Book, Paragraph

  1      I,  4 |          An animal that walks on two feet" is the definition
  2      I,  4 |          an animal that walks on two feet" a definition of man
  3      I,  5 |        we are able to argue that two things are the same or are
  4      I,  5 |     question is "to which of the two does the predicate in question
  5      I,  7 |          an animal that walks on two feet is said to be the same
  6      I,  14|            In the same way these two should again be divided,
  7     II,  1 |          an animal that walks on two feet is an attribute of
  8     II,  1 |          an animal that walks on two feet". Likewise, also, if
  9     II,  1 |         in problems. They are of two kinds, caused either by
 10     II,  3 |          has its angles equal to two right angles.~If, again,
 11     II,  3 |          is divided is more than two.~Again, consider those expressions
 12     II,  3 |          has its angles equal to two right angles, and the accidental
 13     II,  3 |          has its angles equal to two right angles. If, then,
 14     II,  6 |         have one and one only of two predicates, as (e.g.) a
 15     II,  7 |          objects; and this gives two modes: e.g. to do good to
 16     II,  7 |       object; and this too gives two modes, e.g. to do good to
 17     II,  7 |     objects: and this also gives two modes; e.g. to do good to
 18     II,  7 |       evil to enemies.~The first two then of the aforesaid conjunctions
 19     II,  7 |      each of the others also are two in number. Select therefore
 20     II,  7 |       therefore whichever of the two contraries is useful in
 21     II,  10|       predicate be attributed to two subjects; then supposing
 22     II,  10|        is more likely. Again: If two predicates be attributed
 23     II,  10|          the other. Moreover: If two predicates be attributed
 24     II,  10|      predicates be attributed to two subjects, then if the one
 25     II,  10|        is supposed to belong, to two subjects in a like degree,
 26     II,  10|       one as well. Or, supposing two predicates to belong in
 27     II,  10|         case is the same also if two predicates belong in a like
 28     II,  10|       belong in a like degree to two subjects; for if the one
 29    III,  1 |     desirable, or the better, of two or more things, should be
 30    III,  1 |         discuss for which of the two we ought rather to vote,
 31    III,  1 | desirable than the means, and of two means, that which lies nearer
 32    III,  1 |        incompetent. Moreover, of two productive agents that one
 33    III,  2 |             2~Moreover, whenever two things are very much like
 34    III,  2 |          of consequences lies in two directions, for there are
 35    III,  2 |          the other; for then the two together are not more desirable
 36    III,  2 |         times. Also, that one of two things which if all possess,
 37    III,  2 |       man. Again, in the case of two things, if one is more like
 38    III,  2 |       without power. Also, if of two things we repudiate the
 39    III,  3 |  standard. Nay more, if there be two things both preferable to
 40    III,  3 |      markedly, i.e. which of the two is the more pleasant or
 41    III,  6 |         it can be established in two ways: for whether we show
 42    III,  6 |       possible to demolish it in two ways; e.g. if it be maintained
 43     IV,  2 |          one species falls under two genera, the one is embraced
 44     IV,  2 |          same object falls under two genera: the genera must
 45     IV,  4 |        be a privation, there are two ways of demolishing an argument,
 46     IV,  5 |          anything that exists in two genera or more into one
 47     IV,  6 |        rest is the better of the two, this is the genus into
 48      V,  1 | relatively" gives rise either to two problems or to four. For
 49      V,  1 |         deny it of another, only two problems arise, as in the
 50      V,  1 |          he render one apiece of two attributes to each of two
 51      V,  1 |        two attributes to each of two things, and deny it in each
 52      V,  1 |     questions arising are either two or four, or that arguments
 53      V,  2 |      term is likely to happen in two ways; one is, when a man
 54      V,  4 |        has said that "walking on two feet" is property of man
 55      V,  4 |         partaken of, "walking on two feet" could not be a property
 56      V,  4 |         the mode of being of the two is different: for it is
 57      V,  5 |        every man is possessed of two feet. For constructive purposes,
 58      V,  5 |         belongs to a man to have two feet: so too he errs if
 59      V,  7 |      identically related towards two subjects fails to be a property
 60      V,  7 |        is identically related to two subjects is the property
 61     VI,  1 |         Incorrectness falls into two branches: (1) first, the
 62     VI,  2 |        same object will occur in two genera of which neither
 63     VI,  3 |         eliminated. Which of the two is the real state of the
 64     VI,  4 |       terms may be understood in two senses, either supposing
 65     VI,  4 |           half" is derived from "two", and "two" is an even number:
 66     VI,  4 |         derived from "two", and "two" is an even number: virtue
 67     VI,  4 |         means to be divided into two, and two is even.~
 68     VI,  4 |         be divided into two, and two is even.~
 69     VI,  6 |          same thing cannot be in two genera of which neither
 70     VI,  6 |    differentia cannot be used of two non-subaltern genera. Else
 71     VI,  6 |       species as well will be in two non-subaltern genera: for
 72     VI,  6 |      that the species must be in two non-subaltern genera. Or
 73     VI,  6 |        differentia to be used of two non-subaltern genera, and
 74     VI,  6 |       differentia may be used of two non-subaltern genera, it
 75     VI,  6 |       are perplexed which of the two we are to do.~Moreover,
 76     VI,  6 |          not so belong, then the two could not be the same. So,
 77     VI,  7 |         thing.~Moreover, suppose two things to be before you,
 78     VI,  7 |       the definition relative to two things taken separately:
 79     VI,  10|     there are applicable to them two distinct definitions in
 80     VI,  13|          and courage." For if of two persons each has one of
 81     VI,  13|      persons each has one of the two only, both and yet neither
 82     VI,  13|         it is quite possible for two men to have a mina between
 83     VI,  13|          same as either of these two things, the same criticisms
 84     VI,  13|          and see if possibly the two are not used in the same
 85     VI,  13|        him "courageous". For the two must not relate to any casual
 86     VI,  14|         in the nature of a thing two contraries are equally liable
 87    VII,  1 |                        1~WHETHER two things are "the same" or "
 88    VII,  1 |          their opposites: for if two things be the same, their
 89    VII,  1 |           in a case where one of two things is said to be something
 90    VII,  1 |      kind. Each, however, of the two things termed "greatest"
 91    VII,  3 |  establish a result by comparing two and two together. Thus if
 92    VII,  3 |      result by comparing two and two together. Thus if A defines
 93    VII,  3 |      definition is compared with two things, or two definitions
 94    VII,  3 |     compared with two things, or two definitions with one thing;
 95    VII,  3 |    possibly be one definition of two things or two of the same
 96    VII,  3 |      definition of two things or two of the same thing.~
 97    VII,  5 |        overthrowing it there are two ways: for if it has been
 98    VII,  5 |         demolish what is said in two ways, by showing either
 99   VIII,  2 |        the kind, as for instance two is the one prime number
100   VIII,  9 |  rejected: and this it may be in two ways: for it may be one
101   VIII,  11|       the form of questions, are two different things. For often
102   VIII,  13|       many words, he were to beg two premisses such that this
103   VIII,  14|         the results of either of two hypotheses is no mean instrument;