Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  15|          of terms that denote the privation or presence of a certain
 2      I,  15|         question depends upon the privation or presence of a certain
 3     II,  2 |           of terms signifying the privation or presence of certain states,
 4     II,  8 |       look also into cases of the privation or presence of a state in
 5     II,  8 | opposition of the presence to the privation of a state: for the one
 6     II,  8 |          state, and the other the privation of it.~The case of relative
 7     II,  8 |           that of a state and its privation: for the sequence of these
 8     IV,  4 |      opposite of the species be a privation, there are two ways of demolishing
 9     IV,  4 |          rendered: for either the privation is to be found absolutely
10     IV,  4 |           Secondly, if there be a privation opposed to both genus and
11      V,  6 |         described in terms of the privation (of X) be a property of
12      V,  6 |           X) be a property of the privation (of Y). Also if, on the
13      V,  6 |         described in terms of the privation (of X) be not a property
14      V,  6 |           a property of the given privation (of Y), neither will the
15      V,  6 |         described in terms of the privation (of X) will be a property
16      V,  6 |         will be a property of the privation (of Y). Also, if an attribute
17      V,  6 |           described in terms of a privation (of X) be a property of
18      V,  6 |           X) be a property of the privation (of Y), then also the attribute
19     VI,  3 |        say that "cooling" is "the privation of natural heat". For all
20     VI,  3 |         of natural heat". For all privation is a privation of some natural
21     VI,  3 |            For all privation is a privation of some natural attribute,
22     VI,  3 |          have been enough to say "privation of heat", for the word "
23     VI,  3 |           of heat", for the word "privation" shows of itself that the
24     VI,  9 |         word forced to denote the privation of the other, as (e.g.)
25     VI,  9 |          generally held to be the privation of equality (for "unequal"
26     VI,  9 |   contrary whose form denotes the privation must of necessity be defined
27     VI,  9 |        one whose form denotes the privation; for else we should find
28     VI,  9 |    through the term which denotes privation of it. Moreover, a man who
29     VI,  9 |            is the same as to say "privation of equality". Therefore
30     VI,  9 |           be "the contrary of the privation of equality", so that he
31     VI,  9 |         be so formed as to denote privation, but yet the definition
32     VI,  9 |           a term formed to denote privation, he has failed to render
33     VI,  9 |           term of which it is the privation, e.g. the state, or contrary,
34     VI,  9 |          whatever it may be whose privation it is: also if he has omitted
35     VI,  9 |          term at all in which the privation is naturally formed, or
36     VI,  9 |         in defining "ignorance" a privation he has failed to say that
37     VI,  9 |      failed to say that it is the privation of "knowledge"; or has failed
38     VI,  9 |          that "blindness" is the "privation of sight in an eye": for
39     VI,  9 |      state both of what it is the privation and what it is that is deprived.~
40     VI,  9 |      defined by the expression "a privation" a term that is not used
41     VI,  9 |           is not used to denote a privation: thus a mistake of this
42     VI,  9 |         not used to denote a mere privation of knowledge.~