Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  4 |         or definition or genus or accident. Do not let any one suppose
 2      I,  5 |          property", "genus", and "accident". A "definition" is a phrase
 3      I,  5 |        not in the same genus.~An "accident" is (i) something which,
 4      I,  5 |      white. Of the definitions of accident the second is the better:
 5      I,  5 |          the term in question. To Accident are to be attached also
 6      I,  5 |          is nothing to prevent an accident from becoming a temporary
 7      I,  5 |         the sitting posture is an accident, but will be a temporary
 8      I,  5 |          is nothing to prevent an accident from becoming both a relative
 9      I,  6 |        property" and "genus" and "accident" will be applicable to "
10      I,  6 |   remarked also in the case of an accident, we shall have demolished
11      I,  7 |           to some term drawn from Accident, as when the creature who
12      I,  7 |     object by its name and by its accident.~
13      I,  8 |        from its genus or from its accident. Another way to confirm
14      I,  8 |            clearly it would be an accident, for accident was said’
15      I,  8 |         would be an accident, for accident was said’ to be what belongs
16      I,  9 |      Activity, Passivity. For the accident and genus and property and
17     II,  1 |           drawn from the element "accident" is an extremely precarious
18     II,  2 |          a man has ascribed as an accident what belongs in some other
19     II,  2 |         colour does not happen by accident to white, but colour is
20     II,  2 |          rendered the genus as an accident; e.g. suppose that one were
21     II,  2 |          then he renders it as an accident.~Another rule is to examine
22     II,  2 |       make definitions both of an accident and of its subject, either
23     II,  3 |          for it is because of the accident of the equilateral triangle
24     II,  6 |           stated a thing to be an accident of itself, taking it to
25     II,  7 |          thesis.~Moreover, if the accident of a thing have a contrary,
26     II,  7 |          the subject to which the accident in question has been declared
27     II,  7 |            if there be posited an accident which has a contrary, look
28     II,  7 |          that which admits of the accident will admit of its contrary
29     II,  7 |       help you to assert that the accident actually belongs, it will
30     II,  7 |      admit of the contrary of the accident asserted, we shall have
31     II,  7 |         shall have shown that the accident neither belongs nor can
32     II,  7 |           yet have shown that the accident asserted does belong as
33     II,  10|         for if an increase of the accident follows an increase of the
34     II,  10|         we have said, clearly the accident belongs; while if it does
35     II,  10|           it does not follow, the accident does not belong. You should
36    III,  6 |           is possible to make the accident definite either specifically
37    III,  6 |         number.~In regard then to Accident, you should set to work
38     IV,  1 |         happens in the case of an accident: e.g. if "good" be laid
39     IV,  1 |    category of essence, but as an accident, as "white" is predicated
40     IV,  1 |         object": its motion is an accident of it, as it often is of
41     IV,  1 |         look at the definition of Accident, and see whether it fits
42     IV,  1 |    attributes is the genus but an accident, since we were saying that
43     IV,  1 |      since we were saying that an accident is an attribute which can
44     IV,  4 |          described in the case of Accident: e.g. if the pleasant be
45     IV,  4 |          common to the subject of Accident as well: for it is all the
46     IV,  4 |           to allege that it is an accident of it. For if in any way
47     IV,  5 |       useful also in dealing with Accident: for the accident and that
48     IV,  5 |    dealing with Accident: for the accident and that of which it is
49     IV,  5 |        and that of which it is an accident are both found in the same
50     IV,  5 |       thing, clearly it is not an accident.~Again, see if the species
51      V,  1 | commonplace arguments relating to Accident, to see whether it belongs
52      V,  4 |       useful also in dealing with Accident: for the same attributes
53      V,  4 |         something qualified by an accident will also belong to the
54      V,  4 |           will also belong to the accident taken along with the subject
55      V,  4 |      thing when combined with its accident, saying, for example, that "
56      V,  4 |        say that the subject of an accident is not absolutely different
57      V,  4 |     absolutely different from the accident taken along with its subject;
58     VI,  1 |  commonplace rules that relate to Accident. For there too the question
59     VI,  1 |         whenever we argue that an accident belongs, we declare it to
60     VI,  5 |            but the former only by accident: for it is absolutely alien
61     VI,  6 |       differentia belongs only by accident to the object defined. For
62    VII,  1 |       they are accidents: for any accident belonging to the one must
63    VII,  1 |          belong to anything as an accident, so must the other also.
64    VII,  5 |        belong as a genus, nor the accident as a genus or property,
65    VII,  5 |        whereas in the case of the accident it is enough to show merely
66    VII,  5 |          material: for in stating accident a man does not add how the