Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  18|         it is possible that the answerer and the questioner are not
 2      I,  18|     able to mislead him, if our answerer happens not to know the
 3     II,  5 |   really necessary whenever the answerer has denied any view that
 4     II,  5 |        necessary, and it is the answerer’s luck to be confuted on
 5     II,  5 |      this reason, moreover, the answerer should not lose his temper,
 6     VI,  10|       to the other, so that the answerer will be generally thought
 7     VI,  14|  proceed to examine it. For the answerer is bound either to accept
 8   VIII,  1 | familiar, may be refused by the answerer because they lie too near
 9   VIII,  1 |      this is likely to keep the answerer at the greatest possible
10   VIII,  1 |         it comes about; for the answerer does not foresee on what
11   VIII,  1 |        they often find that the answerer refuses to grant them because
12   VIII,  2 |       opportunity either to the answerer to dispute, and say that
13   VIII,  2 |       several cases and yet the answerer refuses to grant the universal
14   VIII,  4 |       is the business of a good answerer, as of a good questioner.
15   VIII,  4 |         argument as to make the answerer utter the most extrvagant
16   VIII,  4 |     position: while that of the answerer is to make it appear that
17   VIII,  5 |        other, while that of the answerer is to appear unaffected
18   VIII,  5 | articulate rules about what the answerer should aim at, and what
19   VIII,  5 |         thesis laid down by the answerer before facing the questioner’
20   VIII,  5 |      statement laid down by the answerer be generally rejected, the
21   VIII,  5 |        absolutely rejected, the answerer ought not to grant either
22   VIII,  5 |      statement laid down by the answerer be generally rejected, the
23   VIII,  5 |      not of this character, the answerer should not grant them. (
24   VIII,  5 |      statement laid down by the answerer be generally accepted without
25   VIII,  5 | qualification. Accordingly, the answerer should admit all views that
26   VIII,  5 |      statement laid down by the answerer be neither rejected generally
27   VIII,  5 |       the view laid down by the answerer be one that is generally
28   VIII,  5 |       rejected, but only by the answerer, then the standard whereby
29   VIII,  5 |         himself. If, again, the answerer be defending some one else’
30   VIII,  6 |      then, what the aims of the answerer should be, whether the position
31   VIII,  6 |    accepted and irrelevant, the answerer should grant it and remark
32   VIII,  6 |         generally rejected, the answerer, while admitting that if
33   VIII,  6 |    however, it be relevant, the answerer should add the comment that,
34   VIII,  6 |         collapses. For then the answerer will not be held to be personally
35   VIII,  7 |         several senses. For the answerer, if he does not understand,
36   VIII,  9 |      thesis or a definition the answerer should try his hand at attacking
37   VIII,  11|      not his position, when the answerer lies in wait for the points
38   VIII,  11|      whether he effects this as answerer or as questioner: for both
39   VIII,  11|  questioner has argued with the answerer in the best possible way:
40   VIII,  11|         for this rests with the answerer, because while refusing