Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  15|          call the raven a "flying biped animal", we declare it to
 2     II,  5 |          that it is animate and a biped and capable of acquiring
 3     IV,  2 |     quality, as do "walking" and "biped".~Also, see whether he has
 4      V,  1 |      relation to a horse, to be a biped. For one might try both
 5      V,  1 |          show that a man is not a biped, and also that a horse is
 6      V,  1 |        and also that a horse is a biped: in both ways the property
 7      V,  1 |      horse for the former to be a biped and the latter a quadruped.
 8      V,  1 |          a man is not naturally a biped, and that he is a quadruped,
 9      V,  1 |          that the horse both is a biped, and is not a quadruped.
10      V,  1 |        with a horse, viz. being a biped: for a man is always and
11      V,  1 |        always and in every case a biped, whereas a horse is never
12      V,  1 |        whereas a horse is never a biped at any time. On the other
13      V,  3 |          of man to be "a walking, biped animal" has rendered a property
14      V,  4 |           of man to be a "walking biped," it would also be a property
15      V,  4 |         of a bird to be a "flying biped": for each of these is the
16      V,  5 |        the man who has said that "biped" is a property of man intends
17      V,  5 | invariably belongs: accordingly, "biped" could not be a property
18      V,  5 |          it either naturally, as "biped" belongs to "man", or actually,
19      V,  6 |        e.g.) inasmuch as "walking biped" is a property of man, it
20      V,  6 |           described "as a walking biped". Not only in the case of
21     VI,  3 |           object; e.g. "a walking biped animal six feet high": for
22     VI,  3 |           this instance:-Man is a biped’: therefore, what is the
23     VI,  3 |           is the same as man is a biped: but "a walking biped animal"
24     VI,  3 |           a biped: but "a walking biped animal" is the same as man,
25     VI,  3 |        man, and therefore walking biped animal is a biped’. But
26     VI,  3 |         walking biped animal is a biped’. But this involves no real
27     VI,  3 |           no real absurdity. For "biped" is not a predicate of "
28     VI,  3 |         we should certainly have "biped" predicated twice of the
29     VI,  3 |          the subject said to be a biped is "a walking biped animal",
30     VI,  3 |          be a biped is "a walking biped animal", so that the word "
31     VI,  3 |        animal", so that the word "biped" is only used as a predicate
32     VI,  6 |          flying", "aquatic", and "biped". Or see if, though the
33     VI,  6 |        genus, e.g. "walking" and "biped" import with them the genus "
34     VI,  6 |        non-subaltern genera, and "biped" is the differentia of both.
35     VI,  6 |         are higher than this, as "biped" carries with it either "