Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  2 |       enable us more easily to argue about the subject proposed.
 2      I,  5 |    them. For if we are able to argue that two things are the
 3     II,  1 |    denying it, while those who argue with them overthrow it.
 4     II,  3 |   belongs universally; e.g. to argue that if the soul of man
 5     II,  3 |     e.g.) the geometrician can argue that the triangle has its
 6     II,  9 |       contrary predicate: e.g. argue that good is not necessarily
 7     II,  10|        think of" it.~Moreover, argue from greater and less degrees.
 8     II,  10|     subject.~Moreover, you can argue from the fact that an attribute
 9     II,  11|                     11~You can argue, then, from greater or less
10     II,  11|     ways. Moreover, you should argue from the addition of one
11    III,  3 |       to being good.~Moreover, argue by showing that the thing
12    III,  6 |   supposing we are required to argue that some particular pleasure
13     VI,  1 |      untrue?": for whenever we argue that an accident belongs,
14     VI,  1 |        true, while whenever we argue that it does not belong,
15     VI,  2 |       It is possible, also, to argue sophistically against the
16    VII,  5 | definition it is sufficient to argue against one point only (
17   VIII,  1 |     grants this, one will then argue that the knowledge of contraries
18   VIII,  2 |       homonym of it: thus they argue that a man can very well
19   VIII,  3 | obscurity, it is impossible to argue upon such terms; and because
20   VIII,  3 |         it is a harder task to argue to the point claimed, i.e.
21   VIII,  3 |       and claim that you shall argue to it as well, he will be
22   VIII,  5 |        laid down for those who argue for the sake of training
23   VIII,  14|    cannot find any one else to argue with, we should argue with
24   VIII,  14|       to argue with, we should argue with ourselves. Select,
25   VIII,  14|    statements proposed.~Do not argue with every one, nor practise