Book, Paragraph

 1     IV,  2 | immortal" is a differentia of "living being", seeing that of living
 2     IV,  2 |  living being", seeing that of living beings some are mortal and
 3      V,  1 |     God, of being an "immortal living being": a "temporary property"
 4      V,  1 |        else, as does "a mortal living being capable of receiving
 5      V,  1 |        body’, in the case of a living creature. A "temporary"
 6      V,  2 |    that it is a property of a "living creature" to "have a soul"
 7      V,  2 |  stated to be a property of a "living creature" to "have a soul".~
 8      V,  3 |     that it is a property of a living creature to be "compounded
 9      V,  3 |     respect the property of a "living creature" would have been
10      V,  3 |     that it is a property of a living creature to "have a soul"
11      V,  3 |        a soul" has not placed "living creature" within its essence,
12      V,  3 |       and so the property of a living creature could not have
13      V,  4 | inasmuch as the description "a living being that partakes of knowledge"
14      V,  4 |     predicated of God, to be a living being that partakes of knowledge’
15      V,  4 |     Thus (e.g.) the predicate "living creature" is true of that
16      V,  4 |        of which the predicate "living creature" is true; and so "
17      V,  4 |        would be a property of "living creature".~Next, for destructive
18      V,  5 |      absolutely, as "life" to "living being", or one that belongs
19      V,  5 |       to a particular kind of "living being". Accordingly he makes
20      V,  5 |       of a "particular kind of living being", or just of "living
21      V,  5 |     living being", or just of "living being. So he errs if he
22      V,  6 |     animate" is a property of "living creature", "inanimate" could
23      V,  6 |    could not be a property of "living creature".~Secondly (b)
24      V,  6 |        would be a property of "living being" "to live": also if
25      V,  6 |     seems to be a property of "living being" "to live", it will
26      V,  6 |     animate" is a property of "living creature", "animate" could
27      V,  6 |    e.g.) inasmuch as "sensible living being" is not a property
28      V,  6 |   property of any of the other living beings, "intelligible living
29      V,  6 |   living beings, "intelligible living being" could not be a property
30     VI,  6 |  immortal" to be defined as a "living thing immune at present
31     VI,  6 |       from destruction". For a living thing that is immune "at
32     VI,  6 |  Whenever, then, we say that a living thing is at present immune
33     VI,  6 |        that it is at present a living thing of such a kind as
34     VI,  10|  mortal" in his definitions of living creatures: for the Idea (
35     VI,  14|       of these things (e.g. "a living creature" as a "composition
36     VI,  14|     none is, and every kind of living creature, though a compound,