Book, Paragraph

  1      I,  1 |             when standing up to an argument, avoid saying anything that
  2      I,  1 |            us.~Now reasoning is an argument in which, certain things
  3      I,  2 |            shift the ground of any argument that they appear to us to
  4      I,  5 |           same or different?", for argument about definitions is mostly
  5      I,  5 |       supplied by the same turn of argument with lines of attack upon
  6      I,  11|         regard to which we have no argument because they are so vast,
  7      I,  11|       puzzle one of those who need argument, not punishment or perception.
  8      I,  12|            to universals, e.g. the argument that supposing the skilled
  9      I,  14|           the written handbooks of argument, and should draw up sketch-lists
 10      I,  18|           he failed to address his argument to this. It helps us also
 11      I,  18|    questioner fails to address his argument to the same point; and when
 12      I,  18|          are false. This manner of argument, however, does not belong
 13     II,  2 |         differs in the turn of the argument.~Moreover, you should define
 14     II,  3 |           able to quote any single argument applying to all cases in
 15     II,  4 |         Now the former commonplace argument is fallacious for purposes
 16     II,  4 |    overthrowing a view, the former argument is true while the latter
 17     II,  4 |          not well equipped with an argument against the assertion, look
 18     II,  5 |           is the sophistic turn of argument, whereby we draw our opponent
 19     II,  5 |        well supplied with lines of argument. This process is sometimes
 20     II,  5 |           a good stock of lines of argument. Likewise, also, it is really
 21     II,  5 |          who is standing up to the argument has refused to concede something,
 22     II,  9 |            count as good. The same argument applies also to things tending
 23    III,  1 |        good. You should direct the argument you intend to employ to
 24    III,  6 |          we shall have produced an argument in both ways, both universally
 25     IV,  1 |           in question; or, if your argument be constructive, whether
 26     IV,  4 | demolishing and in establishing an argument, you should examine things
 27     IV,  4 |         two ways of demolishing an argument, first of all by looking
 28     IV,  4 |     abiding of knowledge, the same argument in regard to it will apply.~
 29      V,  2 |         who is about to attempt an argument is in doubt which of the
 30      V,  2 |     conception incontrovertible by argument, because of its unity",
 31      V,  4 |           cannot be deceived by an argument" (for a geometrician is
 32      V,  4 |           he is not deceived by an argument. For constructive purposes,
 33      V,  4 |            is "incontrovertible by argument"; for then the scientist
 34      V,  4 |        will be incontrovertible by argument. For constructive purposes,
 35      V,  4 |          he is incontrovertible by argument"; while the description
 36      V,  4 |         she is incontrovertible by argument". For against an objector
 37      V,  5 |            as "incontrovertible by argument" belongs to a "scientist" (
 38      V,  5 |            be "incontrovertible by argument"), or because it is the
 39      V,  5 |            as "incontrovertible by argument" belongs to "science", or
 40      V,  5 |           did "incontrovertible by argument" when stated as a property
 41      V,  8 |        Also you should look at the argument from a simple predication
 42     VI,  2 |             and then institute his argument against each: for if the
 43    VII,  5 |           material, the quicker an argument comes: for there is more
 44    VII,  5 |        well supplied with lines of argument with regard to our several
 45   VIII,  1 |           or to lend weight to the argument, or to conceal the conclusion,
 46   VIII,  1 |       conclusion, or to render the argument more clear. Beside these
 47   VIII,  1 |          when he has put his whole argument and has stated the conclusion,
 48   VIII,  1 |    uncertain what their opponent’s argument requires, people are more
 49   VIII,  1 |           the knowledge also. This argument resembles induction, but
 50   VIII,  1 |           while at the close of an argument they show their ill-temper.
 51   VIII,  1 |           it is well to expand the argument and insert things that it
 52   VIII,  1 |         additional ornament to the argument, though there is no necessity
 53   VIII,  2 |       reasoning be adopted, but in argument with another reasoning per
 54   VIII,  3 |            easy to stand up to, an argument. Such (e.g.) are those things
 55   VIII,  3 |     principle are hard to treat in argument: for it is not possible
 56   VIII,  3 |            definitions to treat in argument are those that employ terms
 57   VIII,  4 |    questioner is so to develop the argument as to make the answerer
 58   VIII,  5 |            facing the questioner’s argument is bound of necessity to
 59   VIII,  6 |          be either relevant to the argument or irrelevant: if then it
 60   VIII,  6 |            it be irrelevant to the argument, it may be granted without
 61   VIII,  8 |         instance; for to bring the argument to a standstill without
 62   VIII,  8 |            yet difficult, e.g. the argument of Zeno that it is impossible
 63   VIII,  8 |    ill-tempered: for ill-temper in argument consists in answering in
 64   VIII,  9 |           them not for the sake of argument but because he really thinks
 65   VIII,  10|       demolished be false. For the argument may contain many falsehoods,
 66   VIII,  10|           nearer a solution of the argument; it may be true that the
 67   VIII,  10|           that that fallacy of the argument depends: for supposing that
 68   VIII,  10|          given the solution of the argument completely. Any one who
 69   VIII,  10|          and such a point that the argument depends, knows the solution
 70   VIII,  10|  preventing a man from working his argument to a conclusion. It can
 71   VIII,  10|       thereby unable to pursue the argument any farther. Thirdly, one
 72   VIII,  10|            be unable to pursue his argument farther, the objection would
 73   VIII,  11|            Adverse criticism of an argument on its own merits, and of
 74   VIII,  11|       failure to carry through the argument correctly in discussion
 75   VIII,  11|           steps of which a correct argument might have been made against
 76   VIII,  11|         tempers in this way, their argument becomes a contest, not a
 77   VIII,  11|         truth. Accordingly, if the argument be made to depend on something
 78   VIII,  11|     partner, clearly applies to an argument as well; for in arguments
 79   VIII,  11|          in a like strain upon the argument on its own merits, and upon
 80   VIII,  11|          may very well be that the argument is bad, but that the questioner
 81   VIII,  11|    originally had to be proved-the argument is sure to become vitiated.
 82   VIII,  11|            arguments.~In itself an argument is liable to five kinds
 83   VIII,  11|        Clearly, then, not even the argument itself is open to the same
 84   VIII,  11|          is nothing to prevent the argument being open to reproach in
 85   VIII,  11|           is possible also that an argument, even though brought to
 86   VIII,  11|       moreover does not rest as an argument on these additions. With
 87   VIII,  11|         Analytics.~Whenever by the argument stated something is demonstrated,
 88   VIII,  11|            already included in his argument: suppose him to be showing (
 89   VIII,  11|            the ground on which the argument depends.~
 90   VIII,  12|                              12~An argument is clear in one, and that
 91   VIII,  12|            the conclusion, and the argument is concluded through premisses
 92   VIII,  12|   generally is firmly accepted.~An argument is called fallacious in
 93   VIII,  12|         happens when a non-medical argument is taken to be a medical
 94   VIII,  12|      geometrical for a geometrical argument, or one which is not dialectical
 95   VIII,  12|          above as well.~Fallacy in argument is due to a mistake of the
 96   VIII,  12|          arguer rather than of the argument: yet it is not always the
 97   VIII,  12|    preference to many true ones an argument which demolishes some true
 98   VIII,  12|         generally accepted. For an argument of that kind does demonstrate
 99   VIII,  12|          and utterly childish, the argument is worse than many arguments
100   VIII,  12|        false conclusion, though an argument which leads to a false conclusion
101   VIII,  12|            to ask in regard to the argument in itself is, "Has it a
102   VIII,  12|            generally accepted, the argument is dialectical, whereas
103   VIII,  14|          For by "conversion" of an argument is meant the taking the
104   VIII,  14|         the look-out for a line of argument both pro and con: and on
105   VIII,  14|        general application than an argument: for it is difficult to
106   VIII,  14|           the habit of turning one argument into several, and conceal
107   VIII,  14|         akin to the subject of the argument. This can be done with arguments
108   VIII,  14|            conclusion to which the argument leads must be taken generally,
109   VIII,  14|          some people with whom any argument is bound to degenerate.
110   VIII,  14|       casual acquaintances, or bad argument is sure to result. For you
111   VIII,  14|           refrain from contentious argument.~It is best also to have