Book, Paragraph

  1      I,  4 |  peculiarity or an accident-for the differentia too, applying as it does
  2      I,  8 |            will be the genus or the differentia, inasmuch as the definition
  3      I,  15|            the species is never the differentia of anything, look and see
  4      I,  15|             a species and another a differentia, as (e.g.) clear’ (lit.
  5      I,  15|          the case of a note it is a differentia; for one note is differentiated
  6     IV,  1 |            than the species and its differentia: for the differentia as
  7     IV,  1 |            its differentia: for the differentia as well has a narrower denotation
  8     IV,  2 |          see if he has rendered the differentia as the genus, e.g. "immortal"
  9     IV,  2 |           God". For "immortal" is a differentia of "living being", seeing
 10     IV,  2 |      mistake has been made; for the differentia of a thing is never its
 11     IV,  2 |             is clear: for a thing’s differentia never signifies its essence,
 12     IV,  2 |           whether he has placed the differentia inside the genus, e.g. by
 13     IV,  2 |             number’. For "odd" is a differentia of number, not a species.
 14     IV,  2 |           not a species. Nor is the differentia generally thought to partake
 15     IV,  2 |             individual, whereas the differentia is neither a species nor
 16     IV,  2 |             Clearly, therefore, the differentia does not partake of the
 17     IV,  2 |             too is no species but a differentia, seeing that it does not
 18     IV,  2 |           whether he has placed the differentia inside the species, by taking (
 19     IV,  2 |           cannot be, for always the differentia has an equal or a wider
 20     IV,  2 |         placed the genus inside the differentia, by making "colour" (e.g.)
 21     IV,  2 |          has mentioned the genus as differentia: for it is possible for
 22     IV,  2 |          e.g. that "mixture" is the differentia of "fusion", or that change
 23     IV,  2 |             change of place’ is the differentia of "carriage". All such
 24     IV,  2 |           wider denotation that its differentia, and also should not partake
 25     IV,  2 |           should not partake of its differentia; whereas, if it be rendered
 26     IV,  2 |        narrower denotation than its differentia, and will partake of it.~
 27     IV,  2 |         partake of it.~Again, if no differentia belonging to the genus be
 28     IV,  2 |            genus stated, or for its differentia, to be absent from the alleged
 29     IV,  2 |           could be its genus or its differentia: for the general view is
 30     IV,  2 |           is that the genus and the differentia accompany the species, as
 31     IV,  5 |      converse order render genus as differentia, and differentia as genus,
 32     IV,  5 |           genus as differentia, and differentia as genus, defining (e.g.)
 33     IV,  5 |    vehemence" is the genus, but the differentia: for astonishment is usually
 34     IV,  5 |             and "vehemence" are the differentia. Moreover, if any one renders "
 35     IV,  6 |            he has named as genus or differentia some feature that goes with
 36     IV,  6 |         other hand, he has named as differentia some attribute that follows
 37     IV,  6 |       clearly the denotation of the differentia will be equal to, or wider
 38     IV,  6 |   everything, the denotation of the differentia will be equal to its denotation,
 39     IV,  6 |          some people think that the differentia, too, is a predicate of
 40     IV,  6 |      distinguish the genus from the differentia by employing the aforesaid
 41     IV,  6 |           wider denotation than the differentia; (b) that in rendering the
 42     IV,  6 |            state the genus than the differentia: for any one who says that "
 43     IV,  6 |         walking"; also (c) that the differentia always signifies a quality
 44     IV,  6 |             does not do this of the differentia: for he who says "walking"
 45     IV,  6 |           of a certain quality.~The differentia, then, should be distinguished
 46      V,  4 |             of that kind would be a differentia applying to some one species.
 47      V,  4 |            either a definition or a differentia: for then what is stated
 48      V,  4 |     attribute "man", and is neither differentia nor definition of its subject,
 49     VI,  3 |          things in general, and the differentia from any of the things contained
 50     VI,  4 |             For annul the genus and differentia, and the species too is
 51     VI,  4 |             be known, the genus and differentia must of necessity be known
 52     VI,  4 |         whereas if the genus or the differentia be known it does not follow
 53     VI,  6 |        utterly incapable of being a differentia of anything, e.g. "animal"
 54     VI,  6 |             we must see whether the differentia stated possesses anything
 55     VI,  6 |           one stated could not be a differentia of the genus. For a genus
 56     VI,  6 |           if, though the contrasted differentia exists, it yet is not true
 57     VI,  6 |          neither of them could be a differentia of the genus; for differentiae
 58     VI,  6 | co-ordinates in a division with the differentia of a thing are all true
 59     VI,  6 |             could not be a specific differentia of the genus: for a specific
 60     VI,  6 |           the genus: for a specific differentia, if added to the genus,
 61     VI,  6 |            however, this be no true differentia, no more is the one adduced,
 62     VI,  6 |     differentiae, and the genus and differentia constitute the definition
 63     VI,  6 |            of the definition of the differentia, seeing that one or the
 64     VI,  6 |           rendered the species as a differentia, as do those who define "
 65     VI,  6 |           it is a species and not a differentia.~Moreover, see if he has
 66     VI,  6 |             stated the genus as the differentia, e.g. "Virtue is a good
 67     VI,  6 |            is not the genus but the differentia, on the principle that the
 68     VI,  6 |        genus: it must rather be the differentia’. Moreover, "a state" indicates
 69     VI,  6 |           to be the function of the differentia. See, further, whether the
 70     VI,  6 |           See, further, whether the differentia rendered indicates an individual
 71     VI,  6 |            general view is that the differentia always expresses a quality.~
 72     VI,  6 |           see, further, whether the differentia belongs only by accident
 73     VI,  6 |             object defined. For the differentia is never an accidental attribute,
 74     VI,  6 |          than the genus is: for the differentia of a thing cannot both belong
 75     VI,  6 |             Moreover, if either the differentia or the species, or any of
 76     VI,  6 |          genus be predicated of the differentia; for the general view is
 77     VI,  6 |           is predicated, not of the differentia, but of the objects of which
 78     VI,  6 |            the objects of which the differentia is predicated. Animal (e.g.)
 79     VI,  6 |          animals, not of the actual differentia itself which we predicate
 80     VI,  6 |             it is predicated of the differentia: for this is impossible,
 81     VI,  6 |         impossible, seeing that the differentia is a term with a wider range
 82     VI,  6 |             result will be that the differentia is a species: if, for instance, "
 83     VI,  6 |             man" be predicated, the differentia is clearly the human race.
 84     VI,  6 |             race. Again, see if the differentia fails to be prior to the
 85     VI,  6 |             to the species: for the differentia ought to be posterior to
 86     VI,  6 |            Look and see also if the differentia mentioned belongs to a different
 87     VI,  6 |       general view is that the same differentia cannot be used of two non-subaltern
 88     VI,  6 |           true of that of which the differentia is true, it clearly follows
 89     VI,  6 |             impossible for the same differentia to be used of two non-subaltern
 90     VI,  6 |          genera, and "biped" is the differentia of both. The words "except
 91     VI,  6 |          possibility, that the same differentia may be used of two non-subaltern
 92     VI,  6 |             is no necessity for the differentia to carry with it the whole
 93     VI,  6 |      existence in" something as the differentia of a thing’s essence: for
 94     VI,  6 |           all the same, if ever the differentia does denote existence in
 95     VI,  6 |        rendered an affection as the differentia: for every affection, if
 96     VI,  6 |             of the thing, while the differentia is not of that kind: for
 97     VI,  6 |           not of that kind: for the differentia is generally considered
 98     VI,  6 |             without its own special differentia: for if there be no "walking",
 99     VI,  6 |            thing cannot have as its differentia anything in respect of which
100     VI,  6 |              a man has rendered any differentia of this kind, he has made
101     VI,  6 |            has failed to render the differentia of a relative term relatively
102     VI,  6 |             discrepancy between the differentia and the thing defined: e.g.
103     VI,  11|     exchanged the genus and not the differentia, as in the example just
104     VI,  11|             genus and the other the differentia, and the genus is always
105     VI,  11|             it is not this, but the differentia, that ought to have been
106     VI,  11|             should not describe the differentia, and not the genus; in which
107     VI,  11|      denoting the genus and not the differentia. If, however, a man is substituting
108     VI,  11|        phrase, clearly it is of the differentia rather than of the genus
109     VI,  11|           subject familiar; for the differentia is less familiar than the
110     VI,  11|      rendered the definition of the differentia, see whether the definition
111    VII,  3 |          very well be that the same differentia is used of both, e.g. of
112    VII,  3 |            soul", therefore, is the differentia in both cases, seeing that
113    VII,  3 |              If, then, the contrary differentia to that given be predicated
114    VII,  3 |            one in hand, clearly the differentia stated must be predicated
115    VII,  5 |          one is genus and the other differentia, and that only the genus