Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  5 |           thing being at one time white, and at another not white.
 2      I,  5 |         white, and at another not white. Of the definitions of accident
 3      I,  9 |           a substance; but when a white colour is set before him
 4      I,  9 |        that what is set there is "white" or is "a colour", he states
 5      I,  11|           to know whether snow is white or not need perception.
 6      I,  14|           of "good and evil", of "white and black", or "cold and
 7      I,  15|            e.g. of a "clear (lit. white) body" of a "clear note".
 8      I,  15|        e.g.) with a "clear" (lit. white) sound and a "clear" garment,
 9      I,  15|            as (e.g.) clear’ (lit. white) as applied to a body is
10     II,  1 |          order to show that he is white or just; for it is open
11     II,  1 |     dispute it and say that he is white or just in part only. Conversion,
12     II,  2 |           if one were to say that white happens (accidit) to be
13     II,  2 |         not happen by accident to white, but colour is its genus.
14     II,  2 |           therefore who says that white is "coloured" has not rendered "
15     II,  2 |       whereas many things besides white are coloured, e.g. a log,
16     II,  11|          makes that other good or white, whereas formerly it was
17     II,  11|       whereas formerly it was not white or good, then the thing
18     II,  11|           the thing added will be white or good-it will possess
19     II,  11|         more than the addition of white to black makes the whole
20     II,  11|          to black makes the whole white.~Again, any predicate of
21     II,  11|        less degrees of good or of white will not be attributed to
22     II,  11| attributed to what is not good or white: for a bad thing will never
23    III,  1 |         the generic name; e.g. a "white man" is not "a colour".
24    III,  5 |        e.g. if the definition of "white" be "a colour which pierces
25     IV,  1 |           but as an accident, as "white" is predicated of "snow",
26     IV,  1 |           snow" is not a kind of "white", and therefore "white"
27     IV,  1 |            white", and therefore "white" is not the genus of snow,
28     IV,  1 |           to it. Likewise, also, "white": for it indicates not the
29     IV,  1 |        for it to be and not to be white. So that neither of these
30     IV,  1 |          each a substance, while "white" is not a substance but
31     IV,  1 |           but a quality, so that "white" is not the genus either
32     IV,  1 |      should be a quality; e.g. if white be a quality, so too should
33     IV,  3 |          as (e.g.) in the case of white and black: for "colour"
34     IV,  5 |         well: e.g. what contains "white" contains "colour" as well,
35     IV,  6 |  different from one another, e.g. white objects: for these do not
36     IV,  6 |        always different, so that "white" could not be the genus
37     IV,  6 |        species, as it is used of "white" in the case of snow, thus
38     IV,  6 |         For both "beautiful" and "white" admit of a greater degree,
39      V,  4 |         man" will belong also to "white man", if there be a white
40      V,  4 |         white man", if there be a white man, and one that belongs
41      V,  4 |          and one that belongs to "white man" will belong also to "
42      V,  4 |            man" is one thing, and white man’ another, and moreover
43      V,  4 |         man to be a man and for a white man to be a white man. Moreover,
44      V,  4 |           for a white man to be a white man. Moreover, you should
45     VI,  11|       e.g. "pellucid mortal" for "white man": for it is no definition,
46     VI,  12|  definition is not, e.g. Suppose "white" to be defined as "colour
47     VI,  12|         could not exist, whereas "white" does exist.~Moreover, those
48     VI,  12|       should not be both real and white and good, so that it would
49    VII,  3 |           contrary, e.g. those of white and black, for the one tends