Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  1 |           it quite enough from the point of view of the line of inquiry
 2      I,  5 |           while "two-footed" is in point of fact ascribed as a property
 3      I,  15|          containing a sharp angle (point).~Look also at the genera
 4      I,  18|           his argument to the same point; and when we ourselves put
 5      I,  18|           and have then proved the point as regards these cases.
 6      I,  18|            form of rest), and of a point on a line and the unit in
 7      I,  18|       number-each being a starting point. If, then, we render as
 8      I,  18|   startingpoint of number, and the point the startingpoint of a line.
 9     II,  2 |  definition be rendered whole, the point at issue is not cleared
10     II,  3 |           man will object that the point which he himself questioned
11     II,  3 |      discussed, but only the other point. This commonplace rule is
12     II,  5 |       apparent necessity, when the point to which the discussion
13     II,  5 |         remaining case is when the point to which the discussion
14     II,  7 |           merely have gone to this point, that it is possible for
15    III,  2 |         scale. Our survey from the point of view of consequences
16    III,  6 |           should either admit your point universally, or else bring
17     IV,  5 |         this instance to admit the point that wind is "air in motion",
18     IV,  6 |     species mentioned. Examine the point by seeing whether the objects
19      V,  6 |              6~Next, look from the point of view of the respective
20      V,  6 |         Secondly (h) look from the point of view of relative opposites
21      V,  6 |          have.~Next, look from the point of view of positive and
22      V,  6 |             and first (a) from the point of view of the predicates
23      V,  6 |         Secondly (b) look from the point of view of the predicates,
24      V,  6 |          Thirdly (c) look from the point of view of the subjects
25      V,  6 |      property.~Next, look from the point of view of the coordinate
26      V,  6 |       desire".~Next, look from the point of view of the inflexions,
27      V,  7 |              7~Next, look from the point of view of things that are
28      V,  7 |         health.~Next look from the point of view of things that are
29      V,  8 |               8~Next look from the point of view of greater and less
30      V,  8 |         all these matters from the point of view of the others as
31      V,  8 |        animal.~Next, look from the point of view of the attributes
32      V,  8 |        manner,’ because the former point is secured by analogy, not
33     VI,  4 | intelligible than the posterior, a point, for instance, than a line,
34     VI,  4 |             and a line more than a point; for most people learn things
35     VI,  4 |           this kind are those of a point, a line, and a plane, all
36     VI,  4 |     posterior; for they say that a point is the limit of a line,
37    VII,  1 |          cases.~Moreover, from the point of view of "degrees", see
38    VII,  3 |      Moreover, look at it from the point of view of its inflexions
39    VII,  3 |      Moreover, look at it from the point of view of things that stand
40    VII,  3 |      Moreover, look at it from the point of and like degrees, in
41    VII,  3 |          This examination from the point of view of greater degrees
42    VII,  5 |            essence of a thing. The point is clear also from the following:
43    VII,  5 |    sufficient to argue against one point only (for if we have overthrown
44    VII,  5 |         have overthrown any single point whatsoever, we shall have
45    VII,  5 |            necessity to show one’s point universally: for it is enough
46   VIII,  1 |      though you really require the point: for insistence always arouses
47   VIII,  1 |            one should put last the point which one most wishes to
48   VIII,  2 |            against the crowd. This point has been treated previously
49   VIII,  2 |     questioner should withdraw the point objected to, and form the
50   VIII,  2 |            we have to withdraw the point objected to; for when it
51   VIII,  2 |            he refuses to admit the point because he foresees something
52   VIII,  2 |            of the kind: for if the point objected to be withdrawn,
53   VIII,  3 |        harder task to argue to the point claimed, i.e. the premiss,
54   VIII,  5 |       grant or refuse to grant the point asked, is himself. If, again,
55   VIII,  10|        solution is to demolish the point on which the fallacy that
56   VIII,  10|           demolition of any random point is no solution, even though
57   VIII,  10|          solution, even though the point demolished be false. For
58   VIII,  10|            it may be true that the point claimed is false; but it
59   VIII,  10|             who has demolished the point on which the fallacy depends,
60   VIII,  10|           it is on such and such a point that the argument depends,
61   VIII,  10|      enough to object, even if the point demolished be a falsehood,
62   VIII,  10|          either by demolishing the point on which the falsehood that
63   VIII,  11|        answer or to understand the point of the questioner’s inquiry.
64   VIII,  11|        brings people to accept his point from opinions that are as
65   VIII,  13|            any one begs the actual point requiring to be shown: this
66   VIII,  14|           arguments for carrying a point by sheer force, and in refutation
67   VIII,  14|          or some one else) and the point which made it the one or