Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  5 |      statement does not hold: for to show that they are the same is
 2      I,  5 |           establish a definition. To show, however, that they are
 3      I,  5 |            same genus; whereas if we show that it is the genus of
 4     II,  1 |         cases. Likewise, also, if we show that it does not belong
 5     II,  1 |             that it is not enough to show that whiteness or justice
 6     II,  1 |       attribute of a man in order to show that he is white or just;
 7     II,  2 |         bring a negative instance to show in what case it is not so:
 8     II,  3 |           attribute of S, you should show your case of one of its
 9     II,  3 |        several senses, if you cannot show it of both. This rule is
10     II,  3 |      establish a statement, we shall show that in one sense the attribute
11     II,  3 |      attribute belongs, if we cannot show it of both senses: whereas
12     II,  3 |   overthrowing a statement, we shall show that in one sense the attribute
13     II,  3 |             not belong, if we cannot show it of both senses. Of course,
14     II,  3 |     attribute universally: for if we show that in any case whatever
15     II,  3 |              and likewise also if we show that it belongs in a single
16     II,  3 |          single instance in order to show that an attribute belongs
17     II,  3 |             that it is impossible to show both, you should show the
18     II,  3 |             to show both, you should show the one, adding an indication
19     II,  4 |     overthrowing a view.~In order to show that contrary attributes
20     II,  4 |            genus; e.g. if we want to show that rightness and wrongness
21     II,  4 |          question be real, for if we show that what follows from the
22     II,  6 |              not belong; while if we show that the one does not belong,
23     II,  7 |             on the other hand, if we show that the contrary belongs,
24     II,  8 |            contrary purpose, e.g. to show that the object of sensation
25    III,  1 |              in such cases if we can show a single advantage, or more
26    III,  6 |            thing universally we also show it in particular: for if
27    III,  6 |          attribute belongs, you must show that in some instance it
28    III,  6 |              some instance, you must show that it does belong in some
29    III,  6 |           pleasure is good, you must show universally that no pleasure
30    III,  6 |        pleasure is not good you must show universally that all pleasure
31    III,  6 |             any other way. For if we show that some particular pleasure
32    III,  6 |             two ways: for whether we show universally that all pleasure
33    III,  6 |      pleasure is good, or whether we show that a particular pleasure
34    III,  6 |          pleasure is not good, if we show that no pleasure is good
35    III,  6 |    universally and in particular, to show that some particular pleasure
36    III,  6 |              Likewise, also, you can show that the soul is not a number,
37     IV,  2 |             as genus-it is enough to show that one of its higher genera
38     IV,  2 |             all, it is not enough to show that one of the higher genera
39     IV,  2 |         walking, it is not enough to show that walking is "motion"
40     IV,  2 |              is "motion" in order to show that it is "locomotion",
41     IV,  2 |         motion as well; but one must show in addition that walking
42      V,  1 |            For one might try both to show that a man is not a biped,
43      V,  1 |             it is possible to try to show both that a man is not naturally
44      V,  1 |              not a quadruped. If you show any of these at all, the
45      V,  2 |            of a rendering, some will show the correctness merely in
46      V,  2 |           respect, while others will show it without qualification.
47      V,  3 |              of a thing ought not to show its essence. Thus (e.g.)
48     VI,  1 |          five parts. For you have to show either (1) that it is not
49     VI,  4 |            define in this way cannot show the essential nature of
50     VI,  7 |              In like manner we shall show also that the same thing
51    VII,  2 |              for it is not enough to show the sameness of content
52    VII,  5 |              longer any necessity to show one’s point universally:
53    VII,  5 |     universally: for it is enough to show that the formula is untrue
54    VII,  5 |            definition. For merely to show that the definition fails
55    VII,  5 |         converse of this in order to show that the term is predicated
56    VII,  5 |   establishing a property one has to show that it is true of everything
57    VII,  5 |        overthrow one it is enough to show in a single case only that
58    VII,  5 |            genus it is not enough to show that it belongs, but also
59    VII,  5 |     overthrowing it, it is enough to show its failure to belong either
60    VII,  5 |             establish it, one has to show that it belongs in every
61    VII,  5 |        overthrow it, it is enough to show that it does not belong
62    VII,  5 |        establish it, it is enough to show that it belongs in a particular
63    VII,  5 |            in other cases one has to show not only that the predicate
64    VII,  5 |             accident it is enough to show merely that it belongs.
65    VII,  5 |             way to demolish it is to show that it does not belong
66   VIII,  1 |            close of an argument they show their ill-temper. Likewise
67   VIII,  3 |       without exception very easy to show, if the definitions involved,
68   VIII,  3 | starting-points be not laid down, to show them is difficult and may
69   VIII,  8 |              no negative instance to show, he obviously shows ill-temper.
70   VIII,  13|          cases what he undertakes to show universally: e.g. if he
71   VIII,  13|              e.g. if he undertook to show that the knowledge of contraries
72   VIII,  13|        supposing e.g. that he had to show that medicine is a science
73   VIII,  13|             other; e.g. if he had to show that the diagonal is incommensurable