Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  5 |         not the same we shall have demolished the definition. Observe,
 2      I,  6 |            accident, we shall have demolished the definition; so that,
 3     II,  2 |         not the same we shall have demolished the problem. Likewise, also,
 4     II,  3 |          not belong, we shall have demolished the universal assertion
 5     II,  4 |           is unreal, we shall have demolished the thing in question.~Moreover,
 6     II,  5 |            when once this has been demolished, the view originally laid
 7     II,  5 |            originally laid down is demolished as well. It is an apparent
 8     II,  5 |          the original statement is demolished as well. But you should
 9    III,  6 |   proposition in question is to be demolished. And likewise, also, if
10    III,  6 | proposition in question is not yet demolished. It is clear, then, that
11    III,  6 |            question will have been demolished. If, however, he has stated
12    III,  6 |             is good, we shall have demolished the statement in question.
13    III,  6 |            question will have been demolished.~It is useful also to take
14      V,  1 |          the intended attribute is demolished.]~An "essential" property
15     VI,  14|       rendered: for if the part be demolished, so too is the whole definition.
16     VI,  14|           laid down will have been demolished, on the principle that there
17    VII,  5 |          whatsoever, we shall have demolished the definition); whereas
18    VII,  5 |          the definition is thereby demolished.~The case stands likewise
19    VII,  5 |        original statement has been demolished. Moreover, in establishing
20    VII,  5 |          the definition is thereby demolished. On the other hand, against
21    VII,  5 |       without as yet being thereby demolished. Likewise also the property
22   VIII,  10|    solution, even though the point demolished be false. For the argument
23   VIII,  10|          not this that needs to be demolished, but rather that "He who
24   VIII,  10|           write. He, then, who has demolished the point on which the fallacy
25   VIII,  10|          object, even if the point demolished be a falsehood, but the
26   VIII,  11|          put forward, it has to be demolished by means of false propositions:
27   VIII,  14|            one of the premisses is demolished, seeing that, given all