Book, Paragraph

  1      I,  2 |         discussed, and this task belongs properly, or most appropriately,
  2      I,  5 |      essence of a thing, but yet belongs to that thing alone, and
  3      I,  5 |         property nor a genus yet belongs to the thing: (something
  4      I,  6 |          which it most naturally belongs, speaking of them as "definitory"
  5      I,  8 |    accident was said’ to be what belongs as an attribute to a subject
  6      I,  10|      that the contrary predicate belongs to the contrary subject:
  7      I,  17|          any identical attribute belongs to them all, e.g. to a man
  8     II,  1 |      have shown that a predicate belongs in every case, we shall
  9     II,  1 |          also have shown that it belongs in some cases. Likewise,
 10     II,  1 |        and say that an attribute belongs to thing which does not
 11     II,  2 |     ascribed as an accident what belongs in some other way. This
 12     II,  2 |           also, if the predicate belongs in no case. This rule is
 13     II,  3 |          one sense the attribute belongs, if we cannot show it of
 14     II,  3 |          also if we show that it belongs in a single case, we shall
 15     II,  3 | preliminary admission that if it belongs in any case whatever, it
 16     II,  3 |         in any case whatever, it belongs universally, supposing this
 17     II,  3 |        to show that an attribute belongs universally; e.g. to argue
 18     II,  6 |     shown that the one attribute belongs, we shall have shown that
 19     II,  7 |       objectionable, and the one belongs to a reasonable disposition
 20     II,  7 |         contrary, see whether it belongs to the subject to which
 21     II,  7 |        belong: for if the latter belongs the former could not belong;
 22     II,  7 |       that the accident actually belongs, it will help you to assert
 23     II,  7 |        that the accident neither belongs nor can possibly belong;
 24     II,  7 |        we show that the contrary belongs, or that the thing is capable
 25     II,  10|       said, clearly the accident belongs; while if it does not follow,
 26     II,  10|        likely to belong, then it belongs as well where it is more
 27     II,  10|       the fact that an attribute belongs, or is generally supposed
 28     II,  10|     supposing that one predicate belongs, or is supposed to belong,
 29     II,  10|        to the other; while if it belongs to the one, it belongs to
 30     II,  10|        it belongs to the one, it belongs to the remaining one as
 31     II,  10|        belong, the remaining one belongs as well. The case is the
 32     II,  10|          the remaining predicate belongs to the remaining subject
 33     II,  11|          greater or less degrees belongs also absolutely: for greater
 34    III,  1 |          is more desirable which belongs to the better and more honourable
 35    III,  5 |     possesses it, or to which it belongs, then whichever does impart
 36    III,  6 |        that the attribute, if it belongs or does not belong in one
 37    III,  6 |      some instance the attribute belongs, you must show that in some
 38    III,  6 |       way it will follow that it belongs to all instances. It is
 39    III,  6 |     claims that if the attribute belongs in one instance, it belongs
 40    III,  6 |      belongs in one instance, it belongs also in all instances alike.~
 41    III,  6 |     whether perhaps none of them belongs, showing e.g. that time
 42     IV,  2 |        it be disputed whether it belongs as genus-it is enough to
 43     IV,  2 |       has been rendered as genus belongs at all, it is not enough
 44     IV,  3 |           For whatever attribute belongs or does not belong to one
 45     IV,  3 |        or does not belong to one belongs or does not belong at the
 46      V,  1 |          like the property which belongs to God, of being an "immortal
 47      V,  1 |          like the property which belongs to any particular man of
 48      V,  1 |      Accident, to see whether it belongs to the one thing and not
 49      V,  2 |       not know either whether it belongs to it alone, so that whichever
 50      V,  3 |         substance to which "man" belongs as a species" has employed
 51      V,  3 |          not be clear whether it belongs, seeing that it is the kind
 52      V,  3 |       not clear whether it still belongs, because it is evidenced
 53      V,  3 |        such as manifestly always belongs, and so the property of "
 54      V,  4 |          always and of necessity belongs simultaneously, without
 55      V,  4 |          always and of necessity belongs simultaneously with the
 56      V,  4 |         the properties mentioned belongs to some one species only
 57      V,  4 |     species only while the other belongs to many, as does "walking
 58      V,  4 |       questioner a property that belongs to one thing and that only.
 59      V,  4 |      only. For an attribute that belongs to something qualified by
 60      V,  4 |           e.g. an attribute that belongs to "man" will belong also
 61      V,  4 |          white man, and one that belongs to "white man" will belong
 62      V,  4 |     state. For an attribute that belongs to the state will belong
 63      V,  4 |         that state, and one that belongs to what is called after
 64      V,  5 |         attribute that naturally belongs, he states it in his language
 65      V,  5 |     indicate one that invariably belongs: for then it would be generally
 66      V,  5 |         attribute that naturally belongs, but his expression actually
 67      V,  5 |    indicates one that invariably belongs: accordingly, "biped" could
 68      V,  5 |          property that naturally belongs, and indicates it in that
 69      V,  5 |     indicates, the property that belongs by nature, and so "an animal
 70      V,  5 |        of a thing something that belongs to it either naturally,
 71      V,  5 |     either naturally, as "biped" belongs to "man", or actually, as "
 72      V,  5 |         as "having four fingers" belongs to a particular man, or
 73      V,  5 |         most rarefied particles" belongs to "fire", or absolutely,
 74      V,  5 |       living being", or one that belongs to a thing only as called
 75      V,  5 |    incontrovertible by argument" belongs to a "scientist" (for simply
 76      V,  5 |    incontrovertible by argument" belongs to "science", or because
 77      V,  5 |      partaken of, as "sensation" belongs to "animal" (for other things
 78      V,  5 |        something else, as "life" belongs to a particular kind of "
 79      V,  5 |         naturally", because what belongs naturally may fail to belong
 80      V,  5 |      thing to which it naturally belongs, as (e.g.) it belongs to
 81      V,  5 |  naturally belongs, as (e.g.) it belongs to a man to have two feet:
 82      V,  5 |          rendering what actually belongs, because one day that attribute
 83      V,  5 |     beforehand that the property belongs because the thing partakes
 84      V,  5 |  distinguished the property that belongs specifically, because then
 85      V,  5 |    property: for the superlative belongs only to one of them, e.g. "
 86      V,  6 |         negative term, though it belongs to a positive, does not
 87      V,  7 |         the property in question belongs to the idea, and belongs
 88      V,  7 |         belongs to the idea, and belongs to it in that respect in
 89      V,  7 |       Thus (e.g.) inasmuch as it belongs to "living-creature-itself"
 90      V,  7 |       and body, and further this belongs to it qua "living-creature",
 91      V,  8 |       the fact that an attribute belongs.~Next, for destructive purposes,
 92      V,  8 |      being none the less; for it belongs most nearly to something
 93     VI,  1 |        we argue that an accident belongs, we declare it to be true,
 94     VI,  3 |          used any attribute that belongs universally, either to real
 95     VI,  3 |         genus. Now any term that belongs to everything separates
 96     VI,  3 |          nothing, while any that belongs to all the things that fall
 97     VI,  6 |         genus to which the thing belongs. Likewise, also, see if,
 98     VI,  6 |          whether the differentia belongs only by accident to the
 99     VI,  6 |        the differentia mentioned belongs to a different genus, neither
100     VI,  6 |         of the genus to which it belongs, but only the one or the
101     VI,  6 |      according to the definition belongs in the present only or past,
102    VII,  3 |          how it should be given, belongs to another inquiry. At present
103    VII,  5 |      belong: further, even if it belongs to everything falling under
104    VII,  5 |          viz. by showing that it belongs in every case, while of
105    VII,  5 |        it has been shown that it belongs either never or not in a
106    VII,  5 |       not enough to show that it belongs, but also that it belongs
107    VII,  5 |        belongs, but also that it belongs as genus has to be shown;
108    VII,  5 |          one has to show that it belongs in every case, whereas to
109    VII,  5 |        is enough to show that it belongs in a particular instance,
110    VII,  5 |        to be shown that it never belongs at all.~It is clear also
111    VII,  5 |         besides this, because it belongs to its subject alone and
112    VII,  5 |          only that the predicate belongs, but also that it belongs
113    VII,  5 |        belongs, but also that it belongs in such and such a particular
114    VII,  5 |    enough to show merely that it belongs. On the other hand, an accidental
115    VII,  5 |        not add how the predicate belongs; and accordingly, while