Book, Paragraph

 1      V,  1 |     could not have been rendered correctly. So a permanent property
 2      V,  2 |         or has not been rendered correctly. Of a rendering being incorrect
 3      V,  2 |        will not have been stated correctly. For the object of getting
 4      V,  2 |        to the soul" could not be correctly stated to be a property
 5      V,  2 |    naturally found" could not be correctly stated to be a property
 6      V,  2 |          property will have been correctly stated in this respect:
 7      V,  2 |        in this respect have been correctly rendered as a property of "
 8      V,  2 |      property will not have been correctly stated. Thus (e.g.) seeing
 9      V,  2 |          property will have been correctly stated in this respect.
10      V,  2 |      property will not have been correctly rendered. The reasons why
11      V,  2 |          this" could be rendered correctly unless he draw a distinction
12      V,  2 |          property will have been correctly stated in this respect.
13      V,  2 |       civilized animal" would be correctly stated as a property of
14      V,  2 |      happened will not have been correctly stated: for the repetition
15      V,  2 |          the properties would be correctly stated. For constructive
16      V,  2 |        in this respect have been correctly rendered. Thus (e.g.) seeing
17      V,  2 |        in this respect have been correctly rendered of man.~Next, for
18      V,  2 |      property will not have been correctly rendered. Thus (e.g.) a
19      V,  2 |    knowledge could not have been correctly stated. For constructive
20      V,  2 |        in this respect have been correctly stated. Thus (e.g.) inasmuch
21      V,  2 |        in this respect have been correctly stated to be a property
22      V,  2 |      property will not have been correctly stated. For just as in the
23      V,  2 |         and so it could not be a correctly stated property of fire
24      V,  2 |        in this respect have been correctly stated. Thus (e.g.) a man
25      V,  2 |        in this respect have been correctly stated.~
26      V,  3 |      property will not have been correctly stated. For the object of
27      V,  3 |     property could not have been correctly stated. For constructive
28      V,  3 |        in this respect have been correctly stated. Thus (e.g.) a man
29      V,  3 |        creature" would have been correctly rendered.~You should inquire
30      V,  3 |      property will not have been correctly stated. For an opposite
31      V,  3 |         good could not have been correctly rendered. For constructive
32      V,  3 |        in this respect have been correctly rendered. Thus (e.g.) a
33      V,  3 |        in this respect have been correctly stated.~Next, for destructive
34      V,  3 |      property will not have been correctly described. For there is
35      V,  3 |     property could not have been correctly stated. For constructive
36      V,  3 |        have been in this respect correctly stated. Thus (e.g.) a man
37      V,  3 |        in this respect have been correctly rendered.~Next, for destructive
38      V,  3 |      property will not have been correctly stated. For in the first
39      V,  3 |       have rendered the property correctly, seeing that he has described
40      V,  3 |        in this respect have been correctly stated. Thus (e.g.) a man
41      V,  3 |         property would have been correctly stated.~Next, for destructive
42      V,  3 |      property will not have been correctly stated. For every sensible
43      V,  3 |     property could not have been correctly rendered: for it will be
44      V,  3 |        in this respect have been correctly stated. Thus (e.g.) a man
45      V,  3 |        in this respect have been correctly rendered.~Next, for destructive
46      V,  3 |      property will not have been correctly stated: for the property
47      V,  3 |          man could not have been correctly rendered. For constructive
48      V,  3 |        in this respect have been correctly rendered. Thus (e.g.) he
49      V,  3 |        in this respect have been correctly rendered.~Next, for destructive
50      V,  3 |          way could not have been correctly rendered. Thus (e.g.) a
51      V,  3 |     creature could not have been correctly stated. For constructive
52      V,  3 |        in this respect have been correctly rendered. Thus (e.g.) he
53      V,  3 |        in this respect have been correctly rendered.~
54      V,  4 |    whether the property has been correctly rendered or no, should be
55      V,  8 |        not rendered the property correctly stated. Thus (e.g.) inasmuch
56      V,  8 |         a this respect have been correctly stated.~
57     VI,  1 |    easier to do it than to do it correctly. Clearly, then, more mistakes
58     VI,  2 |       definitions that have been correctly rendered also indicate their
59     VI,  4 |      then, a man defines a thing correctly or incorrectly you should
60     VI,  10|   thought not to have defined it correctly, for to a synonymous term
61     VI,  14|     before one, or to adopt some correctly expressed definition. For
62    VII,  3 |       that the genus rendered is correctly rendered; for if the contrary
63    VII,  5 |          and this has to be done correctly.~Of the rest, the property
64   VIII,  3 |          definition has not been correctly rendered: e.g. "Has one
65   VIII,  5 |          since a man who reasons correctly demonstrates his proposed
66   VIII,  6 | conclusion clearly do not reason correctly: hence, when men ask these
67   VIII,  11|       carry through the argument correctly in discussion is due to
68   VIII,  11|           he has argued his case correctly. Clearly, then, not even