Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  5 |       is sometimes possible to define the meaning of a phrase
 2      I,  7 |         7~First of all we must define the number of senses borne
 3      I,  18|       object before us when we define it: for of the common predicates
 4     II,  1 |        accidents.~We must also define the errors that occur in
 5     II,  2 |     The assertor may of course define it so in so many words,
 6     II,  2 | argument.~Moreover, you should define what kind of things should
 7      V,  5 |        because of a failure to define how as well as to what things
 8      V,  5 |     this objection, but should define in what manner one states
 9     VI,  1 | cautions, he has yet failed to define the object, that is, to
10     VI,  4 |        that a man who does not define through terms of this kind
11     VI,  4 |      to observe that those who define in this way cannot show
12     VI,  4 |        nature of the term they define, unless it so happens that
13     VI,  4 |        correct definition must define a thing through its genus
14     VI,  4 |    then, that the right way to define is not through terms of
15     VI,  4 |        perhaps not possible to define some things in any other
16     VI,  5 |       of them; as (e.g.) if he define "grammar" as the "knowledge
17     VI,  6 |      negation, as those do who define line as "length without
18     VI,  6 |   differentia, as do those who define "contumely" as "insolence
19     VI,  6 |      Still, if any one were to define a strigil as an instrument
20     VI,  6 |     them. Moreover, people who define in this way put effect for
21     VI,  8 |       that it is not enough to define the ambitious man as him
22     VI,  8 |        again, people sometimes define night as a "shadow on the
23     VI,  9 |      supposing any one were to define equality as the contrary
24     VI,  10|      Again, if any one were to define a term used in several senses,
25     VI,  11|      does the whole definition define the whole complex. Suppose,
26     VI,  11|        this remainder does not define the remainder of the term.~
27     VI,  12|     such a definition does not define any science at all; for
28     VI,  12|       Sometimes, again, people define not the thing but only the
29     VI,  12|     else as well: but still to define what is desirable in itself
30     VI,  14|       you should also go on to define the kind of composition:
31     VI,  14|       any more a definition to define it through this one than
32    VII,  3 |       Further, if A’s claim to define a is like B’s to define
33    VII,  3 |        define a is like B’s to define B, and B defines B, then
34   VIII,  3 |       last are reached. Now to define first principles is just
35   VIII,  3 |     business must be either to define or to distinguish, or to
36   VIII,  4 |      of answers, we must first define what is the business of