Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  5 |          it does not necessarily follow that if something is asleep
 2     II,  4 |       the thing in question will follow (for if the former be shown
 3     II,  7 |     desire-then hatred could not follow anger. Likewise also if
 4     II,  8 |        but ‘not-animal" does not follow upon "not-man", but conversely "
 5     II,  8 |     vigour, but disease does not follow upon debility; rather debility
 6     II,  8 |         of the one term does not follow upon the contrary of the
 7     II,  8 |        neither does the one term follow upon the other in the statement
 8     II,  9 |          the contrary of P shall follow the contrary of S.~Moreover,
 9     II,  10|    belongs; while if it does not follow, the accident does not belong.
10     II,  11|       thing at certain places to follow see and such a diet, e.g.
11    III,  6 |         belong: for then it will follow, by reason of the hypothesis,
12    III,  6 |          for in this way it will follow that it belongs to all instances.
13     IV,  2 |         are overthrowing a view, follow the rule as given: if establishing
14     IV,  3 |      genus, and see whether they follow likewise, both in demolishing
15     IV,  4 |   demolishing a view, you should follow the rule as stated; but
16     IV,  5 |        of the things in question follow in a certain sense upon
17     IV,  6 |        number of attributes that follow everything is comparatively
18     IV,  6 |        number of attributes that follow everything. If, therefore,
19     IV,  6 |        while if the genus do not follow everything, it will be still
20     IV,  6 |      view, therefore, you should follow the rule as stated. In establishing
21     IV,  6 |  universally, whereas B does not follow A universally-as e.g. "rest"
22      V,  1 |          not of necessity always follow; as, of some particular
23      V,  2 |        same results are bound to follow. Thus (e.g.) seeing that "
24      V,  3 |   something that does not always follow the subject but sometimes
25      V,  3 |       not always and necessarily follow. Thus (e.g.) any one who
26      V,  7 |          to the conclusions that follow from them, exactly as was
27     VI,  4 | differentia be known it does not follow of necessity that the species
28     VI,  6 |        case this result does not follow, owing to the ambiguity
29     VI,  13|        absurd; and yet this will follow if the one be temperate
30     VI,  13|        this does not necessarily follow, unless each be in itself
31    VII,  1 |        the same; for it does not follow because Peloponnesians and
32    VII,  1 |        life, so that it does not follow that, because they are both
33   VIII,  1 |         so he foresees what will follow if he grants them: but for
34   VIII,  1 |          the conclusion does not follow from their admissions: yet
35   VIII,  4 |       paradoxes that necessarily follow because of his position:
36   VIII,  10|        questioner wants does not follow from the questions he has
37   VIII,  11|          the conclusion too will follow suit.~It is also a fault
38   VIII,  13|        the first conclusion will follow from them. The securing
39   VIII,  14|          conclusion was bound to follow. Always, in dealing with