Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  5 |           kind. We should treat as predicates in the category of essence
 2      I,  9 | distinguish between the classes of predicates in which the four orders
 3      I,  15|         also at the classes of the predicates signified by the term, and
 4      I,  18|       define it: for of the common predicates that which is most definitely
 5     II,  6 |            one and one only of two predicates, as (e.g.) a man must have
 6     II,  7 |           impossible that contrary predicates should belong at the same
 7     II,  7 |            if it be true, contrary predicates must necessarily belong
 8     II,  10|         more likely. Again: If two predicates be attributed to one subject,
 9     II,  10|            other. Moreover: If two predicates be attributed to two subjects,
10     II,  10|            well. Or, supposing two predicates to belong in a like degree
11     II,  10|            is the same also if two predicates belong in a like degree
12     II,  11|           predication: for several predicates of which we cannot speak
13     II,  11|            examine in the same way predicates attributed in a given respect,
14     IV,  6 |           that Being and Unity are predicates of absolutely everything,
15     IV,  6 |            appears to have several predicates in the category of essence,
16     IV,  6 |          are usually thought to be predicates of "anger in the category
17      V,  4 |          of specifically different predicates that belong to it alone,
18      V,  6 |           the point of view of the predicates taken by themselves. This
19      V,  6 |           the point of view of the predicates, positive or negative, and
20     VI,  6 |           for the differentiae are predicates of the species. Moreover,
21    VII,  1 |        being found in one class of predicates, the one signifies a quality
22    VII,  3 |       essence of the thing and the predicates contained therein ought