Book, Paragraph

 1     II,  9 |          modes of generation and destruction of a thing, and at the things
 2     II,  9 |      evil. In regard to modes of destruction the converse is true: for
 3     II,  9 |        true: for if the modes of destruction rank as good things, then
 4     II,  9 |          whereas if the modes of destruction count as evil, they themselves
 5     II,  11|     destructible thing to escape destruction at a given time, whereas
 6    III,  2 |         things: for things whose destruction is more objectionable are
 7    III,  6 |      processes of generation and destruction. For if anything that destroys
 8    III,  6 |           Likewise, also, if the destruction of knowledge be in some
 9     IV,  4 |      processes of generation and destruction; if (e.g.) to build be to
10     IV,  4 |       decomposition is a kind of destruction. Consider also in the same
11     IV,  4 |       the case of generation and destruction. For if what tends to destroy
12      V,  7 |        for then neither will the destruction of the one be a property
13      V,  7 |         an animal; nor could the destruction of an animal be a property
14      V,  7 |      animal be a property of the destruction of a man. In the same way
15      V,  7 |         become a mortal, and the destruction of a mortal would be a property
16      V,  7 |       would be a property of the destruction of a man. In the same way
17      V,  7 |          also for the purpose of destruction.~Next take a look at the "
18     VI,  6 |     thing immune at present from destruction". For a living thing that
19     VI,  6 |         immune "at present" from destruction will be immortal "at present".
20     VI,  6 |           immune at present from destruction": for it may mean either
21     VI,  6 |        is at present immune from destruction, we mean that it is at present
22    VII,  1 |  question of their formation and destruction, and in general of any thing
23    VII,  3 |         well. Likewise, also, if destruction is the decomposition of
24    VII,  3 | something's essence", then also "destruction" means "the decomposition