Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  5 |             they may, clearly do not render the definition of the thing
 2      I,  15|              but we must also try to render their definitions; e.g.
 3      I,  18|         starting point. If, then, we render as the genus what is common
 4      I,  18| Definition-mongers too nearly always render them in this way: they declare
 5    III,  3 |             greater degree, or if it render good the better and more
 6    III,  5 |         instances. It is possible to render some of the actual rules
 7     IV,  1 |              e.g. if any one were to render anything as genus of ‘being"
 8     IV,  5 |          sometimes in converse order render genus as differentia, and
 9      V,  1 |           For if he at the same time render this property of one thing
10      V,  1 |              If on the other hand he render one apiece of two attributes
11      V,  1 |              in the market-place.~To render a property "relatively"
12      V,  2 |            inevitable that those who render a property after this fashion
13      V,  2 |            happen if any one were to render, as a property of fire, "
14      V,  2 |            happen if any one were to render, as a property of earth, "
15      V,  3 |           procedure for everybody to render as property some attribute
16      V,  4 |       several senses, it is a job to render to a sophistical questioner
17      V,  5 |           see if, while intending to render an attribute that naturally
18      V,  5 |           property of man intends to render the attribute that naturally
19      V,  5 |           hand, see if he intends to render the property that naturally
20      V,  5 |           themselves, it is a job to render the property of such things.
21      V,  5 |              such things. For if you render a property as belonging
22      V,  5 |          body as well; whereas if he render it of "body", it will be
23      V,  5 |               For every one tries to render as the property of a thing
24      V,  8 |             property. For people who render the property in that way
25      V,  8 |            supposing any one were to render "the lightest body" as a
26     VI,  4 |        individuals would not have to render the same definition at all
27     VI,  5 |             things, he has failed to render it in relation to all of
28     VI,  6 |              see if he has failed to render the differentia of a relative
29     VI,  8 |           Ideas, even though he does render the word in question: for
30     VI,  9 |          privation, he has failed to render the term of which it is
31     VI,  9 |            added this, has failed to render the thing in which it is
32     VI,  10|         thing only, and therefore to render the definition in this way
33     VI,  10|             of the word, and wish to render the definition of the one
34     VI,  12|        Moreover, if the right way to render account of a thing be to
35     VI,  12|             account of a thing be to render it as it is not in itself
36     VI,  12|            be a correct rendering to render the object in relation to
37     VI,  12|           whatsoever of these, if to render what it is accidentally
38     VI,  12|     accidentally be a correct way to render it. It is, moreover, impossible
39   VIII,  1 |        conceal the conclusion, or to render the argument more clear.
40   VIII,  2 |          certainly will be unable to render one. Propositions that are