Book, Paragraph

 1     II,  7 |         an expression denoting an excess, and the other an expression
 2     II,  7 |         denoting a defect: for an excess is generally thought to
 3     II,  11|        only in those in which the excess described as an "increased
 4    III,  1 |     proportional sum whenever the excess of the one end over the
 5    III,  1 |         means: e.g. supposing the excess of happiness over health
 6    III,  1 |         smaller amount; ergo, the excess of what produces happiness
 7    III,  3 |    preferable. Moreover, when the excess of a thing is more desirable
 8    III,  3 |           more desirable than the excess of something else, that
 9    III,  3 |     friendship than money: for an excess of friendship is more desirable
10    III,  3 |         is more desirable than an excess of money. So also that of
11    III,  4 |         have only to subtract the excess of one thing over another.
12     IV,  3 |         raised that "defect" and "excess" are found in the same genus (
13     IV,  4 |      multiple of a half, then "in excess of ‘will also be used in
14     IV,  4 |        something, we speak of "in excess" or "greater" in something,
15     IV,  4 |         something: for what is in excess or greater is always in
16     IV,  4 |           or greater is always in excess in something, as well as
17     IV,  4 |          something, as well as in excess of something. Hence the
18     IV,  5 |            e.g.) astonishment as "excess of wonderment" and conviction
19     IV,  5 |         conception". For neither "excess" nor "vehemence" is the
20     IV,  5 | conception" are the genus, while "excess" and "vehemence" are the
21     IV,  5 |     Moreover, if any one renders "excess" and "vehemence" as genera,
22     IV,  5 |  astonished. For "vehemence" and "excess" of a thing are found in
23     IV,  5 |           is thus vehement and in excess. If, therefore, astonishment
24     IV,  5 |        therefore, astonishment be excess of wonderment the astonishment
25     IV,  5 |    calling vehemence vehement and excess excessive: for there is
26     IV,  5 |           then astonishment be an excess, there would be an "excessive
27     IV,  5 |      there would be an "excessive excess". Whereas neither of these
28      V,  6 |       relative to "half", and "in excess" to "exceeded", while "in
29      V,  6 |          to "exceeded", while "in excess" is not a property of "double",
30     VI,  13|         have corresponded to this excess, and to be either good without