Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  10| propositions which contradict the contraries of opinions that are taken
 2      I,  10|     opinion that the knowledge of contraries is the same, it might probably
 3      I,  10|       also that the perception of contraries is the same: also, supposing
 4      I,  10|    propositions contradicting the contraries of general opinions will
 5      I,  10|     course of the discussion upon contraries. Clearly also, all opinions
 6      I,  14|           e.g. "The perception of contraries is the same"-the knowledge
 7      I,  14|           next, "The knowledge of contraries is the same", and that "
 8      I,  15|        original terms or of their contraries: for the contrary also of
 9      I,  15|           some meanings and their contraries have an intermediate, others
10     II,  2 |         relative opposites and of contraries and of terms signifying
11     II,  3 |           ends, as the science of contraries is said to be the same (
12     II,  3 |       said to be the same (for of contraries the one is no more an end
13     II,  7 |                     7~Inasmuch as contraries can be conjoined with each
14     II,  7 |         must grasp the subject of contraries, in order that it may help
15     II,  7 |            we shall find that the contraries of each of the others also
16     II,  7 |    therefore whichever of the two contraries is useful in attacking the
17     II,  7 |          the same thing admits of contraries. Thus (e.g.) if he has asserted
18     II,  8 |           also at the case of the contraries of S and P in the thesis,
19     II,  8 |      however, rare in the case of contraries; usually the sequence is
20     II,  8 |          other in the case of the contraries, it must of necessity do
21     II,  8 |        like manner to the case of contraries. Only, in the case of such
22     II,  9 |      dealing with the sequence of contraries; for all we are claiming
23    III,  2 |  generations and acquisitions and contraries of things: for things whose
24    III,  2 |          also with the losses and contraries of things; for a thing whose
25    III,  5 |         from admixture with their contraries; e.g. that is whiter which
26     IV,  3 |          to have no contrary; for contraries ought to be found in the
27     IV,  3 |        something, and one pair of contraries have an intermediary, but
28     IV,  6 |          places the better of the contraries inside the worse genus:
29     IV,  6 |      remaining genus, seeing that contraries are found in contrary genera,
30      V,  6 |        first (a) from that of the contraries, and see, for destructive
31     VI,  2 |      rendered also indicate their contraries as well. Or, again, see
32     VI,  9 |       drawn from consideration of contraries and of coordinates.~Moreover,
33     VI,  9 |           the same way, too, with contraries. For to the contrary term
34     VI,  9 |          one of the ways in which contraries are conjoined. Thus (e.g.)
35     VI,  9 |         Seeing, moreover, that of contraries, the one is sometimes a
36     VI,  9 |      however, that neither of the contraries be so formed as to denote
37     VI,  14|         the nature of a thing two contraries are equally liable to occur,
38    VII,  3 |          have to examine into the contraries and other opposites of the
39    VII,  3 |         us. Seeing, however, that contraries may be conjoined in more
40    VII,  3 |         have to select from those contraries the one whose contrary definition
41    VII,  3 |           the contrary genus: for contraries must of necessity be either
42    VII,  3 |            that are predicated of contraries we expect to be contrary,
43    VII,  3 |           should be predicated of contraries, unless the contraries be
44    VII,  3 |         of contraries, unless the contraries be found within the same
45    VII,  3 |       whose genera are themselves contraries it may very well be that
46    VII,  3 |          that the differentiae of contraries are either contrary or else
47    VII,  3 |        same is not possible; else contraries will have the same definition.~
48   VIII,  1 |   admission that the knowledge of contraries is one, one should ask him
49   VIII,  1 |        ask him to admit it not of contraries, but of opposites: for,
50   VIII,  1 |       argue that the knowledge of contraries is also the same, seeing
51   VIII,  1 |        also the same, seeing that contraries are opposites; if he does
52   VIII,  1 |           some particular pair of contraries. For one must secure the
53   VIII,  1 |        knowledge and ignorance of contraries is the same, so too perception
54   VIII,  1 |        same, so too perception of contraries is the same; or vice versa,
55   VIII,  3 |       many?": here when the term "contraries" has been properly defined,
56   VIII,  3 |        same thing to have several contraries or not: in the same way
57   VIII,  5 |        admit the impossibility of contraries belonging at the same time
58   VIII,  13|    original question and also beg contraries the true account has been
59   VIII,  13|       prove that the knowledge of contraries is one and were to claim
60   VIII,  13|        show that the knowledge of contraries is always one, and begged
61   VIII,  13|     begged it of certain pairs of contraries: for he also is generally
62   VIII,  13|       ways in which people assume contraries are equal in number to those
63   VIII,  13|     secured that the knowledge of contraries is one, he were to claim
64   VIII,  13|        from them. The securing of contraries differs from begging the
65   VIII,  14|           both relative terms and contraries and co-ordinates.~Records