Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  1 |           then, we must say what reasoning is, and what its varieties
 2      I,  1 |       order to grasp dialectical reasoning: for this is the object
 3      I,  1 |          treatise before us.~Now reasoning is an argument in which,
 4      I,  1 |         premisses from which the reasoning starts are true and primary,
 5      I,  1 |        are primary and true: (b) reasoning, on the other hand, is "
 6      I,  1 |  illustrious of them. Again (c), reasoning is "contentious" if it starts
 7      I,  1 |    really deserves to be called "reasoning" as well, but the other
 8      I,  1 |    should be called "contentious reasoning", but not "reasoning", since
 9      I,  1 | contentious reasoning", but not "reasoning", since it appears to reason,
10      I,  1 |       sciences. For this form of reasoning appears to differ from the
11      I,  1 |         them-but he conducts his reasoning upon assumptions which,
12      I,  1 |         survey of the species of reasoning. In general, in regard both
13      I,  8 |         to confirm it is through reasoning. For every predicate of
14      I,  12|          Induction, on the other Reasoning. Now what reasoning is has
15      I,  12|        other Reasoning. Now what reasoning is has been said before:
16      I,  12|          the mass of men, though reasoning is more forcible and effective
17      I,  18|          and to mislead by false reasoning: for if we know the number
18      I,  18|         never be misled by false reasoning, but shall know if the questioner
19      I,  18|          is. That it helps us in reasoning about sameness and difference
20     IV,  5 |         is not pain. By the same reasoning, neither is conviction conception:
21     IV,  5 |       for shame is found in the "reasoning" faculty, whereas fear is
22     IV,  5 |          is always found in the "reasoning" faculty. This commonplace
23      V,  1 |          and in those who have a reasoning faculty. A "permanent" property
24      V,  1 |        the latter obeys: for the reasoning faculty does not always
25      V,  8 |         the faculty of desire as reasoning’ is a property of the faculty
26      V,  8 |        of the faculty of desire, reasoning could not be a property
27     VI,  6 |       soul," rather than of the "reasoning faculty": for "wisdom" is
28     VI,  6 |          virtue primarily of the reasoning faculty: for it is in virtue
29     VI,  9 |       the soul", and not in the "reasoning faculty": for if in any
30     VI,  13|    defined as "daring with right reasoning": here it is possible that
31     VI,  13|     daring in robbery, and right reasoning in regard to the means of
32     VI,  13|    exhibit both daring and right reasoning in respect of medical treatment),
33    VII,  3 |        arrive at a definition by reasoning: they always assume something
34    VII,  3 |          reached by a process of reasoning is obvious. The means whereby
35    VII,  5 |         establishing a case, the reasoning brought forward must be
36    VII,  5 |        all those other points by reasoning (i.e. that the attributes
37   VIII,  1 |    himself: the premisses of his reasoning, although true and familiar,
38   VIII,  1 |         through which the actual reasoning is constructed. Those which
39   VIII,  1 |      premisses through which the reasoning is effected, ought not to
40   VIII,  1 |    necessary premisses either by reasoning or by induction, or else
41   VIII,  2 |  syllogism should be employed in reasoning against dialecticians rather
42   VIII,  2 |       difference which method of reasoning be adopted, but in argument
43   VIII,  2 |         in argument with another reasoning per impossibile should be
44   VIII,  2 |         head, it looks as if the reasoning had failed. For often, even
45   VIII,  2 |       looks altogether as if the reasoning had failed.~Not every universal
46   VIII,  2 |          he fails to reason: for reasoning always consists of a small
47   VIII,  8 |                   8~A premiss in reasoning always either is one of
48   VIII,  8 |      constituent elements in the reasoning, or else goes to establish
49   VIII,  8 |        above, so as to wreck the reasoning.~
50   VIII,  11|         second is, supposing the reasoning, though constructed from
51   VIII,  11|          must not claim that the reasoning to a proposed view shall
52   VIII,  11|      suit.~It is also a fault in reasoning when a man shows something
53   VIII,  11|      lies the viciousness of the reasoning? Simply in that it conceals
54   VIII,  12|          is called "contentious" reasoning: (2) when it comes to a
55   VIII,  14|       will make a man readier in reasoning, because he has his premisses
56   VIII,  14|       your training in inductive reasoning against a young man, in