Book, Paragraph

 1     II,  4 |    look among the definitions, real or apparent, of the thing
 2     II,  4 |       the thing in question be real: if you wish to establish
 3     II,  4 |      the former be shown to be real, then the thing in question
 4     II,  4 |     also have been shown to be real); while if you want to overthrow
 5     II,  4 |         ask what it is that is real if the thing in question
 6     II,  4 |       the thing in question be real, for if we show that what
 7     II,  5 |    This process is sometimes a real necessity, sometimes an
 8     II,  5 |      neither an apparent nor a real necessity. It is really
 9     VI,  3 | belongs universally, either to real objects in general, or to
10     VI,  3 |        Which of the two is the real state of the case it is
11     VI,  3 |   biped’. But this involves no real absurdity. For "biped" is
12     VI,  4 |        acceptance: for of each real object the essence is single:
13     VI,  6 |        by those who assert the real existence of the "Ideas";
14     VI,  7 |       or to the ears": or "the real" is "what is capable of
15     VI,  7 |      and likewise will be both real and not real. For "pleasant
16     VI,  7 |      will be both real and not real. For "pleasant to the ears"
17     VI,  7 |    that the same thing is both real and unreal.~Moreover, of
18     VI,  12|    science of anything that is real, the definition is clearly
19     VI,  12|        it be a science of some real thing, but not of another,
20     VI,  12|       thing should not be both real and white and good, so that
21     VI,  12|     have for their object some real thing, so that each will
22   VIII,  8 |      negative instance, either real or apparent, shows ill-temper.
23   VIII,  14|   ability is required: in fact real natural ability just is