Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  11|         problem, is clear: for it follows of necessity from what has
 2      I,  15|         more than one meaning, it follows necessarily that "to see"
 3      I,  18|          means are useful, are as follows.~ ~
 4     II,  4 |         whose reality necessarily follows if the thing in question
 5     II,  4 |          for if we show that what follows from the thing in question
 6     II,  7 |     unmoved: for when we move, it follows necessarily that all that
 7     II,  7 |          has asserted that hatred follows anger, hatred would in that
 8     II,  8 |         is converse: for "animal" follows upon "man but ‘not-animal"
 9     II,  8 |           the contrary of the one follows upon the contrary of the
10     II,  8 |       upon the one of them virtue follows, and vice upon the other;
11     II,  8 |        other; and upon the one it follows that it is desirable, while
12     II,  8 |           while upon the other it follows that it is objectionable.
13     II,  8 |       such a case as this: Health follows upon vigour, but disease
14     II,  8 |         debility; rather debility follows upon disease. In this case,
15     II,  8 |         direct: e.g. as sensation follows sight, while absence of
16     II,  8 |        while absence of sensation follows blindness. For the opposition
17     II,  10|           degree of the predicate follows a greater degree of the
18     II,  10|          increase of the accident follows an increase of the subject,
19    III,  2 |          e.g. if a man learns, it follows that he was ignorant before
20     IV,  6 |   differentia some attribute that follows everything, clearly the
21     IV,  6 |            be some attribute that follows everything, the denotation
22     IV,  6 |       distinguish whatever always follows along with a thing, and
23     IV,  6 |          it, from its genus, if A follows B universally, whereas B
24     IV,  6 | universally-as e.g. "rest" always follows a "calm" and "divisibility"
25     IV,  6 |          calm" and "divisibility" follows "number", but not conversely (
26     IV,  6 |         that the one which always follows is the genus, whenever the
27     IV,  6 |           that "not-being" always follows what is "coming to be" (
28      V,  3 |    property something that always follows, and so the property of
29      V,  3 |        some attribute that always follows. In the second place, a
30      V,  8 |           to breathe it and so it follows that "breathable" could
31     VI,  4 |         no, should be examined as follows: First of all, see if he
32     VI,  6 |   differentia is true, it clearly follows that the species must be
33    VII,  1 |        nor yet "Spartan"; it only follows that the one must be included
34    VII,  3 |       said, and also in detail as follows. First of all, see that
35   VIII,  1 |           them respectively is as follows: Induction should proceed
36   VIII,  1 |       from which that necessarily follows: for people are more willing
37   VIII,  2 |      those who do not see that it follows upon the previous admissions
38   VIII,  2 |    without even saying that it so follows, and the other denies it,
39   VIII,  6 |     granted the conclusion sought follows, should yet protest that
40   VIII,  10|       sitting": for from these it follows that "Socrates is writing".
41   VIII,  11|         to make his postulates as follows: "x-in-itself is more fully
42   VIII,  14|        that were conceded: for it follows necessarily that if the