Book, Paragraph

  1      I,  1 |                   reasoning: for this is the object of our search in the treatise
  2      I,  5 |                   the question, "What is the object before you?"; as, for example,
  3      I,  7 |                    to be indicating the same object by its name and by its accident.~
  4      I,  11|                 description is used; for our object in thus distinguishing them
  5      I,  17|                      knowledge stands to the object of knowledge, so is sensation
  6      I,  17|                     sensation related to the object of sensation), and "As A
  7      I,  18|                    genus we ought to put the object before us when we define
  8     II,  2 |                    but in saying whether the object before us tends to produce
  9     II,  3 |                      then the other man will object that the point which he
 10     II,  3 |                      that have more than one object. For the "desire of X" may
 11     II,  7 |                 verbs may be attached to one object; and this too gives two
 12     II,  8 |                    conceiving, then also the object of knowledge is an object
 13     II,  8 |                    object of knowledge is an object of conception; and if sight
 14     II,  8 |                     sensation, then also the object of sight is an object of
 15     II,  8 |                    the object of sight is an object of sensation. An objection
 16     II,  8 |                   the way described: for the object of sensation is an object
 17     II,  8 |                    object of sensation is an object of knowledge, whereas sensation
 18     II,  8 |               purpose, e.g. to show that the object of sensation is not an object
 19     II,  8 |                object of sensation is not an object of knowledge, on the ground
 20     II,  10|                  knowledge has more than one object, so also will one opinion;
 21     II,  11|                      of something to a given object intensifies the character
 22    III,  3 |                    man might well desire and object to it alike is less desirable
 23    III,  6 |                    of capacity. Also, if the object of conception is in some
 24    III,  6 |               conception is in some cases an object of knowledge, then also
 25    III,  6 |                      marked degree than your object, while no member of that
 26    III,  6 |                     it that neither does the object in question exhibit it;
 27     IV,  1 |                   the soul a kind of "moving object": its motion is an accident
 28     IV,  1 |                      genus to partake of the object which has been placed in
 29     IV,  1 |                   e.g. supposing "being" or "object of knowledge" were stated
 30     IV,  1 |                   stated to be the genus of "object of opinion". For "object
 31     IV,  1 |                     object of opinion". For "object of opinion" will be a predicate
 32     IV,  1 |                     whereas that "being" or "object of knowledge" is not predicated
 33     IV,  1 |                    that neither "being" nor "object of knowledge" is the genus
 34     IV,  1 |                  knowledge" is the genus of "object of opinion": for of the
 35     IV,  1 |                       Again, see whether the object placed in the genus be quite
 36     IV,  1 |                   than the genus, as (e.g.) "object of opinion" has, as compared
 37     IV,  1 |                 objects of opinion, so that "object of opinion" could not be
 38     IV,  1 |                    to fail, to apply to some object which is not specifically
 39     IV,  2 |                  that the genera of the same object must at any rate be subordinate
 40     IV,  2 |                    be predicated of the same object in the category of essence,
 41     IV,  2 |                    essence, so that the same object falls under two genera:
 42     IV,  4 |                      called knowledge "of an object", whereas it is called a "
 43     IV,  4 |                      disposition" not of an "object" but of the "soul".~Again,
 44     IV,  4 |              genitive, and by conversion an "object of knowledge" and an "object
 45     IV,  4 |                 object of knowledge" and an "object of conception" are both
 46     IV,  4 |                     sensation, then also the object of knowledge will have to
 47     IV,  4 |                    will have to be a kind of object of sensation, whereas it
 48     IV,  4 |                    whereas it is not: for an object of knowledge is not always
 49     IV,  4 |                   knowledge is not always an object of sensation: for objects
 50     IV,  4 |                    intuition as well. Hence "object of sensation" is not the
 51     IV,  4 |              sensation" is not the genus of "object of knowledge": and if this
 52     IV,  4 |                    may be (e.g. if the term "object of knowledge" be applied
 53     IV,  4 |                 contrary or knowledge in the object of knowledge, unless the
 54     IV,  4 |                     of knowledge, unless the object of knowledge happen to be
 55     IV,  5 |                    has been described as an "object of perception" or of "sight".
 56     IV,  5 |                  sight". For an animal is an object of perception or of sight
 57     IV,  5 |                  that-"object of sight" and "object of perception" could not
 58     IV,  5 |                    has ascribed as genus the object of which it is an affection,
 59      V,  2 |                    stated correctly. For the object of getting a property constituted
 60      V,  2 |                   than one meaning makes the object described obscure, because
 61      V,  2 |                    this will not do, for the object of rendering the property
 62      V,  3 |                    correctly stated. For the object of rendering the property
 63      V,  4 |                market-place" to belong to an object as prior and as posterior
 64      V,  4 |                     no property of a "proper object of pursuit" to "appear good
 65      V,  4 |                certain persons": for "proper object of pursuit" and "desirable"
 66      V,  8 |                    that way find that of the object of which the description
 67      V,  8 |                      as well: for though the object perish the description will
 68     VI,  1 |                       or (2) that though the object has a genus, he has failed
 69     VI,  1 |                     he has failed to put the object defined into the genus,
 70     VI,  1 |            definition should first place the object in its genus, and then append
 71     VI,  1 |            expression is not peculiar to the object (for, as we said above as
 72     VI,  1 |                     yet failed to define the object, that is, to express its
 73     VI,  1 |                      has failed to place the object in the appropriate genus,
 74     VI,  1 |            expression be not peculiar to the object, we must go on to examine
 75     VI,  1 |                      investigate whether the object has been either not defined
 76     VI,  2 |                    temperance, then the same object will occur in two genera
 77     VI,  3 |                  under the same genus as the object defined: for the mention
 78     VI,  3 |                    genus ought to divide the object from things in general,
 79     VI,  3 |                      separates off the given object from absolutely nothing,
 80     VI,  3 |              predicated convertibly with the object; e.g. "a walking biped animal
 81     VI,  4 |                      definitions of the same object. This sort of view, however,
 82     VI,  4 |                 acceptance: for of each real object the essence is single: if,
 83     VI,  4 |                    thing, the essence of the object will be the same as it is
 84     VI,  4 |                  when the actual name of the object is not used, e.g. supposing
 85     VI,  5 |                      see whether, though the object is in a genus, it has not
 86     VI,  5 |                     where the essence of the object does not stand first in
 87     VI,  5 |                     is the same thing if the object be not put into its nearest
 88     VI,  6 |                      man has not defined the object by the differentiae peculiar
 89     VI,  6 |                      only by accident to the object defined. For the differentia
 90     VI,  8 |                     other differentiae of an object; e.g. the quality and quantity
 91     VI,  9 |                belief to be relative to some object of belief, see whether a
 92     VI,  9 |                  relative to some particular object of belief: and, if a multiple
 93     VI,  11|                    rendered, seeing that the object of rendering the definition
 94     VI,  12|                      distinguish to what the object is related, but have described
 95     VI,  12|                    relative terms: for every object of knowledge is a term relative
 96     VI,  12|                      rendering to render the object in relation to any one whatsoever
 97     VI,  12|                 sciences too, have for their object some real thing, so that
 98     VI,  13|                      If a man has defined an object as "A+B", the first thing
 99     VI,  13|                     not relate to any casual object that is the same, any more
100     VI,  13|                     than each to a different object; rather, they must relate
101     VI,  14|                   and more indicative of the object defined, clearly the definition
102     VI,  14|                  shot at a definition of the object before one, or to adopt
103   VIII,  2 |                      other. People sometimes object to a universal proposition,
104   VIII,  2 |                    similarly treat those who object to the statement that "the
105   VIII,  10|                      For it is not enough to object, even if the point demolished
106   VIII,  10|                    farther. Thirdly, one may object to the questions asked:
107   VIII,  11|                    there genuinely exists an object of opinion in itself": therefore "
108   VIII,  11| object-of-opinion-in-itself is more fully an object of opinion than the particular
109   VIII,  14|                   one ability, and the whole object of training is to acquire