Book, Paragraph

 1     II,  2|     whiteness is coloured or that walking is in motion. For a predicate
 2     IV,  1|           animal to walk or to be walking. Moreover, "moving" does
 3     IV,  2|       locomotion" as the genus of walking, it is not enough to show
 4     IV,  2|           not enough to show that walking is "motion" in order to
 5     IV,  2|        must show in addition that walking does not partake of any
 6     IV,  2|         the genus. If, therefore, walking does not partake either
 7     IV,  2|  locomotion would be the genus of walking.~Again, look among the things
 8     IV,  2|       rather some quality, as do "walking" and "biped".~Also, see
 9     IV,  2| locomotion always "carriage". For walking is not generally thought
10     IV,  6|          he who describes him as "walking"; also (c) that the differentia
11     IV,  6|     differentia: for he who says "walking" describes an animal of
12     IV,  6|       animal" does not describe a walking thing of a certain quality.~
13     IV,  6|         if what walks is moved in walking, then "walking" is a particular
14     IV,  6|           moved in walking, then "walking" is a particular kind of "
15      V,  1|          to any particular man of walking in the gymnasium.~[The rendering
16      V,  3|           a particular man "to be walking now", has made this distinction
17      V,  3|          property of man to be "a walking, biped animal" has rendered
18      V,  4|          as he who has said that "walking on two feet" is property
19      V,  4|         property as partaken of, "walking on two feet" could not be
20      V,  4|       possible for the attribute "walking through the market-place"
21      V,  4|          to the attribute "man", "walking through the market-place"
22      V,  4|          property of man to be a "walking biped," it would also be
23      V,  4|         belongs to many, as does "walking quadruped".~Inasmuch as "
24      V,  6|          Thus (e.g.) inasmuch as "walking biped" is a property of
25      V,  6|        man" to be described "as a walking biped". Not only in the
26     VI,  3|          with the object; e.g. "a walking biped animal six feet high":
27     VI,  3|         as man is a biped: but "a walking biped animal" is the same
28     VI,  3|        same as man, and therefore walking biped animal is a biped’.
29     VI,  3|            is not a predicate of "walking animal": if it were, then
30     VI,  3|          said to be a biped is "a walking biped animal", so that the
31     VI,  4|           also what "animal" and "walking" are), whereas if the genus
32     VI,  6|           instance, by the terms "walking", "flying", "aquatic", and "
33     VI,  6|         of "man" or "ox" or other walking animals, not of the actual
34     VI,  6|      imports its own genus, e.g. "walking" and "biped" import with
35     VI,  6|         of the same genus". Thus "walking animal" and "flying animal"
36     VI,  6|       with it either "flying" or "walking animal".~See, too, if he
37     VI,  6|    animals by means of the terms "walking" and "aquatic", on the ground
38     VI,  6|     aquatic", on the ground that "walking" and "aquatic" indicate
39     VI,  6|  differentia: for if there be no "walking", there will be no "man".