Book, Paragraph

 1      I,  5 |   example, the question, "Is the honourable or the expedient preferable?"
 2      I,  13|    desirable may mean either the honourable or the pleasant or the expedient";
 3     II,  3 |           the expedient" or "the honourable", you should try either
 4     II,  3 |       e.g. by showing that it is honourable and expedient, or that it
 5     II,  3 | expedient, or that it is neither honourable nor expedient. Supposing,
 6     II,  8 |        made, (e.g.) that "If the honourable is pleasant, what is not
 7     II,  8 |      what is not pleasant is not honourable, while if the latter be
 8     II,  8 |      what is not pleasant be not honourable, then what is honourable
 9     II,  8 |         honourable, then what is honourable is pleasant". Clearly, then,
10     II,  11|          it is in certain places honourable to sacrifice one’s father,
11     II,  11|   whereas, absolutely, it is not honourable. Or possibly this may indicate
12     II,  11|       everywhere it will be held honourable among the Triballi themselves,
13     II,  11|       you are prepared to say is honourable or the contrary. Thus (e.g.)
14     II,  11|        sacrifice one’s father is honourable: it is honourable only to
15     II,  11|      father is honourable: it is honourable only to certain persons:
16     II,  11|     persons: it is not therefore honourable absolutely. On the other
17     II,  11|      gods you will declare to be honourable without adding anything,
18     II,  11|        anything, because that is honourable absolutely. So that whatever
19     II,  11|        generally accounted to be honourable or dishonourable or anything
20    III,  1 |   belongs to the better and more honourable subject, e.g. to a god rather
21    III,  1 |          better or prior or more honourable: thus (e.g.) health is better
22    III,  3 |        the more pleasant or more honourable or more expedient. Again,