in the contrary genus:
100    VII,  3 |           have been rightly rendered, clearly the expression given must
101    VII,  3 |               not of the one in hand, clearly the differentia stated must
102    VII,  3 |              the same as, each other, clearly of the term before you there
103    VII,  5 |               the case of definition. Clearly, then, it is the easiest
104   VIII,  1 |              an apparent slight: for, clearly, if this were secured, we
105   VIII,  2 |              answering the questions, clearly he asks a large number of
106   VIII,  3 |               satisfied of its truth. Clearly, then, the circumstances
107   VIII,  5 |       accepted without qualification, clearly the conclusion sought by
108   VIII,  5 |              one else’s opinion, then clearly it will be the latter’s
109   VIII,  6 |          rejected than the conclusion clearly do not reason correctly:
110   VIII,  7 |            may mean different things. Clearly, then, in the first place,
111   VIII,  7 |             to questions that are not clearly put. If he understands the
112   VIII,  8 | counter-argument to bring against it, clearly he is ill-tempered: for
113   VIII,  9 |          attacking it by himself; for clearly his business is to oppose
114   VIII,  11|             practice and examination, clearly one has to reason not only
115   VIII,  11|            business is a bad partner, clearly applies to an argument as
116   VIII,  11|            argued his case correctly. Clearly, then, not even the argument
117   VIII,  12|             may also be of this type. Clearly then the first thing to
118   VIII,  12|          contrary to general opinion, clearly it is bad, either altogether