Book, Paragraph

  1      I,  4 |            be put in this way, ""An animal that walks on two feet"
  2      I,  4 |             of man, is it not?"or ""Animal" is the genus of man, is
  3      I,  4 |   proposition: but if thus, "Is "an animal that walks on two feet"
  4      I,  4 |             of man or no?" [or "Is "animal" his genus or no?"] the
  5      I,  5 |        appropriate to say "He is an animal". The question, "Is one
  6      I,  5 |             for having argued that "animal" is the genus of man, and
  7      I,  7 |            same as a doublet, or an animal that walks on two feet is
  8      I,  9 |             there is "a man" or "an animal", he states its essence
  9      I,  15|              which denotes both the animal and the engine. For the
 10      I,  15|           will be declared to be an animal of a certain kind, and the
 11      I,  15|             different. Thus (e.g.) "animal" is the genus of "raven",
 12      I,  15|             it is a certain kind of animal, so that both the genera
 13      I,  15|           the raven a "flying biped animal", we declare it to be a
 14      I,  15|       engine", we do not call it an animal, nor vice versa.~Look also
 15      I,  15|             in kind, e.g. those of "animal" and "knowledge" (for the
 16     II,  1 |      convertible; e.g. if "to be an animal that walks on two feet is
 17     II,  1 |     conversion to say that "S is an animal that walks on two feet".
 18     II,  1 |             genus; for if "to be an animal is an attribute of S", then "
 19     II,  1 |      attribute of S", then "S is an animal". The same is true also
 20     II,  4 |           also to the species; for "animal" is flying and quadruped,
 21     II,  4 |          for if "man" is good, then animal also is good. On the other
 22     II,  5 |             also said that it is an animal and that it is animate and
 23     II,  8 |             e.g.) as that man be an animal, what is not an animal is
 24     II,  8 |           an animal, what is not an animal is not a man’: and likewise
 25     II,  8 |          sequence is converse: for "animal" follows upon "man but ‘
 26    III,  1 |          primary constituents of an animal, whereas the others are
 27     IV,  1 |            it, as it often is of an animal to walk or to be walking.
 28     IV,  1 |         partakes of both "man" and "animal".~Moreover, see if the term
 29     IV,  5 |           as neither could the same animal at one time be, and at another
 30     IV,  5 |        respect: for a man is not an animal in a particular respect,
 31     IV,  5 |           certain respect; e.g. if "animal" has been described as an "
 32     IV,  5 |   perception" or of "sight". For an animal is an object of perception
 33     IV,  5 |          could not be the genus of "animal".~Sometimes also people
 34     IV,  5 |         detection, defining (e.g.) "animal" as an "animate body"; whereas
 35     IV,  5 |           could not be the genus of animal, seeing that it is a part.~
 36     IV,  6 |          who says that "man" is an "animal" shows what man is better
 37     IV,  6 |         says "walking" describes an animal of a certain quality, whereas
 38     IV,  6 |       quality, whereas he who says "animal" describes an animal of
 39     IV,  6 |          says "animal" describes an animal of a certain quality, whereas
 40     IV,  6 |       quality, whereas he who says "animal" does not describe a walking
 41      V,  1 |           be "by nature a civilized animal": a "relative property"
 42      V,  2 |        sensation" is a property of "animal" has both used more intelligible
 43      V,  2 |          rendered as a property of "animal".~Next, for destructive
 44      V,  2 |         statement of a property of "animal". The reason why the term
 45      V,  2 |         sense, "naturally civilized animal" would be correctly stated
 46      V,  2 |             that he who has stated "animal capable of acquiring knowledge"
 47      V,  3 |             that it is property of "animal" to be "the substance to
 48      V,  3 |            that it is a property of animal "sometimes to move and sometimes
 49      V,  3 |             to be "a walking, biped animal" has rendered a property
 50      V,  3 |           be a "naturally civilized animal" has rendered the property
 51      V,  3 |           property of man to be an "animal capable of receiving knowledge",
 52      V,  4 |         much as the description "an animal capable of receiving knowledge"
 53      V,  4 |           property of man to be "an animal capable of receiving knowledge".
 54      V,  4 |         sentient" is a property of "animal" has rendered the property
 55      V,  4 |             would be a property of "animal".~Next, for destructive
 56      V,  4 |             e.g.) the attribute "an animal capable of receiving knowledge"
 57      V,  4 |             its subject, and so "an animal capable of receiving knowledge"
 58      V,  4 |            in so far as each is an "animal". For constructive purposes,
 59      V,  4 |              being under the genus "animal", while the other pair have
 60      V,  4 | differentiae of the genus, viz. of "animal". This commonplace rule
 61      V,  5 |             of "man" the phrase "an animal capable of receiving knowledge"
 62      V,  5 |       belongs by nature, and so "an animal capable of receiving knowledge"
 63      V,  5 |              sensation" belongs to "animal" (for other things as well
 64      V,  5 |            they already partake of "animal"), or because it partakes
 65      V,  6 |            Thus (e.g.) inasmuch as "animal" is not a property of "man",
 66      V,  6 |             not-man", neither will "animal" be a property of "man".
 67      V,  7 |          property of "man" to be an animal, neither could it be a property
 68      V,  7 |         becoming a man to become an animal; nor could the destruction
 69      V,  7 |         could the destruction of an animal be a property of the destruction
 70      V,  8 |         likely to be a property of "animal" than "knowing" of "man",
 71      V,  8 |   perceiving" is not a property of "animal", "knowing" could not be
 72      V,  8 |            man than "to live" of an animal, and it is a property of
 73      V,  8 |           it would be a property of animal to live.~Thirdly (c) for
 74      V,  8 |     divisible" to be a property of "animal", and "sensible" is not
 75      V,  8 |      sensible" is not a property of animal, "divisible" could not be
 76      V,  8 |          could not be a property of animal. For constructive purposes,
 77      V,  8 |         likely to be a property of "animal" than life’, and "sensation"
 78      V,  8 |         sensation" is a property of animal, "life" would be a property
 79      V,  8 |              would be a property of animal.~Next, look from the point
 80      V,  8 |          even though there exist no animal so constituted as to breathe
 81      V,  8 |        possible to breathe it if no animal exist: so that it will not,
 82      V,  8 |           time when there exists no animal such as to breathe it and
 83      V,  8 |       states "a naturally civilized animal" as a this respect have
 84     VI,  3 |       object; e.g. "a walking biped animal six feet high": for an expression
 85     VI,  3 |         biped: but "a walking biped animal" is the same as man, and
 86     VI,  3 |             therefore walking biped animal is a biped’. But this involves
 87     VI,  3 |             a predicate of "walking animal": if it were, then we should
 88     VI,  3 |           biped is "a walking biped animal", so that the word "biped"
 89     VI,  4 |             man is knows also what "animal" and "walking" are), whereas
 90     VI,  6 |      differentia of anything, e.g. "animal" or "substance", clearly
 91     VI,  6 |        absolute length and absolute animal are the genus.~It may be
 92     VI,  6 |          differentia is predicated. Animal (e.g.) is predicated of "
 93     VI,  6 |             of the species. For if "animal" is to be predicated of
 94     VI,  6 |             its differentiae, then "animal" would be predicated of
 95     VI,  6 |         they are animals; for every animal is either a species or an
 96     VI,  6 |         import with them the genus "animal". If, then, each of the
 97     VI,  6 |          same genus". Thus "walking animal" and "flying animal" are
 98     VI,  6 |         walking animal" and "flying animal" are non-subaltern genera,
 99     VI,  6 |           these are subordinate to "animal". From this possibility,
100     VI,  6 |         either "flying" or "walking animal".~See, too, if he has rendered "