Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  4 |       then, we must see of what parts our inquiry consists. Now
 2      I,  4 |         into both the aforesaid parts, and call that part which
 3      V,  5 |       things consisting of like parts, you should look and see,
 4      V,  5 |     things that consist of like parts a man may have his eye on
 5      V,  5 | something that consists of like parts, but has rendered an attribute
 6      V,  5 | something that consists of like parts, but he has stated an attribute
 7      V,  5 |         the things with similar parts, it is on the other hand
 8     VI,  1 |     Definitions falls into five parts. For you have to show either (
 9     VI,  6 |        a "violent disruption of parts that are naturally conjoined".
10     VI,  6 |         reasonings, nor pain of parts naturally conjoined: for
11     VI,  6 |   effect. For the disruption of parts naturally conjoined is not
12     VI,  13|      the same as the sum of its parts are useful in meeting the
13     VI,  13|        seems to assert that the parts are the same as the whole.
14     VI,  13|      the process of putting the parts together is obvious, as
15     VI,  13|       clearly, you may have the parts and yet not have the whole,
16     VI,  13|         have the whole, so that parts and whole cannot be the
17     VI,  13|         same things wherein its parts are, so that the whole will
18     VI,  13|         on the other hand, both parts and whole are found primarily
19     VI,  13|      and another in that of the parts. Again, see whether the
20     VI,  13|          Again, see whether the parts perish together with the
21     VI,  13|         whole perishes when the parts perish; when the whole perishes,
22     VI,  13|        is no necessity that the parts should perish too. Or again,
23     VI,  13|        be good or evil, and the parts neither, or, vice versa,
24     VI,  13|          or, vice versa, if the parts be good or evil and the