Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  6 |         belong only to the term defined, as we do also in the case
 2      I,  11|      and propositions are to be defined as aforesaid. A "thesis"
 3    III,  3 |         than beauty. A thing is defined as being desired for the
 4     IV,  1 |      the genus. "To partake" is defined as "to admit the definition
 5     IV,  6 |       both, as (e.g.) if he has defined the "soul" as a "form of
 6     VI,  1 |        failed to put the object defined into the genus, or to put
 7     VI,  1 |       of the essence of what is defined): or (3) that the expression
 8     VI,  1 |     foregoing, to see if he has defined it, but defined it incorrectly.~
 9     VI,  1 |       if he has defined it, but defined it incorrectly.~Whether,
10     VI,  1 |      object has been either not defined at all, or else defined
11     VI,  1 |         defined at all, or else defined incorrectly. First, then,
12     VI,  1 |       to examine if it has been defined incorrectly: for with anything
13     VI,  2 |      Likewise also, if the term defined be used in different senses
14     VI,  2 |       clear that he cannot have defined it in any sense aright.~
15     VI,  2 |         for instance, if he has defined knowledge as "unsupplantable",
16     VI,  2 |      will not apply to the term defined, e.g. in the case of temperance:
17     VI,  3 |        same genus as the object defined: for the mention of this
18     VI,  3 |    makes the term that is being defined clear. Such, for instance,
19     VI,  3 |      the self-moving", as Plato defined it. Or perhaps the expression
20     VI,  4 |    whether he has mentioned and defined its essence or no, should
21     VI,  4 |      terms of this kind has not defined at all. Otherwise, there
22     VI,  4 |       then, any one who has not defined a thing through terms that
23     VI,  4 |       more intelligible has not defined it at all.~The statement
24     VI,  4 |       when an opposite has been defined through its opposite, e.
25     VI,  4 |      is-if he has used the term defined itself. This passes unobserved
26     VI,  4 |      e.g. supposing any one had defined the sun as a star that appears
27     VI,  4 |         3) Again, see if he has defined one coordinate member of
28     VI,  4 |    Likewise also, see if he has defined a superior through a subordinate
29     VI,  5 |        if, while the term to be defined is used in relation to many
30     VI,  5 |         of writing" has no more defined it than by rendering it
31     VI,  5 |         of these things has not defined it any better than he who
32     VI,  5 |       case where the term to be defined is used in relation to several
33     VI,  5 |    whereby the nearest genus is defined. For then he would not have
34     VI,  6 |     genus. For if a man has not defined the object by the differentiae
35     VI,  6 |  substance", clearly he has not defined it at all: for the aforesaid
36     VI,  6 | division, e.g. supposing he had defined something as "length possessed
37     VI,  6 |       by accident to the object defined. For the differentia is
38     VI,  6 |          then he could not have defined the term. For none of the
39     VI,  6 |         thing of which the term defined has been stated to be an
40     VI,  6 |       differentia and the thing defined: e.g. supposing the "immortal"
41     VI,  6 |  supposing the "immortal" to be defined as a "living thing immune
42     VI,  7 |     also whether the term being defined is applied in consideration
43     VI,  7 |      you, see if the term to be defined applies more particularly
44     VI,  8 |                   8~If the term defined be relative, either in itself
45     VI,  8 |        relative, e.g. if he has defined "knowledge" as an "incontrovertible
46     VI,  8 |       Likewise, also, if he has defined "grammar" as "knowledge
47     VI,  9 | contrary of the term originally defined: and therefore the definition
48     VI,  9 |  privation must of necessity be defined through the other; whereas
49     VI,  9 |        the other cannot then be defined through the one whose form
50     VI,  9 |           Therefore equality so defined will be "the contrary of
51     VI,  9 |        used the very word to be defined. Suppose, however, that
52     VI,  9 |       e.g. suppose "good" to be defined as "the contrary of evil",
53     VI,  9 |        uses the very term being defined: for "good" is inherent
54     VI,  9 |        used the very word to be defined.~Moreover, see if in rendering
55     VI,  9 |  Examine further whether he has defined by the expression "a privation"
56     VI,  10|   generally thought not to have defined it correctly, for to a synonymous
57     VI,  11|          e.g. that some one has defined a "finite straight line"
58     VI,  11|     term.~Moreover, if the term defined be a compound notion, see
59     VI,  11|       equimembral with the term defined. A definition is said to
60     VI,  11|       equimembral with the term defined when the number of the elements
61     VI,  11|     simple objects too could be defined by merely calling them by
62     VI,  11|         intended requires to be defined. So that this will either
63     VI,  12|      e.g. Suppose "white" to be defined as "colour mingled with
64     VI,  12|        suppose some one to have defined "medicine" as a science
65     VI,  13|     defining anything a man has defined it as an "A and B", or as
66     VI,  13|     suppose, e.g. justice to be defined as "temperance and courage."
67     VI,  13|        said that the term being defined is not "A and B" but the "
68     VI,  13|       if the term that has been defined is in the nature of things
69     VI,  13|        suppose shamelessness be defined as "the product of courage
70     VI,  13|      put together.~If a man has defined an object as "A+B", the
71     VI,  13|    suppose courage to have been defined as "daring with right reasoning":
72     VI,  14|          and the thing has been defined through the one, clearly
73     VI,  14|         clearly it has not been defined; else there will be more
74     VI,  14|      definition of the soul, if defined as a substance capable of
75     VI,  14|        indicative of the object defined, clearly the definition
76    VII,  3 |        have been more precisely defined elsewhere, but for the purposes
77    VII,  3 |       so that if one of them is defined as "productive of" that
78   VIII,  3 |   contraries" has been properly defined, it is easy to bring people