Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  5 |  overthrow it.~A "property" is a predicate which does not indicate
 2      I,  5 |          than A is a convertible predicate of A is clear: for it does
 3      I,  5 |        which of the two does the predicate in question happen (accidit)
 4      I,  8 |     through reasoning. For every predicate of a subject must of necessity
 5      I,  9 |        one of the other types of predicate. It is clear, too, on the
 6      I,  9 |        one of the other types of predicate. For when man is set before
 7      I,  9 |       for each of these kinds of predicate, if either it be asserted
 8      I,  9 |          other hand, one kind of predicate is asserted of another kind,
 9      I,  9 |        one of the other kinds of predicate. Such, then, and so many,
10      I,  10|        opinion that the contrary predicate belongs to the contrary
11     II,  1 |        when we have shown that a predicate belongs in every case, we
12     II,  1 |     introduce theses asserting a predicate than denying it, while those
13     II,  2 |      walking is in motion. For a predicate drawn from the genus is
14     II,  2 |        examine all cases where a predicate has been either asserted
15     II,  2 |           Likewise, also, if the predicate belongs in no case. This
16     II,  2 |        suggested a division, the predicate appears to hold in all or
17     II,  2 |          look into cases where a predicate has been attributed or denied
18     II,  9 |       contrary, for the contrary predicate: e.g. argue that good is
19     II,  10|          a greater degree of the predicate follows a greater degree
20     II,  10|          Another rule is: If one predicate be attributed to two subjects;
21     II,  10|       neither does the remaining predicate belong to the remaining
22     II,  10|        so too does the remaining predicate to the remaining subject.~
23     II,  10|           For supposing that one predicate belongs, or is supposed
24     II,  10|         subjects; for if the one predicate does not belong to the one
25     II,  10|       neither does the remaining predicate belong to the remaining
26     II,  10|        subject, while if the one predicate does belong to the one subject,
27     II,  10|       one subject, the remaining predicate belongs to the remaining
28     II,  11|          whole white.~Again, any predicate of which we can speak of
29     II,  11|       time and place: for if the predicate be possible in some respect,
30     IV,  1 |     object of opinion" will be a predicate of what does not exist;
31     IV,  5 |         genus rendered is a true predicate. For in some cases, e.g. "
32     IV,  6 |       the differentia, too, is a predicate of the various species in
33      V,  2 |          for each term is a true predicate of fire alone); and so it
34      V,  3 |          he has rendered forms a predicate convertible with its subject,
35      V,  4 |        property. Thus (e.g.) the predicate "living creature" is true
36      V,  4 |        true of that of which the predicate "living creature" is true;
37      V,  4 |   subject as the property of its predicate, "fire" could not be a property
38      V,  5 |         yet stated a convertible predicate: for then what is stated
39      V,  5 |       has rendered a convertible predicate, so that "animate substance"
40      V,  7 |     destructive purposes, if the predicate that is identically related
41      V,  7 |        for then neither will the predicate that is identically related
42      V,  7 |           on the other hand, the predicate which is identically related
43      V,  7 | identically related" is a single predicate in process of comparison
44      V,  7 | destructive purposes, see if the predicate qualified by the verb "to
45      V,  7 |         the verb "to be" has the predicate set down as so qualified,
46      V,  7 |         to become" will have the predicate qualified by "to become"
47      V,  7 |         have as its property the predicate rendered with this qualification.
48      V,  7 |      that character of which the predicate in question has been stated
49      V,  8 | destructive purposes, see if the predicate fails to be a property of
50     VI,  3 |  absurdity. For "biped" is not a predicate of "walking animal": if
51     VI,  3 |         biped" is only used as a predicate once. Likewise also in the
52     VI,  6 |      differentia itself which we predicate of the species. For if "
53    VII,  1 |          anywhere in any sort of predicate of each term, and in the
54    VII,  1 |         of whatever the one is a predicate, the other should be a predicate
55    VII,  1 | predicate, the other should be a predicate of it as well.~Moreover,
56    VII,  5 |       establish is an accidental predicate: for in other cases one
57    VII,  5 |        to show not only that the predicate belongs, but also that it
58    VII,  5 |        other hand, an accidental predicate is the hardest thing to
59    VII,  5 |         man does not add how the predicate belongs; and accordingly,
60    VII,  5 |          showing either that the predicate does not belong, or that
61    VII,  5 |        the case of an accidental predicate the only way to demolish