Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  1 |  contentious arguments; for the nature of the fallacy in these
 2      I,  14|         also with problems. The nature of each of the aforesaid
 3     II,  11|   respect people may be good by nature, e.g. they may be generous
 4     II,  11| absolutely they are not good by nature, because no one is prudent
 5     II,  11|    because no one is prudent by nature. Likewise, also, it is possible
 6    III,  1 |          So too what is good by nature is more desirable than the
 7    III,  1 |      the good that is not so by nature, e.g. justice than the just
 8    III,  1 |          for the one is good by nature, whereas in the other case
 9    III,  4 |        we call the one good "by nature" and the other "not by nature":
10    III,  4 |   nature" and the other "not by nature": for dearly what is good
11    III,  4 |      for dearly what is good by nature is desirable.~
12    III,  5 |   expression, e.g. that what by nature exhibits such and such a
13    III,  5 |         what exhibits it not by nature. Also, if one thing does,
14      V,  1 |      property" of man to be "by nature a civilized animal": a "
15      V,  2 |       substance which is by its nature most easily of all bodies
16      V,  3 |        anything simultaneous by nature with it or posterior to
17      V,  3 |     opposite is simultaneous by nature with its opposite, and what
18      V,  3 |         what is simultaneous by nature or is posterior to it does
19      V,  3 |        general, simultaneous by nature with the subject, or posterior
20      V,  3 | opposite to, or simultaneous by nature with, or posterior to, the
21      V,  5 |        property that belongs by nature, and so "an animal capable
22      V,  8 |     tendency to move upwards by nature is a property of fire, and
23      V,  8 |     tendency to move upwards by nature would be a property of what
24     VI,  2 |       of the things that are by nature just. Such phrases are worse
25     VI,  3 |         the image of what is by nature noble and just"; for what
26     VI,  4 |       cannot show the essential nature of the term they define,
27     VI,  4 |      are always simultaneous by nature. Some people think, also,
28     VI,  4 |       genus are simultaneous by nature and "odd" and "even" are
29     VI,  6 |       which cannot see when its nature is to see. There is no difference
30     VI,  13|        if A and B cannot in the nature of things have a single
31     VI,  13|      has been defined is in the nature of things found primarily
32     VI,  14|        either.~Again, if in the nature of a thing two contraries
33   VIII,  3 |      stand last in the order of nature. For the former require
34   VIII,  3 |  definitions involved, e.g. the nature of a line or of a circle,
35   VIII,  11|       is a direct result of the nature of things that some subjects