Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  14|     should be taken in their most universal form; then, the one should
 2      I,  18|        that we claim to bring the universal in evidence: for it is not
 3     II,  1 |            1~Of problems some are universal, others particular. Universal
 4     II,  1 |     universal, others particular. Universal problems are such as "Every
 5     II,  1 |           such are common to both universal and particular problems,
 6     II,  3 |         shall have demolished the universal assertion of it, and likewise
 7     II,  3 |       case, we shall demolish the universal denial of it. Whereas in
 8     II,  6 |         denied an attribute to be universal which is universal, and
 9     II,  6 |          to be universal which is universal, and so has made a mistake:
10    III,  5 |     actual rules given above more universal by a slight alteration of
11    III,  6 |           particular and not in a universal form, in the first place
12    III,  6 |            in the first place the universal constructive or destructive
13    III,  6 |           admission should make a universal admission, inasmuch as he
14    III,  6 |         belong, as in the case of universal questions. Moreover, you
15      V,  2 |    property any such term as is a universal attribute. For one which
16      V,  2 |          viz. "unity", which is a universal attribute; and therefore
17     VI,  3 |     natural heat.~Again, see if a universal have been mentioned and
18     VI,  3 |          the particular after the universal has been already stated.
19    VII,  5 |           brought forward must be universal: for the definition put
20    VII,  5 |          overthrow something by a universal proposition, not even so
21    VII,  5 |          accidental attribute the universal proposition is easier to
22   VIII,  1 |         inductively to secure the universal premiss being granted, or
23   VIII,  1 |           individual cases to the universal and from the known to the
24   VIII,  1 |     wherever possible, secure the universal premiss by a definition
25   VIII,  1 | admissions are plausible, and the universal involved is less patent;
26   VIII,  1 |        for in induction it is the universal whose admission is secured
27   VIII,  1 |        what is secured is not the universal under which all the like
28   VIII,  2 |           ask the question in its universal form, but in others this
29   VIII,  2 |         people need to secure the universal, they use the phrase "in
30   VIII,  2 |     answerer refuses to grant the universal proposition, then it is
31   VIII,  2 |      People sometimes object to a universal proposition, and bring their
32   VIII,  2 |         form the remainder into a universal proposition, until he secures
33   VIII,  2 |   reasoning had failed.~Not every universal question can form a dialectical
34   VIII,  8 |          rule people secure their universal by means either of induction
35   VIII,  8 |           other hand, against the universal one should try to bring
36   VIII,  8 |          man refuses to grant the universal when supported by many instances,
37   VIII,  14|       arguments that are entirely universal, e.g. the statement that "
38   VIII,  14|   discussions should be made in a universal form, even though one has
39   VIII,  14|   demonstration always contains a universal demonstration, because it
40   VIII,  14|          These are those that are universal, and those in regard to